6 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

I think for over 100 years men have been smiling confidently and bemusedly over feminist aspirations. The idea that women could take over seemed so ludicrous that indeed many men indulged feminism, which after all was built on some justified grievances, and supported female equality, the female right to vote, to workk etc.

 

However, what started out as an ostensible movement for "equality" has transformed into a movement of supremacy by stealth. The notion that women are not smart enough, hampered by biology or have some other handicap that prevents them from obtaining political, employment, and professional supremacy is not borne out by reality. 

 

The world over female political leaders have taken over, in countless countries, and obtained the top job, from Europe to Asia to the Americas and Australasia.  In the professions in the West we see them taking over the legal and medical professions. In Scandinavia they have taken over the political positions of power.

 

The Will to Power in the female is strong and if it is given an inch  by soft, gullible and well meaning males, women will reach for power in all areas. Even in Asia, women are no longer content to rule the domestic sphere, but instead aspire to business and political power.

 

Unless we counteract, men will become what females were for the longest time, politically and professionally  subjugated.

So-called wannabe A male excuses 

8 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

I think for over 100 years men have been smiling confidently and bemusedly over feminist aspirations. The idea that women could take over seemed so ludicrous that indeed many men indulged feminism, which after all was built on some justified grievances, and supported female equality, the female right to vote, to workk etc.

 

However, what started out as an ostensible movement for "equality" has transformed into a movement of supremacy by stealth. The notion that women are not smart enough, hampered by biology or have some other handicap that prevents them from obtaining political, employment, and professional supremacy is not borne out by reality. 

 

The world over female political leaders have taken over, in countless countries, and obtained the top job, from Europe to Asia to the Americas and Australasia.  In the professions in the West we see them taking over the legal and medical professions. In Scandinavia they have taken over the political positions of power.

 

The Will to Power in the female is strong and if it is given an inch  by soft, gullible and well meaning males, women will reach for power in all areas. Even in Asia, women are no longer content to rule the domestic sphere, but instead aspire to business and political power.

 

Unless we counteract, men will become what females were for the longest time, politically and professionally  subjugated.

 

Well articulated gibberish.

19 hours ago, Hummin said:

The mob can only bee in charge until someone mobilizes and fight back, then you will see who is the true Alphas who do not hide behind other armed men like the President who never served or did any physical than hit a ball or two. 

 

Just a big mouthy who thinks he is an Alpha, and of course his followers 

 

MAGAs act like a motorbike gang, hiding behind everyone else and think they are the Alphas dont they?

 

Feeling threatened by women ? 😁 Real men are not

 

For you, as a Norwegian, the time to take comfort in frayed old platitudes about "real men" has long gone. It's too late. Your country has already been subject to a takeover by feminists and was one of the first to go. If you think "real men" in Norway should not "feel threatened" by women you're just employing the ostrich bird strategy and sticking your head in the sand so you don't see the obvious:

 

- In Norway feminist politicians have ensured that gender quotas legally prohibit men from sitting on the board of directors of companies, where gender quotas ensure that 40% of those jobs are reserved for women.

- The same gender quotas ensure that 40% of all posts on boards of public, ie government, bodies, are reserved for women.

- Norway is not just waging war on men in Norway, but is also allocating millions of dollars to export its radical gender politics to other countriers in the third world, as part of foreign policy

- "Gender equality" is actively monitored in Norway, meaning privileges for women are funded by the government and situations of "inequality" are actively sought out, yet strangely the "inequaility" has never disappeared. Hmmm.

 

And we should not pretend that Norway is a singular place. It was just one of the first places where men were hoodwinked and deceived with the "equality" lie into facilitating the political, social and labour takeover of women  in the public sphere. No, Norway is not the only place this is happening, and it's not just in Scandinavia either. In almost every developed country in the West feminist politicians are pushing for quotas that mandate that 40% or 50% of jobs on the boards of public companies, or public government bodies, are reserved for women. In the professions law firms that do not have at least 50% of female partners are publicly shamed..

 

Countries that have not yet gone the way of the Scandinavian countries and put gender quotas in place, that are continuously monitored, are losing the fight against the feminists and their takeover demands. Some countries have capitulated already.

 

 

59 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

For you, as a Norwegian, the time to take comfort in frayed old platitudes about "real men" has long gone. It's too late. Your country has already been subject to a takeover by feminists and was one of the first to go. If you think "real men" in Norway should not "feel threatened" by women you're just employing the ostrich bird strategy and sticking your head in the sand so you don't see the obvious:

 

- In Norway feminist politicians have ensured that gender quotas legally prohibit men from sitting on the board of directors of companies, where gender quotas ensure that 40% of those jobs are reserved for women.

- The same gender quotas ensure that 40% of all posts on boards of public, ie government, bodies, are reserved for women.

- Norway is not just waging war on men in Norway, but is also allocating millions of dollars to export its radical gender politics to other countriers in the third world, as part of foreign policy

- "Gender equality" is actively monitored in Norway, meaning privileges for women are funded by the government and situations of "inequality" are actively sought out, yet strangely the "inequaility" has never disappeared. Hmmm.

 

And we should not pretend that Norway is a singular place. It was just one of the first places where men were hoodwinked and deceived with the "equality" lie into facilitating the political, social and labour takeover of women  in the public sphere. No, Norway is not the only place this is happening, and it's not just in Scandinavia either. In almost every developed country in the West feminist politicians are pushing for quotas that mandate that 40% or 50% of jobs on the boards of public companies, or public government bodies, are reserved for women. In the professions law firms that do not have at least 50% of female partners are publicly shamed..

 

Countries that have not yet gone the way of the Scandinavian countries and put gender quotas in place, that are continuously monitored, are losing the fight against the feminists and their takeover demands. Some countries have capitulated already.

 

 

You understand there is a middle way and not necessary to go back to the dark ages to control women?.

 

I do not say Scandinavian model is perfect when considering forced represented mandates, but still better than remove women's rights

18 minutes ago, Hummin said:

You understand there is a middle way

 

No there isn't. You are either on the side of men, or you are on the side of women. In the US now, the gender gap in education is worse than it was in 1972. Back then there was a gender gap in favour of men, who were  13% more likely to get a college degree. Now, it's 15% in favour of women. So when people talk of the gender gap in education now, they mean men. Things are worse than in 1972 now, only the other way round.

 

Again, feminists are not just imposing mandated quota laws for companies and government bodies in Scandinavia, this is happening all over the developed world.

 

We are in the midst of a takeover by feminists. It started in education, went on to politics, and is now under way in business, public government bodies, the law, and medicine.

 

Middle of the road is not an option now, only a counter-attack will re-establish conditions that favour men.

 

 

There are many things that women are good at but voting is not one of them. It is something in their genetic wiring. Women are all about "feelings" and feelings should not be a precursor to a vote. Liberalism is founded on feelings and we all know that liberalism has destroyed many countries, look at England. So I believe that Hegseth recognizes this and is concerned for the United States. It is foolish and naive to think that he will prevent women from voting and just more of the left wing syndrome. 

43 minutes ago, dutch boy said:

There are many things that women are good at but voting is not one of them. It is something in their genetic wiring. Women are all about "feelings" and feelings should not be a precursor to a vote. Liberalism is founded on feelings and we all know that liberalism has destroyed many countries, look at England. So I believe that Hegseth recognizes this and is concerned for the United States. It is foolish and naive to think that he will prevent women from voting and just more of the left wing syndrome. 

And just how many " men" real or imagined gave birth and life to you?

 

You are just another sad male who thinks that they are smarter and better than women.

 

2 minutes ago, billd766 said:

And just how many " men" real or imagined gave birth and life to you?

 

You are just another sad male who thinks that they are smarter and better than women.

 

 

Thank you......I'd just CBA to post the same.

Votes could be restored if the woman bring a bottle of Russian Vodka hey Pete🤔

1 hour ago, dutch boy said:

There are many things that women are good at but voting is not one of them. It is something in their genetic wiring. Women are all about "feelings" and feelings should not be a precursor to a vote. Liberalism is founded on feelings and we all know that liberalism has destroyed many countries, look at England. So I believe that Hegseth recognizes this and is concerned for the United States. It is foolish and naive to think that he will prevent women from voting and just more of the left wing syndrome. 

Im sure men is much better to vote for convicted sly men 

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

No there isn't. You are either on the side of men, or you are on the side of women. In the US now, the gender gap in education is worse than it was in 1972. Back then there was a gender gap in favour of men, who were  13% more likely to get a college degree. Now, it's 15% in favour of women. So when people talk of the gender gap in education now, they mean men. Things are worse than in 1972 now, only the other way round.

 

Again, feminists are not just imposing mandated quota laws for companies and government bodies in Scandinavia, this is happening all over the developed world.

 

We are in the midst of a takeover by feminists. It started in education, went on to politics, and is now under way in business, public government bodies, the law, and medicine.

 

Middle of the road is not an option now, only a counter-attack will re-establish conditions that favour men.

 

 

Well make sure all the black and Hispanic can vote as well, and you are good to go for the next century. Do not forget the convicted once either 

1 hour ago, billd766 said:

And just how many " men" real or imagined gave birth and life to you?

 

You are just another sad male who thinks that they are smarter and better than women.

 

 

Rather than hate on a fellow man you might think about what you're saying, because in reality women NOT having children is one of the key problems of the industrialised world. Not enough future workers are being born, so our economies will die, as will our social services due to a lack of tax payers. And why are women not having children? It's not because of the lack of childcare, billions has been poured into this issue and there is a huge child care infrastructure in most countries. It's not cost. It's because of feminism. Feminism and all the men who support it, have created a world where women can now earn as much, often more, as men earn. So women see no added benefit in entering into a relationship with a man. They will only do so if the man improves their financial position.

 

So your pro-feminist stance has in fact created a problem that could potentially end the world economies and thus the very easy life women enjoy so much.

 

Actually this raises a tantalising possibility, rather than abolish the vote for women entirely, it could be linked to a woman's birth rate. If she has children, she qualifies for the vote. Something to consider.

2 hours ago, billd766 said:

And just how many " men" real or imagined gave birth and life to you?

 

You are just another sad male who thinks that they are smarter and better than women.

 

Unfortunately these sad men gets the life they wanted in Asia where they can find women who obey them as long they can put up with them, but even here many of them fails and still do not get it why it happens to them. 

 

The «Feminism» is actually happening in Asia to now, but most of these gooosers are to old to know, and still chase their ideal women who do not exists anymore

1 hour ago, Hummin said:

Unfortunately these sad men gets the life they wanted in Asia where they can find women who obey them as long they can put up with them, but even here many of them fails and still do not get it why it happens to them. 

 

The «Feminism» is actually happening in Asia to now, but most of these gooosers are to old to know, and still chase their ideal women who do not exists anymore

Wish my woman would obey me.

Sometimes you write poop that makes me think you don't have an Asian wife.

10 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Wish my woman would obey me.

Sometimes you write poop that makes me think you don't have an Asian wife.

 

Oh I have toured for years with other bikers and do have an idea of different people's opinions and how they are doing in their relationships or lack of. 

 

Not only based on bikers either, but people we meet during our travels with or without bikes. However if you travel for a week or more several times, you start to get under the skin to most of them, and see how they really are, and the dynamics in their relationships 

 

Myself have a wife who I can not dictate or make her my way, so I do recognize your experience. Mutual respect and transparency in a relationship is important, not only one way either way.

 

Of course I do see men who is run over by their wife and often her family, and both ends is as wrong as the other. 

 

Anyway you read and see what you want when it comes to my replies, and you seem a bit passive aggressive sometimes. It is not my intention to provoke anyone, but rather express my opinions and my experiences

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Wish my woman would obey me.

Sometimes you write poop that makes me think you don't have an Asian wife.

I don't have a woman nor do I have a wifey, though I do have a wife.

 

I left all that obey crap behind when I left the military years ago. My wife does NOT need to obey me. She is perfectly capable of thinking and acting on her own.  I ask her to do things, but a lot of the time, she is ahead of my requests anyway. Ordering her is simply a male form of control and totally unnecessary. Asking is a much simpler and easier way of getting things done.