Jump to content

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Modified Self-Amplifying Ribonucleic Acid (saRNA) Vaccine


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png.012cd306a15569cb3b3f44560b9824e6.png

 

Source: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/6/553

 

= = =

 

Despite the findings (see below), the authors described the vaccine as “well tolerated.” 🤪

Below excerpts speak for themselves (bold added by me to highlight)

3. Results

A total of 212 participants (51% male, n = 109) were screened between December 2021 and April 2022. Of these, 42 participants were enrolled, with 21 initially classified as seronegative and 21 as seropositive for SARS-CoV-2.

3.2. Other Adverse Events

Grade 3 or higher laboratory abnormalities were more frequent after the second vaccination than the first (39 vs. 9) (Table 3), with neutropenia, lymphopenia, and glucose abnormalities being most common. These abnormalities were more prevalent in the SARS-CoV-2 seropositive arm compared to the SARS-CoV-2 seronegative arm after both the first (7 vs. 2) and the second vaccinations (27 vs. 12), with notable differences in thrombocytopenia (first: 4 vs. 0; second: 8 vs. 0). None of the grade 3 or higher clinical AEs or laboratory abnormalities were attributed to the vaccine.
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...