Democracy has failed the US,maybe it's time for a King

[Yagoda]

44 minutes ago, Skeptic7 said:

You set yourself apart here every day. You hold yourself in extremely high regard, along with the rest of your ilk. Like it or don't...humans are animals. YOU are an animal. And there's still zero evidence of you (or any human) having a "soul". 👻 

You can have the last word, I might be lots of things, but not a souless hater.

[uncletiger]

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Let me guess who convinced you of that one.

 

I merely woke up earlier than you, that's all. You will too as everything is exposed. We are all victims of the globalists. When you're ready, nobody will shame you for taking an extra few years.

[Yellowtail]

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

At least people in some countries recognized this big problem and they are working on solutions that kids don't use social media or any smart phones until they are "old enough".

Are there countries that that have not recognized this problem? 

[OneMoreFarang]

11 hours ago, uncletiger said:

I merely woke up earlier than you, that's all. You will too as everything is exposed. We are all victims of the globalists. When you're ready, nobody will shame you for taking an extra few years.

 

I think you watched The Matrix too many times.

My eyes, ears, and brain work fine, and I can assure you that I don't have your problem.

[thaibeachlovers]

22 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Is the Topic not Trump? 

 

Why drag homosexuals priests fiddling with kids into it? 

 

Are you excited about Monday? 

Did you read the title of the topic? Apparently not.

[thaibeachlovers]

15 hours ago, liddelljohn said:

What You Need is a revolution by the working people to take power from the  ELITE, the Media  and The Systems of divide and rule ...

Good grief! There would be civil war in a week as the gangs sought to take over.

I don't like the elites, but at least they are not all criminals with less functioning brain cells than a sea slug.

[uncletiger]

8 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

 

I think you watched The Matrix too many times.

My eyes, ears, and brain work fine, and I can assure you that I don't have your problem.

 

One thing about the truth is it serves as a one way valve. Once you've recognized it, you can't go back. Which is why support for Trump is monotonically increasing. So by all means, take your time. The truth isn't going anywhere. It'll still be here when you're ready to see it.

 

In the mean time, just know the craziness we've all seen over the past years is going to be ramped up to even more ludicrous levels, until the underlying reality becomes obvious to almost everyone.

 

And as for whether or not democracy has failed, Kings aren't necessary and Trump isn't destroying democracy.  He is, however, exposing that we've never actually had it in our lifetimes.

[SiSePuede419]

15 hours ago, uncletiger said:

Once you've recognized it,

That's not "truth". 😆

 

Here are some guidelines to help identify truth:

1. Consistency

Truth is often consistent over time and across different situations. If a claim aligns with established facts or remains stable under scrutiny, it may indicate truth.

2. Evidence-Based

Truth is supported by credible evidence. Look for:

Reliable sources: Peer-reviewed studies, expert opinions, and verified data.

Reproducibility: Claims that can be independently verified or tested.

3. Logical Coherence

Truth aligns with logic and reason. It should follow clear reasoning and avoid contradictions.

4. Context Awareness

Recognizing truth requires understanding the context. Consider cultural, historical, and situational factors that might influence perception or presentation.

5. Lack of Bias

Truth seeks objectivity. Evaluate whether the information is free from personal, financial, or ideological bias.

6. Cross-Verification

Compare information from multiple independent sources. If diverse perspectives agree, it strengthens credibility.

7. Clarity and Simplicity

Truth is often straightforward and doesn't require overly complicated justifications. (Occam's Razor: the simplest explanation is often correct.)

8. Openness to Scrutiny

Truth welcomes questions and challenges. Claims that withstand rigorous examination are more likely to be valid.

9. Authenticity

Truth resonates with reality and aligns with personal experiences or observations, though subjective truth requires careful consideration alongside objective evidence.

10. Humility in Doubt

Recognizing truth often involves acknowledging uncertainties and being open to updates when new evidence arises.
 

 

[Yellowtail]

35 minutes ago, SiSePuede419 said:

That's not "truth". 😆

 

Here are some guidelines to help identify truth:

1. Consistency

Truth is often consistent over time and across different situations. If a claim aligns with established facts or remains stable under scrutiny, it may indicate truth.

2. Evidence-Based

Truth is supported by credible evidence. Look for:

Reliable sources: Peer-reviewed studies, expert opinions, and verified data.

Reproducibility: Claims that can be independently verified or tested.

3. Logical Coherence

Truth aligns with logic and reason. It should follow clear reasoning and avoid contradictions.

4. Context Awareness

Recognizing truth requires understanding the context. Consider cultural, historical, and situational factors that might influence perception or presentation.

5. Lack of Bias

Truth seeks objectivity. Evaluate whether the information is free from personal, financial, or ideological bias.

6. Cross-Verification

Compare information from multiple independent sources. If diverse perspectives agree, it strengthens credibility.

7. Clarity and Simplicity

Truth is often straightforward and doesn't require overly complicated justifications. (Occam's Razor: the simplest explanation is often correct.)

8. Openness to Scrutiny

Truth welcomes questions and challenges. Claims that withstand rigorous examination are more likely to be valid.

9. Authenticity

Truth resonates with reality and aligns with personal experiences or observations, though subjective truth requires careful consideration alongside objective evidence.

10. Humility in Doubt

Recognizing truth often involves acknowledging uncertainties and being open to updates when new evidence arises.
 

 

Here are some guidelines to help identify truth:

1. Consistency

Truth is often consistent over time and across different situations. If a claim aligns with established facts or remains stable under scrutiny, it may indicate truth.

 

The Earth was believed to be flat consistently for thousands of years. 

2. Evidence-Based

Truth is supported by credible evidence. Look for:

Reliable sources: Peer-reviewed studies, expert opinions, and verified data.

Reproducibility: Claims that can be independently verified or tested.

 

The Earth was believed to be flat based on the evidence for thousands of years

 

3. Logical Coherence

Truth aligns with logic and reason. It should follow clear reasoning and avoid contradictions.

 

The Earth being flat aligned with logic and reason for thousands of years

4. Context Awareness

Recognizing truth requires understanding the context. Consider cultural, historical, and situational factors that might influence perception or presentation.

 

The Earth was believed to be flat after considering the cultural, historical, and situational factors that might influence perception or presentation for thousands of years

5. Lack of Bias

Truth seeks objectivity. Evaluate whether the information is free from personal, financial, or ideological bias.

 

The Earth was believed to be flat objectively by everyone for thousands of years.

6. Cross-Verification

Compare information from multiple independent sources. If diverse perspectives agree, it strengthens credibility.

 

The Earth was cross-verified from multiple independent sources as be being flat for thousands of years. 

7. Clarity and Simplicity

Truth is often straightforward and doesn't require overly complicated justifications. (Occam's Razor: the simplest explanation is often correct.)

 

The Earth being flat was the simplest explanation for thousands of years. 

8. Openness to Scrutiny

Truth welcomes questions and challenges. Claims that withstand rigorous examination are more likely to be valid.

 

The Earth being flat withstood rigorous examination for thousands of years.

9. Authenticity

Truth resonates with reality and aligns with personal experiences or observations, though subjective truth requires careful consideration alongside objective evidence.

 

The Earth being flat resonated with reality and aligned with personal experiences and or observations by everyone for thousands of years.

10. Humility in Doubt

Recognizing truth often involves acknowledging uncertainties and being open to updates when new evidence arises.

 

The Earth is not flat, so even though that "truth" met all your standards for truth, it was never the truth, and your standards are ridiculous. 

 

It is critical that the left make truth subjective with this kind of nonsense. There is no your truth or my truth, there is only the truth. 

[stevenl]

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Here are some guidelines to help identify truth:

1. Consistency

Truth is often consistent over time and across different situations. If a claim aligns with established facts or remains stable under scrutiny, it may indicate truth.

 

The Earth was believed to be flat consistently for thousands of years. 

2. Evidence-Based

Truth is supported by credible evidence. Look for:

Reliable sources: Peer-reviewed studies, expert opinions, and verified data.

Reproducibility: Claims that can be independently verified or tested.

 

The Earth was believed to be flat based on the evidence for thousands of years

 

3. Logical Coherence

Truth aligns with logic and reason. It should follow clear reasoning and avoid contradictions.

 

The Earth being flat aligned with logic and reason for thousands of years

4. Context Awareness

Recognizing truth requires understanding the context. Consider cultural, historical, and situational factors that might influence perception or presentation.

 

The Earth was believed to be flat after considering the cultural, historical, and situational factors that might influence perception or presentation for thousands of years

5. Lack of Bias

Truth seeks objectivity. Evaluate whether the information is free from personal, financial, or ideological bias.

 

The Earth was believed to be flat objectively by everyone for thousands of years.

6. Cross-Verification

Compare information from multiple independent sources. If diverse perspectives agree, it strengthens credibility.

 

The Earth was cross-verified from multiple independent sources as be being flat for thousands of years. 

7. Clarity and Simplicity

Truth is often straightforward and doesn't require overly complicated justifications. (Occam's Razor: the simplest explanation is often correct.)

 

The Earth being flat was the simplest explanation for thousands of years. 

8. Openness to Scrutiny

Truth welcomes questions and challenges. Claims that withstand rigorous examination are more likely to be valid.

 

The Earth being flat withstood rigorous examination for thousands of years.

9. Authenticity

Truth resonates with reality and aligns with personal experiences or observations, though subjective truth requires careful consideration alongside objective evidence.

 

The Earth being flat resonated with reality and aligned with personal experiences and or observations by everyone for thousands of years.

10. Humility in Doubt

Recognizing truth often involves acknowledging uncertainties and being open to updates when new evidence arises.

 

The Earth is not flat, so even though that "truth" met all your standards for truth, it was never the truth, and your standards are ridiculous. 

 

It is critical that the left make truth subjective with this kind of nonsense. There is no your truth or my truth, there is only the truth. 

According to you it met all standards, but objectively it did not.

[Yellowtail]

10 minutes ago, stevenl said:

According to you it met all standards, but objectively it did not.

No, it met all the left's standards, not mine. For me, the truth has to be true, to the left it just has to promote the ideology. 

 

You get those papers done?