It was just soooooo enjoyable watching Harris read out the confirmation of Trump as POTUS.

[OneMoreFarang]

4 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

Somewhat more than a few, actually 75,011,877 which represented 48.3% of the total vote. trump received 49.8% of the total vote.

Don't bring up facts! That only irritates those MAGA boys. They are used to a lot of lies and lots of shouting. Facts? Who of them even knows what that is? 

[Yagoda]

30 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

She supports the US constitution and the peaceful transfer of power. That is what every American citizen and especially every American politician should do. But MAGA boys are obviously different. What a bunch of sad suckers.

 

Still harping on that lie? The American people dont care, they recognize propaganda.

 

How many cops died on Jan 6 btw? Did Trump grab the steering wheel?

[transam]

2 hours ago, flexomike said:

I think you should just start thinking, seems to be a major issue for you.

Says the bloke with no idea at all...........😂

So what do you think of your crook leaders plans............?

 

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-pledges-rename-gulf-182108985.html

 

Oh, you didn't know, don't worry, you will be OK............🤣

 

 

 

[jas007]

I didn't bother to watch the whole thing, but I did see a short snippet of Harris announcing the vote for certification.  She sort of seemed happy.  As if the charade was finally over and she could go back to being a nobody. 

[transam]

3 minutes ago, jas007 said:

I didn't bother to watch the whole thing, but I did see a short snippet of Harris announcing the vote for certification.  She sort of seemed happy.  As if the charade was finally over and she could go back to being a nobody. 

Sort of, similar to you then........?  😉

[jas007]

16 minutes ago, transam said:

Sort of, similar to you then........?  😉

At this point, I'm a nobody, for sure. In the grand scheme of things, I always was. I never was trying to be "somebody."  My objective was independence.  Work as little as possible for as much money as possible.  And the minute I could retire, that's exactly what I did.  

[Keep Right]

Kamala will join Hillary as the only two women to run for President and fail miserably. Not because they are women but because the American citizens reject the left wing socialist, globalist ideology of these women. It seems that the Democrats just do not get it as it was obvious by the huge mandate that Trump got. Let's hope Kamala will just fade away and be put out to pasture with old sleepy Joe.

[Will B Good]

7 minutes ago, Keep Right said:

Kamala will join Hillary as the only two women to run for President and fail miserably. Not because they are women but because the American citizens reject the left wing socialist, globalist ideology of these women. It seems that the Democrats just do not get it as it was obvious by the huge mandate that Trump got. Let's hope Kamala will just fade away and be put out to pasture with old sleepy Joe.

Failed miserably?......You mean came a close second.

 

Had the Dems fielded a white, male, married with kids, Trump would have lost.

 

 

[transam]

16 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Failed miserably?......You mean came a close second.

 

Had the Dems fielded a white, male, married with kids, Trump would have lost.

 

 

Yep, isn't it strange how these Trump voters tell lies just like their lying crook leader........🤔

[transam]

35 minutes ago, jas007 said:

At this point, I'm a nobody, for sure. In the grand scheme of things, I always was. I never was trying to be "somebody."  My objective was independence.  Work as little as possible for as much money as possible.  And the minute I could retire, that's exactly what I did.  

That was a bit off-topic...................😂

[jas007]

13 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Failed miserably?......You mean came a close second.

 

Had the Dems fielded a white, male, married with kids, Trump would have lost.

Really?  In other words you think Kamala lost because she was a woman of color with no kids?  I don't think so.

 

She lost because the so-called "Democrats" ventured into some sort of alternate reality a long time ago and were on the verge of destroying America.  People woke up as the media lost control of the narrative, and the rest is history.  The propaganda machine failed.  

[jas007]

1 minute ago, transam said:

That was a bit off-topic...................😂

Just responding to the post. 

[Will B Good]

9 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Really?  In other words you think Kamala lost because she was a woman of color with no kids?  I don't think so.

 

She lost because the so-called "Democrats" ventured into some sort of alternate reality a long time ago and were on the verge of destroying America.  People woke up as the media lost control of the narrative, and the rest is history.  The propaganda machine failed.  

 

That being the case the vote was staggeringly tight and far from a ringing endorsement of Trump.......don't you think?

 

If your contention is correct I would have expected a resounding victory in the popular vote for Trump.

 

Childless cat lady, mixed race and crazy policies......and still came a close second.

[transam]

3 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Really?  In other words you think Kamala lost because she was a woman of color with no kids?  I don't think so.

 

She lost because the so-called "Democrats" ventured into some sort of alternate reality a long time ago and were on the verge of destroying America.  People woke up as the media lost control of the narrative, and the rest is history.  The propaganda machine failed.  

No, Harris was thrown in at the deep end, you don't understand WBG's post...🥴

[Lapun]

19 hours ago, 0james0 said:

I didn’t see it but if she showed up it would have been fun to watch. I’m sure her handlers took her bottle away from her before she got up there.

Just another simpleton repeating misinformation without bothering to check if it is true or not.

 

Please look at https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/aug/22/social-media/no-social-media-videos-do-not-show-kamala-harris-i/

but then I suppose those who want to believe bulls**t will do so anyway & pass it on to as many as they can to prove how right they are. 

[jas007]

15 minutes ago, transam said:

No, Harris was thrown in at the deep end, you don't understand WBG's post...🥴

You're assuming that those who might have voted differently would be distributed is such a manner as to affect the outcome of states that might have been flipped in favor of Harris as a result.

 

The popular vote doesn't matter. Flipping certain Red States might have mattered, but I'm not  sure you can make that assumption.   

[transam]

1 minute ago, jas007 said:

You're assuming that those who might have voted differently would be distributed is such a manner as to affect the outcome of states that might have been flipped in favor of Harris as a result.

 

The popular vote doesn't matter. Flipping certain Red States might have mattered, but I'm not some sure you can make that assumption.   

There is no assumption, there was very little difference in the actual individual voting, for folk to say otherwise is false....🤔

Harris being sent in at the deep end did a fairly good job, the actual end result was a mystery, you voted in a crook, a dodgy business dealer and a sexual creep into the big chair.  

 

Now YOU have the Trump/African bloke duo, telling the UK what to do with its territory, threats to take over Greenland, the dynamic duo are in fact budding dictators, which you signed up for...😱

 

Release the Capitol rioters from prison, Trumps admission of guilt, go after politicians that spoke against him, yes, a dictator, all what you strange people voted for...........😱

 

If it wasn't so sad, it would be funny...........😌

[proton]

Well Kamala is not laughing now is she, we are! Worst ever Presidential candidate but still millions voted for her just out of party loyalty. How did she spend all that money?

[novacova]

1 minute ago, proton said:

Well Kamala is not laughing now is she, we are! Worst ever Presidential candidate but still millions voted for her just out of party loyalty. How did she spend all that money?

The political left just wanted to see how far they could push it with a bad candidate, some people on the left realized they got duped and suckered in when they bought the Biden joke. Quite remarkable how many fell for the Harris prop.

[cooked]

20 hours ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

I suppose the irony is lost on you. We all know what happens when Trump loses. 2021 ring any bells in that hollow head?

You got it the wrong way round. Suppose you weren't a typical Biden supporter, who only reads news sources that support your world view. In that case, you might see that the "Insurrection" was't an attempted insurrection, both legally and in intention. Trump's last-minute Tweet urging people to stay peaceful was immediately censored, appeals by Trump to call the National Guard were refused, people like Joe Biden were still claiming years later, that FIVE policemen had been killed, security guys politely invited people onto the premises, thereby making them automatically in breach od the law... etc etc. 

Never mind, it took 4 years of Biden to ensure that it was "never again:" time.

[jas007]

9 minutes ago, transam said:

There is no assumption, there was very little difference in the actual individual voting, for folk to say otherwise is false....🤔

Yep, the raw totals were close.  But that's not what matters.  What matters is the electoral college vote.  You surely know how that works.  

 

To elect a Democrat, enough votes would have to be flipped in certain Red states to change the outcomes there.  For all we know, a white, male, Democratic candidate with kids would have changed people's votes mainly in California and New York, but not in one swing state.  

 

The original question seems to assume that some people who voted for Trump didn't vote for Harris only because they were racist, misogynist, and because she didn't have any kids.  I don't think so.  They didn't vote for Harris because the "Democrats" were too extreme. Their agenda was crazy. 

 

Somewhere online, there 's a video floating around made by a so-called political science "expert" woman, who recorded it after going out  to buy a bottle of champagne to celebrate a Harris "victory." She was of the opinion that Harris would win because, in her mind, the only real issue for women was women's "reproductive rights," and that issue alone would put Harris over the top.  After Harris lost, she recorded another video explaining why she was wrong.  Those are fun to watch. 

 

[amexpat]

On 1/7/2025 at 8:15 AM, stevenl said:

I really don't understand this gloating that many are doing on here.

They should enjoy it now. They will face a lifetime of  "I Told you so."

[transam]

1 minute ago, jas007 said:

Yep, the raw totals were close.  But that's not what matters.  What matters is the electoral college vote.  You surely know how that works.  

 

To elect a Democrat, enough votes would have to be flipped in certain Red states to change the outcomes there.  For all we know, a white, male, Democratic candidate with kids would have changed people's votes mainly in California and New York, but not in one swing state.  

 

The original question seems to assume that some people who voted for Trump didn't vote for Harris only because they were racist, misogynist, and because she didn't have any kids.  I don't think so.  They didn't vote for Harris because the "Democrats" were too extreme. Their agenda was crazy. 

 

Somewhere online, there 's a video floating around made by a so-called political science "expert" woman, who recorded it after going out  to buy a bottle of champagne to celebrate a Harris "victory." She was of the opinion that Harris would win because, in her mind, the only real issue for women was women's "reproductive rights," and that issue alone would put Harris over the top.  After Harris lost, she recorded another video explaining why she was wrong.  Those are fun to watch. 

 

BUT, the Dem's would NOT bring down the USA on the World stage, what you voted for, looks like will. You've got a wannabe dictator, now, you voters know it...........😱

[jas007]

6 minutes ago, transam said:

BUT, the Dem's would NOT bring down the USA on the World stage, what you voted for, looks like will. You've got a wannabe dictator, now, you voters know it...........😱

Well, Trump seems to think otherwise. Did you watch his Mar Lago news conference?  As for the so-called World Stage?  That seems to be changing faster than anyone ever imagined at this point.  One after another, Leftist leaders are on the way out, with their Globalist agendas in tatters.  Give it six months and let's see what happens. 

[transam]

21 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Well, Trump seems to think otherwise. Did you watch his Mar Lago news conference?  As for the so-called World Stage?  That seems to be changing faster than anyone ever imagined at this point.  One after another, Leftist leaders are on the way out, with their Globalist agendas in tatters.  Give it six months and let's see what happens. 

No, I didn't watch it, pointless, I have watched months of his stuff, he is a liar and very odd.....

 

The UK just voted in a Lefty government, so I will wait and see if the USA is happy with their new dictator in the making............😉

[0james0]

2 hours ago, Lapun said:

Just another simpleton repeating misinformation without bothering to check if it is true or not.

 

Please look at https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/aug/22/social-media/no-social-media-videos-do-not-show-kamala-harris-i/

but then I suppose those who want to believe bulls**t will do so anyway & pass it on to as many as they can to prove how right they are. 

Political fact site? Delirious. Amazing you refuse to spot a drunk on camera, a politician drunk at that! Kamala is a total lush!