Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump Signs Bill Requiring Epstein Files Released in 30 Days

Featured Replies

ot-pardons.webp

Picture courtesy of CBS News

 

President Trump has signed a bill mandating the release of files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein within 30 days. This move follows widespread controversy and bipartisan support, as both the House and Senate passed the bill with overwhelming majorities. Trump made the announcement via his Truth Social post, criticising prominent Democrats associated with Epstein.

 

The decision comes after months of public demand for transparency regarding Epstein's connections and activities. Epstein, who was convicted of sex offences, has been a contentious figure, with many high-profile individuals allegedly linked to his scandalous past. The bill's passage received near-unanimous approval, indicating significant consensus on the issue.

 

Experts predict the release of these files could shed light on unexplored aspects of Epstein's network and potentially uncover new information about those involved. Trump’s statement suggests that the revelations might focus on Democratic figures, fuelled by speculation about their political ramifications. This development could dramatically alter public perception and lead to further investigations.

 

With the files scheduled for release within a month, attention now turns to the Justice Department’s preparations. The forthcoming documents are expected to attract intense media scrutiny and public interest. Observers are keen to see how these revelations might impact ongoing legal proceedings and political discourse, reported CBS News.

 

 

 

Key Takeaways

 

  • President Trump signed a bill mandating the release of Epstein files within 30 days.
  • The bill passed with near-unanimous support in Congress amid public demand for transparency.
  • Experts anticipate significant developments from the release, focusing on possible political implications.


Related Stories:

Epstein File Release Moves to Senate After 427–1 House Vote

Epstein Files: Trump Informed Months Ago His Name Is Included

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from CBS News 2025-11-20

 

 

image.png

 

image.png

Good!let the chips fall were they may!Part of me knows old Donnie is scheming and plotting against releasing them no doubt about that lol 

  • Popular Post

What Will Not Be Released

 

Survivors’ personal information (names, addresses, medical/psychological records)......fair enough

 

Classified national security material (intelligence sources, methods, or sensitive foreign relations content)......who makes that classification?

 

Grand jury materials protected by law unless separately ordered by a court......as is normally the case.

 

 

Other sensitive data where disclosure could endanger ongoing investigations.......hmmmmm

  • Popular Post
43 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

What Will Not Be Released

 

Survivors’ personal information (names, addresses, medical/psychological records)......fair enough

 

Classified national security material (intelligence sources, methods, or sensitive foreign relations content)......who makes that classification?

 

Grand jury materials protected by law unless separately ordered by a court......as is normally the case.

 

 

Other sensitive data where disclosure could endanger ongoing investigations.......hmmmmm

Ongoing investigations will be the "biggie", immediate and most obvious one. That said it is worth noting that Mr Squeaker Johnson mentioned, before the vote, that there would be national security concerns - and that is a jolly useful catch 22 - not releasing certain material due to "national security concerns" of course means not identifying or discussing what is not being released due to umh, "national security concerns". This has to run for at least 3 years!

National security concerns mean the prez connect be mentioned, eh.

I thought the courts had ordered the released not Trump.. :coffee1:

As Epstein was a professional financial advisor, will the net catch innocent investors?

On 11/20/2025 at 9:11 AM, webfact said:

Experts predict the release of these files could shed light on unexplored aspects of Epstein's network and potentially uncover new information about those involved.

Besides the Epstein files that the DOJ has to release, there are various documents from many sources that will be impactful to legal proceedings and political ramtification. 

- US Congress House Oversight Committee have thousand of pages of documents from the Estate.

- Epstein Estate still has a treasure trove of legal files and documents

- Victims legal team that have court preceedings with GMaxwell 

- Jounalists and organisations who have acquired some documents like emails, flight logs etc

- Financial institutions that holds Epstein transactional records

- Warden and staffs at NY City jail where Epstein die

- There are also digitalized copy of Epstein files and FBI agents who worked on the files should Bondi inflict heavy hands to obscure information

 

This is a pivoting point for Trump's political and criminal future. 

On 11/20/2025 at 2:10 PM, Will B Good said:

What Will Not Be Released

 

Survivors’ personal information (names, addresses, medical/psychological records)......fair enough

 

Classified national security material (intelligence sources, methods, or sensitive foreign relations content)......who makes that classification?

 

Grand jury materials protected by law unless separately ordered by a court......as is normally the case.

 

 

Other sensitive data where disclosure could endanger ongoing investigations.......hmmmmm

Thank you, Sir Humphrey.

I suspect that those who are anticipating lurid revelations are going to be disappointed. 

On 11/20/2025 at 10:56 AM, Tug said:

Good!let the chips fall were they may!Part of me knows old Donnie is scheming and plotting against releasing them no doubt about that lol 

Haha can't wait to see what they say about Clinton and Prince Edwards. 

I would guess that Trump already knows what is in the files and therefore knows there may be innuendo but no direct comments that would instigate crimes against him. It is not illegal or immoral to see and talk to someone who is unknowingly committing crimes. About the worse thing i have heard or read about is Trump walking into a glass door whilst looking at girls at the pool.. Nothing more than that.. And that does not make him a bad person. That just makes him a man who sees pretty half naked  and sexy young women. 

He called Nixon stupid for not burning evidence against him. Do you think he and his minions will hand over incriminating evidence. Most likely they’ve been destroyed already. 

27 minutes ago, AustinRacing said:

He called Nixon stupid for not burning evidence against him. Do you think he and his minions will hand over incriminating evidence. Most likely they’ve been destroyed already. 

that will be obstruction of justice and 20 years sentencing. Pray he does that. He need to be put away for good. 

    30 days should give them enough time to remove everything damaging to Trump and put it in the 'National Security Concerns' top secret file.

On 11/21/2025 at 2:50 PM, thesetat said:

Haha can't wait to see what they say about Clinton and Prince Edwards. 

I would guess that Trump already knows what is in the files and therefore knows there may be innuendo but no direct comments that would instigate crimes against him. It is not illegal or immoral to see and talk to someone who is unknowingly committing crimes. About the worse thing i have heard or read about is Trump walking into a glass door whilst looking at girls at the pool.. Nothing more than that.. And that does not make him a bad person. That just makes him a man who sees pretty half naked  and sexy young women. 

You need to read more or perhaps the civil rape case or him saying when you're famous you're allowed to walk into dressing rooms or " grab them by the pussy" doesn't count 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.