2 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

 

Clearly you're not aware that this reflects Barr's misrepresentation of the report for which  he was castigated by the judge in the case for misrepresenting the facts.

 

Federal judge slams AG Barr over Mueller report, vows to review unredacted version

A federal judge has vowed to review an unredacted version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation in order to determine if those redactions, ordered by Attorney General William Barr, were warranted and followed federal guidelines.

 

U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton, who is presiding over a lawsuit brought forth by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) -- a nonprofit in Washington, D.C., focused on privacy and First Amendment issues -- in conjunction with BuzzFeed News, said that an independent review of the full, unredacted report is necessary because he has "grave concerns about the objectivity" of Barr's Justice Department in authorizing redactions in line with department rules and exemptions allowed under the Freedom of Information Act

 

Walton -- who was appointed to the bench by former President George W. Bush and was a former FISA court judge -- said in his ruling Thursday that Barr's "lack of candor" is evidenced by his decision to release a summary of the Mueller report effectively exonerating Trump from potential charges of obstruction without the report being made available to the public so they could draw their own conclusions.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-slams-ag-barr-over-mueller-report-vows-to-review-unredacted-version

 

Federal Judge Slams Barr Over Mueller Report

https://www.npr.org/2020/03/06/812989321/federal-judge-slams-barr-over-mueller-report

 

Judge slams Barr, orders review of Mueller report deletions

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/05/judge-slams-bill-barr-122449

 

 

2 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

https://nypost.com/cover/3-25-covers/

Your evidence is dated 20 March 2019, and is from one of conspiracy-supporter Murdoch's minions, the NYP.

 

Nevertheless, I would suggest that this headline has now been overtaken by recent events.

 

I must apologize! I forgot that dates and time are not relevant in an alternate reality!

2 hours ago, LosLobo said:

Your evidence is dated 20 March 2019, and is from one of conspiracy-supporter Murdoch's minions, the NYP.

 

Nevertheless, I would suggest that this headline has now been overtaken by recent events.

 

I must apologize! I forgot that dates and time are not relevant in an alternate reality!

Invoking recent events isn't necessary. Back then the judge castigated Barr for his dishonesty.

11 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Invoking recent events isn't necessary. Back then the judge castigated Barr for his dishonesty.

Back then last month is recent to most I would suggest!

 

Sorry I was referring to the case when the Barr redacted report was released last month that proved conclusively that Barr lied.

 

I didn't realise that another judge had previously been involved.

 

Court Rules William Barr Wrongly Withheld Russia Probe Memo - YouTube

 

Edited October 15, 20223 yr by LosLobo
Update

6 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Back then last month is recent to most I would suggest!

I don't understand. The judge's comments are about 3 years old.

7 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I don't understand. The judge's comments are about 3 years old.

That was in 2020 after the March 2019 date on the NYP.

 

So, being pedantic, if I had said "more recent events" it would have covered both our instances! 

 

Judge slams Barr, orders review of Mueller report deletions - POLITICO

9 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Just so much nonsense here hard to know where to start. You might consider putting in some links to back up your fanciful and false claims?

 

You state "As for the investigation being based on Trump hating human sources, that is again a falsehood."

 

I lazily refute this with ”[Trump is] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Page, who also worked on Mueller’s staff, responded.

“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok texted back.

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/14/fbi-agents-text-reportedly-disclosed-by-justice-watchdog-well-stop-trump-from-becoming-president.html

 

It's our old friend again, irrational hatred for Trump.

"It's our old friend again, irrational hatred for Trump."

 

I resent that.  Trump has been attempting to undermine democracy in the US, undermined our country's alliances with other democracies, and maintains his family's history of avoiding service to country.   As a retired officer who takes his oath to uphold the US Constitution seriously, I consider my hatred of Trump to be rational.

On 10/15/2022 at 1:46 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:

https://nypost.com/cover/3-25-covers/

 

One tells the lies, the other swears to it.

As I've been saying, the russiarussiarussia/Mueller Report is the sleeping Godzilla in the bottom of the ocean that will awaken and destroy [Trump].  Espionage, treason, foreign collusion, and all the trimmings that come along with it.  Hillary channeled Cassandra when she said "Putin's puppet." 

 

You can be sure there is a load of crimes that haven't been publicly revealed yet; it started in June 2015 and he's still at it.  By conservative (ha-ha!) guess-timate I'd say one scofflaw act per month in that period, but probably more like several per week.  Even if he doesn't get the jumpsuit that matches his face paint he'll have to deal with at least ten years of legal entanglements for his transgressions.  Say goodbye to the inheritance, kids.  If he dies before they get to put him in prison is that considered a win?  Ask Bill Cosby how that works.

 

 

Edited October 17, 20223 yr by onthedarkside
derogatory name calling reference removed

The Durham enquiry turned up no evidence to support Trump lies that the FBI or other agencies conspired to de-rail Trump's presidency.

 

Obviously, because the Trump Campaign did conspire with the Russians, QED!

 

Jury acquits an analyst of lying to the FBI over the 'Steele dossier'

 

"Despite hopes by Trump supporters that the prosecutor would uncover a sweeping conspiracy within the FBI and other agencies to derail his candidacy, and then his presidency, the investigation over the course of more than three years failed to produce evidence that met those expectations.

 

The sole conviction — an FBI agent admitted altering an email related to the surveillance of a former Trump aide — was for conduct uncovered not by Durham but by the Justice Department's inspector general, and the two cases that Durham took to trials ended in across-the-board acquittals".

 

Jury acquits an analyst of lying to the FBI over the 'Steele dossier' : NPR

I suggest that the only Russia Russia Hoax was Trump's years of denial of the fact that the Trump Campaign did conspire with Russia to win the 2016 US Presidential Election. 

 

Trump's Durham Probe Backfires, Also Damages National Security!

 

 

Edited October 20, 20223 yr by LosLobo