Jump to content

A look at petitioners' appeal vs SC historic ruling on Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020


Recommended Posts

Posted

ibppetitionersatamarch2_2022-03-02_12-14-15.jpg

This photo release from the Integrated Bar of the Philippines shows legal counsels of some of the petitioners against the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 who filed a Joint Motion for Partial Reconsideration on March 2, 2022.

Integrated Bar of the Philippines Facebook release

 

MANILA, Philippines (Updated 4:42 p.m.) — Petitioners against the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 on Wednesday filed an appeal to partly reverse the Supreme Court’s historic ruling that mostly kept the law intact in the face of 37 legal challenges.

 

Twenty-six groups of petitioners, through their lawyers, filed a joint motion for partial reconsideration and asked the SC to “partially reconsider” its December 7 ruling and declare the Republic Act 11479 or ATA as unconstitutional.

 

Petitioners represented by the Free Legal Assistance Group filed a supplemental motion for reconsideration that also sought for the issuance of a temporary restraining order.

 

Full Story: https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2022/03/02/2164406/look-petitioners-appeal-vs-sc-historic-ruling-anti-terrorism-act-2020

 

philstar.png
-- © Copyright Philstar 2022-03-02

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...