Jump to content

Hunter Biden gushed over 'extravagant' gifts from Burisma exec who was focus of corruption probe


Social Media

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Are you saying that Kushner's expertise and experience as an Equity Fund Manager was as extensive as Hunters Biden's credentials for his position at Burisma?

 

The validity of Kushner's reason is only your opinion and as it has  never been investigated it remains unknown.

 

Actually, the subject of this thread is only Hunter Biden and not the Biden family and "their fans".

...and yet another variation of the "but Trump...." defence used for anything Biden related.  Hunter was a drug addled nobody who was given a sinecure by a company seeking influence with the US government.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
On 6/7/2023 at 7:27 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:

AHA!!!!! So the liberal set in stone narrative that HB was not working for Burisma at the time Shokin was fired is proven total BS. I am loving this slow reveal, it is being played to perfection.

 This is a total game changer. 

It's well known that Hunter Biden was on the Burisma board at the time that Shokin was fired for not investigating Burisma. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/8/2023 at 6:27 AM, SunnyinBangrak said:

AHA!!!!! So the liberal set in stone narrative that HB was not working for Burisma at the time Shokin was fired is proven total BS. I am loving this slow reveal, it is being played to perfection.

 This is a total game changer. 

Whaddya think of the latest game changer?

Edited by placeholder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2023 at 11:05 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Jarod Kushner (who is not the subect of this thread) had a valid reason for receiving money from SA it was invested in a fund he set up). The bidens and their fans still have NO excuse for their receiving all that foreign money. Money which the left falsely claimed for years that they didn't receive at all.

 The comparison is nonsensical.

Did Saudi Arabia have a valid reason to invest $2 billion in a start-up with no track record or investors of demonstrated competence?  A reason other than Kushner's connections and any favors or agreements he may have made while "working" for the US government?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...