@GroveHillWanderer Once again, you did fall for the LIES hook, line and sinker. This is what Alex Berenson - former NY Times investigative journalist - has to say about that article you - and the Washington Post - are touting. No 'scientific' cherry-picked mumbo-jumbo, but the facts and conclusions in writing that anybody with half a brain can understand. = = = Source: https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-legacy-media-cant-quit-you-mrna And here a couple of excerpts from that short article: # I am so tired of having to fact-check legacy media lies about the mRNA shots. But they won’t stop, so I can’t. On Monday, scientists released a paper [the one you are touting] claiming Covid booster jabs might reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes by 7 percent. The findings come from observational real-world data, not a randomized clinical trial. In such studies, small risk differences must be viewed with extreme skepticism. # Covid is just not very dangerous anymore. So even if Covid jabs do reduce Covid-associated heart attacks and strokes — which this study does not prove — they will do little to improve to overall health. The paper says so explicitly, saying “the absolute risk differences were modest” and estimating that 5,000 booster shots would need to be given to prevent one Covid-associated cardiac event. Of course, you will be unsurprised to hear the study says nothing — not one word — about potential side effects, either short- or long-term, of the shots. # So here we are. Five years after the first catastrophic failure of the mRNA jabs, legacy media outlets are still using falsehoods to push the shots on a population that neither wants nor needs them. The only thing they’re reducing is their own credibility.
