Jump to content

Democrats Seize on MAGA Weakness as Trump’s Absence Shakes GOP Strongholds


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 3/28/2025 at 5:11 AM, candide said:

This time they have been caught, but how many times have they used Signal on other confidential subjects? They obviously did not start to use it for this specific purpose.

I'm glad you asked:

Democrats stretching back nearly a decade have touted the use of the encrypted messaging app Signal, long before the Trump administration came under the national spotlight for using the app to discuss a plan of attack on terrorists in Yemen. 

"We have all these Signal chats. If you don’t have Signal, get on Signal, okay? Do not trust …. get on Signal," Texas Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett said just Saturday during a speech before a Human Rights Campaign event in Los Angeles. 

Crockett touted the use of Signal in the context of protected chats among colleagues, such as a "Dem women's caucus chat" she belongs to and how Democrat lawmakers trade scuttlebutt from the Hill. 

 

A few fun stories you may not have seen: https://www.foxnews.com/category/us/democratic-party  :wai:

 

As far as the topic goes, this quote pretty much sums it up: :coffee1:

On 3/27/2025 at 7:03 PM, Social Media said:

A Democratic voter, speaking to the Associated Press, made her motivation clear: She was “tired of the bullyism” and wanted to “stick it” to Republicans.

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
7 hours ago, mrwebb8825 said:

I'm glad you asked:

Democrats stretching back nearly a decade have touted the use of the encrypted messaging app Signal, long before the Trump administration came under the national spotlight for using the app to discuss a plan of attack on terrorists in Yemen. 

"We have all these Signal chats. If you don’t have Signal, get on Signal, okay? Do not trust …. get on Signal," Texas Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett said just Saturday during a speech before a Human Rights Campaign event in Los Angeles. 

Crockett touted the use of Signal in the context of protected chats among colleagues, such as a "Dem women's caucus chat" she belongs to and how Democrat lawmakers trade scuttlebutt from the Hill. 

 

A few fun stories you may not have seen: https://www.foxnews.com/category/us/democratic-party  :wai:

 

As far as the topic goes, this quote pretty much sums it up: :coffee1:

 

The usual MAGA false equivalence tactics! 🤣

 

That's irrelevant! It was not to discuss confidential military operations.....

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 hours ago, candide said:

The usual MAGA false equivalence tactics! 🤣

 

That's irrelevant! It was not to discuss confidential military operations.....

I think I understand your position now. Dem do good. Rep do bad. Mondo like candy. :stoner:

  • Confused 4
Posted
1 hour ago, mrwebb8825 said:

I think I understand your position now. Dem do good. Rep do bad. Mondo like candy. :stoner:

Another way to say that you have nothing.to contradict my comment..🙂

 

You wrote yourself that it was about discussions on human rights.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, candide said:

Another way to say that you have nothing.to contradict my comment..🙂

 

You wrote yourself that it was about discussions on human rights.

Since you have obviously misunderstood every word of what I wrote except "Human Rights". When you get better in English you'll understand. :coffee1:

16 hours ago, mrwebb8825 said:

"We have all these Signal chats. If you don’t have Signal, get on Signal, okay? Do not trust …. get on Signal," Texas Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett said just Saturday during a speech before a Human Rights Campaign event in Los Angeles.

 

Posted
16 hours ago, mrwebb8825 said:

I'm glad you asked:

Democrats stretching back nearly a decade have touted the use of the encrypted messaging app Signal, long before the Trump administration came under the national spotlight for using the app to discuss a plan of attack on terrorists in Yemen. 

"We have all these Signal chats. If you don’t have Signal, get on Signal, okay? Do not trust …. get on Signal," Texas Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett said just Saturday during a speech before a Human Rights Campaign event in Los Angeles. 

Crockett touted the use of Signal in the context of protected chats among colleagues, such as a "Dem women's caucus chat" she belongs to and how Democrat lawmakers trade scuttlebutt from the Hill. 

So what has non-governmental scuttlebutt got to do with military secrets being shared? Just lame "whadaboutism" you say? I agree.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, mrwebb8825 said:

Since you have obviously misunderstood every word of what I wrote except "Human Rights". When you get better in English you'll understand. :coffee1:

 

So he did not claim it should be used for confidential military operations, did he?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

I suppose its lucky Vladimir wasn't added under vp .mind you some of the maga would have him down as bff .

To make the screw up they did was bad but the response was pathetic rather than own up you get a clown show tulsi ect on display  showing exactly what she is 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...