Gemini 2.5 Advanced: It's sucking out the contents of my brain. Big Time!

[Gottfrid]

2 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

So then what do you say to the "AI 2027" research and paper that is now circulating around?

Are you saying that is is not based on reality?

 

I think you need to read this paper, and do the research, before you smugly pass it off as any kind of fairy tale.

Seriously.

 

You are probably living in the past, and in a different world from that which we are now entering.

 

If you believe that This Can't Happen Here, then this is a perfect example of human biases at work.

 

 

I am living in the past? it´s you sitting playing with AI. I work with SEO, web dev and AI combined, every single day. I am updated about all regarding this.

Now we go to your paper. I suggest you should research what the people that are making the information you read are affiliated with. What AI projects? Most of the papers you read are biased, out of one single reason. The people behind it are promoting their own products disguised under something they call research. That´s how you do effective marketing today. It will take many more years before AI take over.

[GammaGlobulin]

1 minute ago, Gottfrid said:

I am living in the past? it´s you sitting playing with AI. I work with SEO, web dev and AI combined, every single day. I am updated about all regarding this.

Now we go to your paper. I suggest you should research what the people that are making the information you read are affiliated with. What AI projects? Most of the papers you read are biased, out of one single reason. The people behind it are promoting their own products disguised under something they call research. That´s how you do effective marketing today. It will take many more years before AI take over.

 

So everyone has an opinion.

 

What is your opinion concerning the year that we will see the arrival of Superhuman Programmers?

This year will represent a watershed for many things.

 

 

[save the frogs]

11 hours ago, Gottfrid said:

It will take many more years before AI take over.

 

Some people are predicting all jobs done by computer will be replaced by AI agents by 2030.

 

Or there may be some strange hybrid system where an IT manager is managing some human workers along with AI agents .... no one can predict exactly what it will look like. 

 

It could be they are exaggerating the timeline ... or maybe not. 

 

As these models are meant to grow exponentially, not incrementally. 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

8 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

 

Some people are predicting all jobs done by computer will be replaced by AI agents by 2030.

 

Or there may be some strange hybrid system where an IT manager is managing some human workers along with AI agents .... no one can predict exactly what it will look like. 

 

It could be they are exaggerating the timeline ... or maybe not. 

 

As these models are meant to grow exponentially, not incrementally. 

 

 

The timeline is sometime in 2026 when we will see Superhuman Coding.

This is a crucial milestone in human history.

When will we see superhuman coding at the 2X level?  Maybe in 2027....

 

[save the frogs]

11 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

The timeline is sometime in 2026 when we will see Superhuman Coding.

This is a crucial milestone in human history.

 

 

Yeah, it could be fairly soon.

 

For physical labor like plumbers etc ... the timeline is much longer because it's complicated to put out billions of physical humanoid robots to replace people. 

 

Yes, the world will change more radically in the next 10 years than it has in the last 100 years.

 

 

[jas007]

1 hour ago, Gottfrid said:

I am living in the past? it´s you sitting playing with AI. I work with SEO, web dev and AI combined, every single day. I am updated about all regarding this.

Now we go to your paper. I suggest you should research what the people that are making the information you read are affiliated with. What AI projects? Most of the papers you read are biased, out of one single reason. The people behind it are promoting their own products disguised under something they call research. That´s how you do effective marketing today. It will take many more years before AI take over.

You should probably listen to GammaGlobulin.  Or, it you don't believe him, listen to some of industry leaders.  And what you'll find is that most believe that within the next year or so, AI will be doing most if not all of the coding.  At some point, the AI agents will train other AI agents, and the curve becomes exponential.  And from there it's out of control, if we haven't already reached that point.  

 

As for "biased" papers?  Maybe the bias is at your end? Maybe you and people like you want to remain employed and remain relevant.  Casting doubt on AI, and the speed of development is a simple way to hang onto a job, if you ask me.   Remember this scene from Office Space?

 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

1 hour ago, jas007 said:

You should probably listen to GammaGlobulin.

 

Yes.

I think everybody should listen to me, and people like me.

 

[Gottfrid]

3 hours ago, jas007 said:

Maybe you and people like you want to remain employed and remain relevant.

What? Me, want to hang on to a work? Remain employed? You are soo far out in the blue little boy. I am running my own ship, you know. Whatever AI makes any or all code or none, is not of relevance to me. As for me to have relevance. You know, that I have in my wife and my children´s eyes.

Now, as you know so darn much, please explain as you seem to believe you have the knowledge. How id people like me?

[GammaGlobulin]

4 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

I am running my own ship,

 

It is only the HEADING of your ship that I question.

If you mean that we will not have superhuman mechanistic programming by 2027, than I would tend to doubt this.

 

[jas007]

18 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

What? Me, want to hang on to a work? Remain employed? You are soo far out in the blue little boy. I am running my own ship, you know. Whatever AI makes any or all code or none, is not of relevance to me. As for me to have relevance. You know, that I have in my wife and my children´s eyes.

Now, as you know so darn much, please explain as you seem to believe you have the knowledge. How id people like me?

I'm not sure I understood your question. Typo?

 

Anyway, it you're self employed, then you make your own decisions, adjust to what you see, and move forward.  Nothing wrong with that.  If you screw up, it's your problem. 

 

My main point is that the AI world may be progressing faster than you seem to think. That's not unusual. Many people are asleep at the switch, including many investors.  

 

My only interest is to make easy money, and lately, in the world of AI, it's like taking candy from a baby.  Most people don't realize what's coming, and by the time they figure it out, they will have missed the investing opportunity of a lifetime. It's a big deal, and I'm not sure what you can compare it to.  

 

 

 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

27 minutes ago, jas007 said:

My main point is that the AI world may be progressing faster than you seem to think. That's not unusual. Many people are asleep at the switch, including many investors.  

I very much concur.

This is definitely the case, at this particular juncture in human evolution.

 

[Gottfrid]

43 minutes ago, jas007 said:

I'm not sure I understood your question. Typo?

 

Anyway, it you're self employed, then you make your own decisions, adjust to what you see, and move forward.  Nothing wrong with that.  If you screw up, it's your problem. 

 

My main point is that the AI world may be progressing faster than you seem to think. That's not unusual. Many people are asleep at the switch, including many investors.  

 

My only interest is to make easy money, and lately, in the world of AI, it's like taking candy from a baby.  Most people don't realize what's coming, and by the time they figure it out, they will have missed the investing opportunity of a lifetime. It's a big deal, and I'm not sure what you can compare it to.  

 

 

 

 

No problem, I was just replying to your assumption that I would be employed. That happened 2,5 years directly after I stopped my education. Since after that, I have been running my own businesses.

Of course I harness the opportunity of AI. That´s for sure. Like you say, it´s like taking candy from a baby. Not very nice, by the way it sounds, but a big pay check at the end of the rainbow and during the time. For some examples, I am running a re-write service with content spin option based on AI. I have connected AI tools on automated scripts to my many websites and stuff like that. Using AI for prediction of strategies and leverage AI for investment opportunities.

By the sound of it, you seem to be on the gravy train as well. Good luck. But we all know. Luck is not a factor to success. 😉 

[Gottfrid]

1 hour ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

It is only the HEADING of your ship that I question.

If you mean that we will not have superhuman mechanistic programming by 2027, than I would tend to doubt this.

 

We will have. I never said we will not. What I am saying, is that it will not be made to perfection. Who likes errors?

[GammaGlobulin]

21 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

We will have. I never said we will not. What I am saying, is that it will not be made to perfection. Who likes errors?

 

It might very well be the errors that will prove to cause the most danger.

However, very soon, most likely, errors will not be easily detectable.

And, nobody will care, which is another danger.