Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Nato Alarm as Trump Weighs Military Grab of Greenland

Featured Replies

screenshot_3547.jpg

US President Donald Trump is reportedly exploring "a range of options" to acquire Greenland, including potential military involvement, according to the White House. The acquisition is deemed a "national security priority" following Trump's recent remarks affirming the necessity of controlling Greenland for security reasons.

Trump's renewed interest in Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark and fellow Nato member, has stirred reactions among European allies. On Tuesday, countries rallied in Denmark's support as Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned of potential consequences for Nato if the US pursues its ambitions aggressively. The White House reaffirmed the President's commitment to various strategies, stating that military involvement remains an option under consideration.

This development emerges after the US military intervention in Venezuela, where elite forces detained President Nicolás Maduro to face charges in New York. In the aftermath, Katie Miller posted a social media picture depicting Greenland in American colours, indicating the USA's intentions. Her husband, Stephen Miller, a senior aide to Trump, later confirmed that integrating Greenland into the US aligns with formal government objectives for strengthening Arctic security and Nato interests.

In a CNN interview, Stephen Miller emphasised the US's pivotal role within Nato and argued for the strategic inclusion of Greenland. When questioned about the possibility of using force, Miller suggested that resistance against the US over Greenland's future seemed unlikely, reported the BBC.

Key Takeaways

  • Trump's government prioritises Greenland's acquisitions for security reasons.

  • Denmark and European allies express concern over military options.

  • The US emphasises NATO security and Arctic control as its strategic goals.

Related Stories:

NATO is finished if Trump takes Greenland

Hands Off Greenland! Danish PM Blasts Trump Threats

image.png  

Adapted by ASEAN Now from [source] 2026-01-07

 

image.png

 

image.png

  • Replies 36
  • Views 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • JBChiangRai
    JBChiangRai

    I'm seeing no difference between Russia and the USA at this point

  • GoodieAfterDark
    GoodieAfterDark

    More distraction from the Epstein Files.

  • klauskunkel
    klauskunkel

    I think the removal of Trump should be deemed a "national security priority"

Posted Images

  • Popular Post

I'm seeing no difference between Russia and the USA at this point

  • Popular Post

Right. Someone try to convince us Trump is not working from the Russian playbook

  • Popular Post

The World According The Trump

Screenshot from 2026-01-07 10-07-03.png

  • Popular Post

More distraction from the Epstein Files.

Not going to happen.

^^^ I dunno, not as far fetched as you think. Plus he's gotta do his worst before he gets impeached.

  • Popular Post
On 1/7/2026 at 4:37 AM, webfact said:

The acquisition is deemed a "national security priority"

I think the removal of Trump should be deemed a "national security priority"

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, klauskunkel said:

I think the removal of Trump should be deemed an "international security priority"

Fixed it

On 1/7/2026 at 10:07 AM, connda said:

The World According The Trump

Screenshot from 2026-01-07 10-07-03.png

Orwell's "1984" scenario ...

Trump is by no means the first President to want to take over Greenland.

5 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Trump is by no means the first President to want to take over Greenland.

And your point is?

Will the US military go along with this?

Relax folks. 3 options available:

a) The 57'000 inhabitants will get to vote concerning the matter.

b) Denmark will turn over any military necesseties to the US. (Whatever the US deems necessary).

c) Donald will make a financial offer to the residing Greenlanders that they can not refuse.

c) in combination with a), of course.

1 hour ago, swissie said:

Relax folks. 3 options available:

a) The 57'000 inhabitants will get to vote concerning the matter.

b) Denmark will turn over any military necesseties to the US. (Whatever the US deems necessary).

c) Donald will make a financial offer to the residing Greenlanders that they can not refuse.

c) in combination with a), of course.

In that case (if Greenlanders' votes can be bought) Greenland will go to the highest bidder. Maybe not the USA, but a consortium of wealthy countries or billionaires.

(or a few trillionaires)

/s

11 hours ago, RayC said:

And your point is?

My point is that Trump is by no means the first President to want to take over Greenland.

20 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

My point is that Trump is by no means the first President to want to take over Greenland.

So that is meant to justify and legitimatise Trump's actions?

10 hours ago, RayC said:

So that is meant to justify and legitimatise Trump's actions?

Not at all, merely to point out that his views on Greenland are not unique. BTW as far as I am aware no 'actions' have been taken on this issue.

On 1/8/2026 at 2:28 AM, klauskunkel said:

I think the removal of Trump should be deemed a "national security priority"

Not just a national security priority a world security priority.

16 hours ago, chickenslegs said:

In that case (if Greenlanders' votes can be bought) Greenland will go to the highest bidder. Maybe not the USA, but a consortium of wealthy countries or billionaires.

(or a few trillionaires)

/s

Why buy when you can steal with no consequences?

  • Popular Post
4 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Not at all, merely to point out that his views on Greenland are not unique. BTW as far as I am aware no 'actions' have been taken on this issue.

Threatening to invade a country which does not pose a threat is never justified. The fact that Trump's views may not be unique is irrelevant.

In a similar vein, the fact that Trump has not yet carried out his threat is also irrelevant. His words have already undermined the world order.

The Trump administration, a wolf that has thrown off its sheep's clothing, has resurrected an aggressive Monroe Doctrine, for which has been coined the term the Donroe Doctrine.

Its purpose is to preserve the Americas – North, South, and Central – as the exclusive preserve of the United States. Canada, Greenland, and – let it be noted - Antarctica are all included in this hemisphere. The countries in this zone may be required to export exclusively to the United States, and their inward foreign investments are to come solely from the U.S. The U.S. administration has also declared its intention to dominate outer space, which it seems to think is rich in valuable minerals.

China, Russia and Iran are named as hostile to the U.S. and therefore to be excluded from the American hemisphere. But this is just the beginning. The rest of the world – particularly European countries with deluded leaders living in the past - needs to wake up.

What the Trump Government is attempting can succeed. If it does it will likely lead to a divided U.S.-dominated world of severely restricted freedoms; despite vote-catching calls to the contrary. Increasing human fulfilment needs more freedom, not less.

The threat from Trump & Co. can be countered by the countries of the Eurasian and African continents finding common ground [i.e. mutually beneficial] and following the U.S. example. Exclude the U.S. from their resources and markets. This could cause Trump to hesitate in what he is doing. But if he does not, what he gains in one hand he loses from the other.

There are currently violent divisions within the Eurasian and African continents. Many of these have been engineered by the global hegemon and its satellites, for whose oligarchs war means enrichment, in part by sucking up tax-money collected from the working population. The hegemon is now telling its poodles to go fend for themselves. Nonetheless it will doubtlessly try to keep them on a leash.

Many seemingly insoluble conflicts can assuredly be resolved by excluding all threat of force, seeking to understand the various conflicts of interest and the oft-manufactured fears; then reaching mutually beneficial agreements ("win-win").

We need to build a better world. Very different from the neofeudal one envisaged by the W.E.F.

  • Popular Post

Screenshot_20260109-231651.jpg

Trump needs Greenland to cement his 'legacy'. He's thinking of Teddy Roosevelt, the last great Republican president. Roosevelt used military intervention in Panama, he sent a battle cruiser in case the Columbians had any ideas to reclaim their territory. The battle cruiser never had to fire a shot. Can Trump take Greenland without firing a shot? Maybe.

5 minutes ago, Real Name Hidden said:

Trump needs Greenland to cement his 'legacy'. He's thinking of Teddy Roosevelt, the last great Republican president. Roosevelt used military intervention in Panama, he sent a battle cruiser in case the Columbians had any ideas to reclaim their territory. The battle cruiser never had to fire a shot. Can Trump take Greenland without firing a shot? Maybe.

I think he could take Greenland without firing a shot, but it's imperative he is made to fight for it, doing so may see him impeached and also stands up to his bullying.

You must always stand up to a bully, other countries handled his tariffs in a way that emboldened him.

This could be a repeat of when the British appeased Hitler by allowing him to take Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland region to under the Munich Agreement of 1938

Just now, JBChiangRai said:

I think he could take Greenland without firing a shot, but it's imperative he is made to fight for it, doing so may see him impeached and also stands up to his bullying.

You must always stand up to a bully, other countries handled his tariffs in a way that emboldened him.

This could be a repeat of when the British appeased Hitler by allowing him to take Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland region to under the Munich Agreement of 1938

Yes, Roosevelt coined the 'bully pulpit', Trump dropped the pulpit.

12 hours ago, RayC said:

Threatening to invade a country which does not pose a threat is never justified. The fact that Trump's views may not be unique is irrelevant.

In a similar vein, the fact that Trump has not yet carried out his threat is also irrelevant. His words have already undermined the world order.

'Undermined the world order' ?

A slight exaggeration methinks.

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, Thingamabob said:

'Undermined the world order' ?

A slight exaggeration methinks.

I don't think it's an exaggeration.

Everything has changed.

Larger, more powerful countries can now pray on smaller ones.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.