Thai PM Denies Opposition’s 30-Hour Censure Debate Control

[snoop1130]

Photo courtesy of Bower Group Asia

 

Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has dismissed the opposition's bid to dictate the entirety of a proposed 30-hour censure debate duration. On March 18, she clarified that controlling the length of the debate is beyond her jurisdiction. The coalition government echoed her views, deeming the opposition's request disproportionate.

 

Responsibility for determining the debate's timeframe rests with the government and opposition whips, who are scheduled to meet shortly for a decision. Previously, PM Paetongtarn consented to a balanced 30-hour debate, divided equally between both parties. However, the opposition's insistence on monopolising the full duration has stirred contention.

 

During a recent Cabinet meeting, PM Paetongtarn informed members of a schedule adjustment, delaying their weekly gathering to March 27 to allow for the debate set for early next week, per government spokesperson Jirayu Houngsub.

 

 

 

In a conciliatory move, the opposition agreed to refer to former PM Thaksin Shinawatra, Paetongtarn’s father, as "a family member" in the debate, a stipulation she accepted without reservation. Despite being beyond the official political landscape, Thaksin remains an influential figure within the ruling Pheu Thai Party.

 

She also addressed the opposition's promotional poster for the debate featuring the slogan "a Deal for a Country," noting its provocative nature intended to garner attention. Meanwhile, Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn, deputy leader of the People's Party, argued that the slogan criticises Pheu Thai's perceived failures to honor its promises, impacting the public negatively.

 

As preparations for the censure debate advance, the focus remains on negotiating a fair and effective platform for governmental scrutiny, reported The Thaiger.

 

-- 2025-03-19

 

 

[ikke1959]

It should take time which is needed, no limits at all

[MikeandDow]

Quote:  criticises Pheu Thai's perceived failures to honor its promises, impacting the public negatively.

this unelected goverment has not kept any of its promises so the poster is CORRECT !