@Liverpool Lou I agree, I'm not trolling through the posts either, but this is what I have found. Here's how the main sources compare. Claim Thairath (Thai) Thairath English Khaosod English She received a phone call ✔ Yes ✔ Yes ✔ Yes She said she wanted to leave ✔ Yes ✔ Yes ✔ Yes She said she was menstruating ✔ Yes Not mentioned Not mentioned She asked for 500 baht "compensation"/time ✔ Yes ✔ Yes ✔ Yes She later demanded more money ✔ Yes Implied ✔ Yes Argument followed ✔ Yes ✔ Yes ✔ Yes Suspect claims she produced a knife ✔ Yes ✔ Yes ✔ Yes Suspect claims he acted in self-defence ✔ Yes ✔ Yes ✔ Yes Where the differences come fromThe most detailed version appears in the Thai-language report by Thairath. It states that after arriving at the condominium: the girl received a telephone call; she told the suspect she could not stay because she was menstruating; she asked to leave; she requested 500 baht as compensation for her time; while he was reaching for the money, she allegedly asked for more than 500 baht; the argument then escalated. The English-language Thairath article is shorter. It mentions the phone call, wanting to leave, requesting 500 baht, and later demanding more money, but omits the reference to menstruation. The Khaosod English report is even more condensed. It says: she received a phone call; she wanted to leave; she requested 500 baht; she then demanded more money; an argument followed. It also omits any mention of menstruation. Does this mean the reports contradict each other?Not necessarily. At present, the available reports suggest that the menstruation statement and the request for more money are not mutually exclusive. The fuller version is: She received a phone call. She said she wanted to leave. She said she was menstruating. She asked for 500 baht for her time. She then allegedly requested a higher amount. An argument followed. The shorter English reports appear to have condensed the suspect's statement, leaving out the menstruation detail rather than contradicting it. One important pointEvery one of these details comes from the suspect's account during police questioning, not from an independent witness or police finding. Investigators have confirmed CCTV evidence placing the suspect with the victim and transporting the suitcase, but the sequence inside the condominium, including the phone call, menstruation, request for money, alleged knife, and self-defence claim, has not been independently verified in the public reporting so far.
Create an account or sign in to comment