webfact Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 A gang involved in a property dispute has agreed to pay 1 million baht in damages to an elderly homeowner, with the payment to be made in three instalments. The Min Buri Civil Court will deliver the final judgment in the trespassing case on May 7. At the Min Buri Civil Court today, lawyer Amnuayporn Maneevan, representing the homeowner in the property dispute, arrived with Sunsan, the grandson of the homeowner, and his wife to negotiate damage compensation in the civil case. Amnuayporn stated that there were two matters at hand: a protection order in the criminal case and mediation in the civil case. Previously, the four defendants had denied the allegations, but today they changed their testimony to a confession. They agreed to compensate the homeowner with 1 million baht, paying 100,000 baht today, another 400,000 baht by the end of the month, and the final 500,000 baht on May 7, the day of the final judgment. The lawyer also mentioned that the court is investigating the defendants’ backgrounds and assessing whether full compensation has been made to the homeowner. The court will deliver a criminal judgment on May 7 which will be influenced by the extent of compensation provided to the victim’s and the defendants’ past behaviour. During today’s discussions, even though the parties initially could not agree on the damage compensation, the opposing party eventually apologised to the homeowner and settled on the 1 million baht compensation, under the condition that they would not interfere with the property or file any more adverse possession claims. In a related development, the rightful owner of the house, known as Agu, has begun reclaiming his property by cutting locks and replacing a sign selling chickens with another sign, reported Sanook. Lawyer Decha, along with Agu’s grandson, revealed messages from the opposing party sent to Agu before the end of his life. In related news, in a high-stakes legal battle, the much-anticipated verdict in the 30 million baht lottery case was delivered on February 7 at the Kanchanaburi Provincial Court. by Samantha Rose Photo courtesy of Sanook Source: The Thaiger 2024-03-26 - Discover how Cigna Insurance can protect you with a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment. For more information on expat health insurance click here. Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Middle Aged Grouch Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 Don't think the home owner was a foreigner. Best thing is to name and shame the crooked developper all over foreign social media from abroad of course and in the newspapers in the hometowns of the dishonest developpers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digbeth Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 1 hour ago, Middle Aged Grouch said: Don't think the home owner was a foreigner. Best thing is to name and shame the crooked developper all over foreign social media from abroad of course and in the newspapers in the hometowns of the dishonest developpers. There is no developer in this case, the neighbor tried to claim empty house next door through adverse possession, got found out and with typical Thai media circus backdown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcmj Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 If they were smart they would have just kept their mouths shut and kept a low profile. They do have squatters rights here so you need to keep an eye on your property and if you see anything suspicious then let it be known. I believe it’s occupying for 10 years, so it’s a long time, but be aware it can happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john donson Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 On 3/26/2024 at 12:28 PM, digbeth said: There is no developer in this case, the neighbor tried to claim empty house next door through adverse possession, got found out and with typical Thai media circus backdown and why is there such a law in the first place ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digbeth Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 On 3/26/2024 at 4:39 PM, jcmj said: If they were smart they would have just kept their mouths shut and kept a low profile. They do have squatters rights here so you need to keep an eye on your property and if you see anything suspicious then let it be known. I believe it’s occupying for 10 years, so it’s a long time, but be aware it can happen. they lost the right of "peaceful, continued, unchallenged" the moment they hightailed out of the house the first time the real owner showed up doubling down and going back in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now