1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

LOL, I dont need to "prove" anything. It speaks for itself. Whoever takes the time to read it and knows how US Federal Criminal Law works can make their own judgement. Any comment from you is meaningless. Take from that as you will, Socialist.

 

I will repeat. Comey is cooked. You can draw your own conclusion if you think for yourself.

You can repeat it all you like. But given your refusal to provide any evidence from the text, it's overwhelmingly likely that either you haven't read it or that there's nothing in there that addresses my points. 

And even if were a person who believed that government should control the means of production, in other words, a socialist, what has that got to do with this case?

On 11/4/2025 at 11:30 AM, Yagoda said:

LOL, I dont need to "prove" anything. It speaks for itself. Whoever takes the time to read it and knows how US Federal Criminal Law works can make their own judgement. Any comment from you is meaningless. Take from that as you will, Socialist.

 

I will repeat. Comey is cooked. You can draw your own conclusion if you think for yourself.

This comment of yours hasn't aged well. You might want to consider outsourcing your thinking to others.

5 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

This comment of yours hasn't aged well. You might want to consider outsourcing your thinking to others.

As of today official status US v Comey

 

Date Filed: Sept. 25, 2025

Date Terminated: Nov. 24, 2025

 

US says it will appeal based upon 'proper' Halligan appointment, or as per My Cousin Vinny

 

"Everything that (judge)  just said is bullsh*t"

15 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

This comment of yours hasn't aged well. You might want to consider outsourcing your thinking to others.

I prefer to think for myself as opposed to being Charlie McCarthy

12 hours ago, Yagoda said:

I prefer to think for myself as opposed to being Charlie McCarthy

But why share such blatantly ridiculous thoughts with others?