The Conservative Party is set to demand urgent answers regarding Labour’s decision to hand over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, following an announcement by Sir Keir Starmer. The islands, British-owned since 1814 and home to a crucial US-UK military base on Diego Garcia, have become a focal point of political contention. Andrew Mitchell, the shadow foreign secretary, has indicated that the Tories will push for a Commons showdown on Monday to scrutinize the agreement.

 

Mitchell confirmed that the party will table an urgent question if a government minister does not issue a statement explaining the rationale behind the decision. Speaking on *Sky’s Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips*, Mitchell expressed concerns about the deal, saying: "Starting the negotiations is not the same as concluding them." He further implied that while discussions had been initiated under James Cleverly, the former foreign secretary in 2022, this outcome would not have been endorsed by previous Conservative leadership.

 

"From what I’ve seen, this is definitely not a deal either David Cameron or indeed James Cleverly would have done, and we need to see the terms that they’re offering," Mitchell remarked, underscoring the need for a detailed explanation of the agreement. He raised particular concerns about the strategic and financial implications, particularly regarding potential Chinese influence in the region. “We need to know about what protection there is against Chinese encroachment into the archipelago, we need to know what money is being provided by the British taxpayer. We need to probe the terms of the lease,” Mitchell said.

 

As a highly strategic location, Diego Garcia plays a pivotal role in both US and UK military operations. The Tories are alarmed that any shift in sovereignty could alter the dynamics of the existing military agreements, potentially exposing the region to external influence. "From what we’ve seen so far, this looks like a bad deal for Britain," Mitchell warned, emphasizing that the House of Commons is the appropriate platform to dissect the decision.

 

Mitchell's remarks suggest that the Conservatives are preparing to mount a significant challenge to Labour's handling of the Chagos Islands negotiations, framing the issue as a matter of national security and financial transparency. The opposition party is expected to push for clarity on whether British interests, both militarily and economically, have been adequately safeguarded in this arrangement.

 

With this impending Commons debate, the political pressure on Labour is mounting, as the Conservatives prepare to scrutinize the finer details of a decision they believe may weaken Britain's strategic standing in the region.

 

Based on a report from Daily Telegraph 2024-10-08

 

 

 

4 hours ago, Social Media said:

With this impending Commons debate, the political pressure on Labour is mounting, as the Conservatives prepare to scrutinize the finer details of a decision they believe may weaken Britain's strategic standing in the region.

 

 

Good. If Starmer is so determined to damage Britain he should at least follow Parliamentary procedure, rather than ruling by diktat.

These are same Tories who in 2022 started the negotiations to rerun the islands.

14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

These are same Tories who in 2022 started the negotiations to rerun the islands.

 

Rerun the islands?  Bit early to be drinking isn't it?  If you meant to say "return" then that would be equally nonsensical considering that Mauritius has never actually owned them.   As the article says, starting negotiations is not the same as concluding them, and Labour have form for being pathetically weak negotiators as we saw from the capitulation with the train drivers who were given everything they wanted for absolutely nothing in return.      

 

Now Labour will have to face the embarrassment of owning up to their incompetence and how much more taxpayers money they have squandered for nothing in return.    Utter shambles of a government.   

The military base is probably the biggest moneymaker that Mauritius has so it is unlikely to break their agreement.

HM government has lost every single case brought before the various international courts. They castigate other nations who don't abide by such rulings (China in the "South China" Sea, Putin, Duterte, and a host of others who refuse to recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC, the ICJ, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, and the UN General Assembly). The current administration's bold move to actually abide by them is the right thing to do. Their position was untenable. No doubt there'll be howls of displeasure from the US.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chagos_Archipelago

Edited October 8, 20241 yr by bradiston

1 hour ago, bradiston said:

HM government has lost every single case brought before the various international courts. They castigate other nations who don't abide by such rulings (China in the "South China" Sea, Putin, Duterte, and a host of others who refuse to recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC, the ICJ, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, and the UN General Assembly). The current administration's bold move to actually abide by them is the right thing to do. Their position was untenable. No doubt there'll be howls of displeasure from the US.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chagos_Archipelago

 

The UN rulings are non binding advisories and are not law so there was no need for the UK to do anything.   It was the wrong thing to do.  They didn't even ask the islanders.   Mauritius has never owned the islands and have no claim to them and not just that, they are an ally to a strategic rival in China.   On top of that the UK will now be paying rent on this which will be an embarrassing amount of money which is why Labour are not telling how much as though they can keep it secret indefinately - that is how stupid they are.   

 

This Labour government has made many stupid, ill conceived, embarrassing choices since they gained power that make the UK poorer, weaker and less secure.  This is just one of so, so many.  They are out of their depth and out of control.   Absolute clown show.  

1 hour ago, James105 said:

 

The UN rulings are non binding advisories and are not law so there was no need for the UK to do anything.   It was the wrong thing to do.  They didn't even ask the islanders.   Mauritius has never owned the islands and have no claim to them and not just that, they are an ally to a strategic rival in China.   On top of that the UK will now be paying rent on this which will be an embarrassing amount of money which is why Labour are not telling how much as though they can keep it secret indefinately - that is how stupid they are.   

 

This Labour government has made many stupid, ill conceived, embarrassing choices since they gained power that make the UK poorer, weaker and less secure.  This is just one of so, so many.  They are out of their depth and out of control.   Absolute clown show.  

Ok. List please the "many stupid, ill conceived, embarrassing (sic) choices" Labour has made, seeing as there are "so, so many".

 

The ICJ rulings were damning in every respect, all 7 of them, against the UK. The International Tribunal of the Sea ditto. We have no claim there. You don't like China's behaviour yet you would follow the same route. You've no leg to stand on. It's just Rule Britannia. Falklands Mk II.

Edited October 8, 20241 yr by bradiston