Jump to content

Years after calling Bitcoin ‘rat poison,’ Warren Buffett just invested $1 billion in a crypto-friendly bank


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, BangkokHank said:

Well, it does provide a VERY plausible explanation for what I suspected anyway - that Bitcoin is a scam.  I personally cannot see any intrinsic value in cryptocurrencies (although I can see a lot of value in the technology behind cryptocurrencies - the blockchain).  Sure, some people have made a lot of money off of cryptocurrencies so far.  But that's how it always goes with scams:  The original investors do well, luring in suckers later, and then they collapse.

 

So I will never buy Bitcoin - or any other cryptocurrency.  Worst-case scenario, I will miss out on the investment opportunity of a lifetime.  But I have missed MANY great investing opportunities (Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Google, etc.), and yet I have still managed to do OK for myself.  I can forgive myself for missing opportunities, because there will be another one around the corner - and I'll still have my money to invest in it.  What I would not be able to forgive myself for is investing in what to me is an obvious scam.

Alot are scams. In fact most cryptos will get regulated out of existence in the not too distant future but many coins have real world utility which you will see come in to play in the coming years.

There were scams in shares and bonds also remember.

Although there are a few that could technically work as currencies they won't be used as such. All countries will adopt CBCD's and then one or maybe and handful will be used for ODL purposes and exchanges say a digital dollar over to a digital baht.

Although they are all labeled "currencies" and named "coins" that is only to denote a price per unit or share as such..

Drivers license, passports medical records will all become digital in the form of NFTs. Everything stored on your phone or even implanted if Elon Musk and Bill Gates pattens are anything to go by.

The days of scurrying round for pieces of paper are numbered.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sametboy2019 said:

many coins have real world utility

Can you give some examples? What problems are they solving better than existing solutions? And please be specific, not just the usual vague talking points about smart contracts, removing the middleman, reducing cost, etc.

 

2 hours ago, Sametboy2019 said:

All countries will adopt CBCD's

Because of all the hype, central banks have been forced to actually take this serious, with the U.K. releasing a report calling it a solution in search of a problem, I.e. there are absolutely no reason why they would do this. Banking is already digital, and as long as we have trusted actors (like central banks), there is no need for consensus protocols and blockchains. In fact, public ledgers is the last thing banks and their customers want.

 

2 hours ago, Sametboy2019 said:

Drivers license, passports medical records will all become digital in the form of NFTs

Right, we want all that information on public blockchains… not! Also, several countries and some states have already digitized these things, it doesn’t require blockchain, crypto currencies, or NFTs.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lkn said:

Can you give some examples? What problems are they solving better than existing solutions? And please be specific, not just the usual vague talking points about smart contracts, removing the middleman, reducing cost, etc.

 

Because of all the hype, central banks have been forced to actually take this serious, with the U.K. releasing a report calling it a solution in search of a problem, I.e. there are absolutely no reason why they would do this. Banking is already digital, and as long as we have trusted actors (like central banks), there is no need for consensus protocols and blockchains. In fact, public ledgers is the last thing banks and their customers want.

 

Right, we want all that information on public blockchains… not! Also, several countries and some states have already digitized these things, it doesn’t require blockchain, crypto currencies, or NFTs.

I can't be arsed to write loads of paragraphs. The vague you talk about is part of the reasons and I'm not here to convince you but I'll throw you a few bones.

As always DYOR. Banking the unbanked and zero carbon transactions are a big narrative now.

The swift system is outdated and iso2022 system will start to be implemented this year.

You say the banks don't want this and don't want that but they are all investing in crypto.

Also what we want is rarely what we get. As we are seeing now is that under any act of national security or circumstances like a pandemic the government can do whatever they want.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Sametboy2019 said:

I can't be arsed to write loads of paragraphs

I just need one example of a problem it solves.

 

I have heard “banking the unbanked” before, but that is the vague talk I was referring to.

 

The IMF did a case study looking at, amongst others, illegal immigrants doing remittance and found that crypto currency makes it neither cheaper nor easier for immigrants to move their money back to their families. I even have a friend who is pro-Bitcoin and spent a year in Africa where he tried to help some workers transfer money via LocalBitcoins instead of Western Union, because he thought WU was “raping them” (his words), but his efforts were futile, because selling bitcoins in e.g. Zimbabwe, that you received from your husband that works abroad, comes with both risk, fees, and a lot of hassle, when you are one of these unbanked people.

 

48 minutes ago, Sametboy2019 said:

You say the banks don't want this and don't want that but they are all investing in crypto

There are specific things the banks don’t want. For example, they don’t want their customer’s transactions on a public blockchain, they don’t want to lose the ability to reverse errornous/fraudulent transactions, they don’t want a system where chain splits can cause temporary double spend, etc.

 

But they would love to charge you a fee for facilitating a crypto asset sale or charge you custody fees for holding your assets for you, and that is what we are seeing, pretty much all the stuff OP is posting about banks investing in crypto, is really banks investing in companies that sells shovels to gold diggers.

 

Also, about the unbanked, this thread is about BH investing in Nubank, which is banking the unbanked in Latin America, and they do not need any crypto currency or blockchain for this, just a mobile app and an ATM network.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lkn said:

There are specific things the banks don’t want. For example, they don’t want their customer’s transactions on a public blockchain, they don’t want to lose the ability to reverse errornous/fraudulent transactions, they don’t want a system where chain splits can cause temporary double spend, etc.

Another bank that is responsible for spreading FUD about crypto has just bought a lounge in the Metaverse :cheesy: You can't really make this stuff up, Buffet, Munger, Jamie Dimon, who threatened any staff who bought crypto, just to lower the price so they could get an entry point! 

 

Btw, for someone  who dislikes the topics, you spend a lot of time on them ???? 

 

https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/02/15/jpmorgan-is-the-first-bank-into-the-metaverse-looks-at-business-opportunities/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...