Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Ocasio-Cortez Leaves Door Open to 2028 Presidential Run

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has declined to rule out a potential run for the White House in 2028, saying her political goals are focused on broader national change rather than holding a particular office.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The New York Democrat made the remarks during a Friday event in Chicago when she was asked about speculation surrounding a possible presidential campaign.

Responding to the question from Democratic strategist David Axelrod, Ocasio-Cortez rejected the suggestion that her ambitions were tied to seeking a specific title or position.

Remarks Fuel Questions About Future Bid

“They assume that my ambition is a title or a seat, and my ambition is way bigger than that,” she said. “My ambition is to change this country.”

She added that while elected officials may come and go, policies such as single-payer healthcare can have lasting impact.

Ocasio-Cortez said she bases her political decisions on current circumstances rather than long-term plans tied to a particular role.

“Conditions change radically all the time,” she said, explaining that she evaluates the political landscape day by day to determine which actions might help advance her policy goals.

3500.webp

Decisions Guided by ‘Conditions’

The congresswoman, who is serving her fourth term in the House of Representatives, said she seeks to make decisions that move the country “closer to that future, stronger, faster, better than yesterday.”

Her comments come amid growing discussion about possible Democratic candidates in the 2028 presidential race.

Democrats Eye Possible Contenders

Several Democratic figures are already being mentioned as potential contenders to return the party to the White House in 2028.

Among those frequently cited are Gavin Newsom, governor of California; former vice president Kamala Harris; Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer; former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg; Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro; and Kentucky governor Andy Beshear.

Illinois governor JB Pritzker recently praised what he described as the Democratic Party’s strong bench of possible candidates.

Speaking at an event in New York, Pritzker said he was focused on winning re-election as governor but stressed his commitment to helping the party reclaim the presidency.

“We have a pretty good bench,” he said, adding that he intends to work to elect a Democrat in 2028.

Republican Field Also Taking Shape

On the Republican side, several figures are also seen as potential successors to Donald Trump after his second term.

Among those widely viewed as possible candidates are Vice President J. D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Trump himself has at times suggested he might seek a third term, despite the limit set by the Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which restricts presidents to two terms in office.

The president’s business organization, the Trump Organization, introduced “Trump 2028” hats last April, and Trump later told reporters he would “love to” run again.

Speculation Likely to Continue

While Ocasio-Cortez did not confirm any presidential ambitions, her comments left open the possibility of a future bid as discussion about the 2028 race continues within both major political parties.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 10 May 2026


View full article

  • Replies 124
  • Views 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • MikeandDow
    MikeandDow

    By-far "Superior" than what you yanks have now! young go getter

  • Eric Loh
    Eric Loh

    Republicans are struggling to find women of AOC caliber in Congress and leadership position. Trump see strong charismatic and intelligent woman as a threat.

  • MikeandDow
    MikeandDow

    Again Another stupid post from you full of self assumptions how do you know she is low IQ ?? how do you know as a fact that she thinks the American revolution was a revolution from the left just rubbi

Posted Images

  • Popular Post

Harris as a running mate, wouldn't that be a hoot 🙄

"Do you think WW 12 could be avoided ?"

... "We're open for that discussion in the future"

Edited by KhunLA

  • Popular Post
3 hours ago, webfact said:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has declined to rule out a potential run for the White House in 2028, saying her political goals are focused on broader national change rather than holding a particular office.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The New York Democrat made the remarks during a Friday event in Chicago when she was asked about speculation surrounding a possible presidential campaign.

Responding to the question from Democratic strategist David Axelrod, Ocasio-Cortez rejected the suggestion that her ambitions were tied to seeking a specific title or position.

Remarks Fuel Questions About Future Bid

“They assume that my ambition is a title or a seat, and my ambition is way bigger than that,” she said. “My ambition is to change this country.”

She added that while elected officials may come and go, policies such as single-payer healthcare can have lasting impact.

Ocasio-Cortez said she bases her political decisions on current circumstances rather than long-term plans tied to a particular role.

“Conditions change radically all the time,” she said, explaining that she evaluates the political landscape day by day to determine which actions might help advance her policy goals.

3500.webp

Decisions Guided by ‘Conditions’

The congresswoman, who is serving her fourth term in the House of Representatives, said she seeks to make decisions that move the country “closer to that future, stronger, faster, better than yesterday.”

Her comments come amid growing discussion about possible Democratic candidates in the 2028 presidential race.

Democrats Eye Possible Contenders

Several Democratic figures are already being mentioned as potential contenders to return the party to the White House in 2028.

Among those frequently cited are Gavin Newsom, governor of California; former vice president Kamala Harris; Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer; former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg; Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro; and Kentucky governor Andy Beshear.

Illinois governor JB Pritzker recently praised what he described as the Democratic Party’s strong bench of possible candidates.

Speaking at an event in New York, Pritzker said he was focused on winning re-election as governor but stressed his commitment to helping the party reclaim the presidency.

“We have a pretty good bench,” he said, adding that he intends to work to elect a Democrat in 2028.

Republican Field Also Taking Shape

On the Republican side, several figures are also seen as potential successors to Donald Trump after his second term.

Among those widely viewed as possible candidates are Vice President J. D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Trump himself has at times suggested he might seek a third term, despite the limit set by the Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which restricts presidents to two terms in office.

The president’s business organization, the Trump Organization, introduced “Trump 2028” hats last April, and Trump later told reporters he would “love to” run again.

Speculation Likely to Continue

While Ocasio-Cortez did not confirm any presidential ambitions, her comments left open the possibility of a future bid as discussion about the 2028 race continues within both major political parties.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 10 May 2026


View full article

By-far "Superior" than what you yanks have now! young go getter

  • Popular Post

She's definitely "low IQ". She thinks the American revolution was a revolution from the left where in actual fact it was chiefly from the Founding Fathers.

Edited by dinsdale

  • Popular Post

I think it will be Bernie on the top of the ticket and AOC as VP.

I think the left could do worse. She has a kind mouth.

  • Popular Post
15 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

She's definitely "low IQ". She thinks the American revolution was a revolution from the left where in actual fact it was chiefly from the Founding Fathers.

Again Another stupid post from you full of self assumptions how do you know she is low IQ ?? how do you know as a fact that she thinks the American revolution was a revolution from the left just rubbish !!

Edited by MikeandDow

  • Popular Post

Republicans are struggling to find women of AOC caliber in Congress and leadership position. Trump see strong charismatic and intelligent woman as a threat.

  • Popular Post
11 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Republicans are struggling to find women of AOC caliber in Congress and leadership position. Trump see strong charismatic and intelligent woman as a threat.

What are these claims based on?

  • Popular Post

24 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

Again Another stupid post from you full of self assumptions how do you know she is low IQ ?? how do you know as a fact that she thinks the American revolution was a revolution from the left just rubbish !!

"The American Revolution was against the billionaires of their time." (13:24) A quote from an interview she did with The University of Chicago Institute of Politics. Odd I always thought the American Revolution was against the colonizers that being Great Britain and was formed from the actions of the Founding Fathers. They were the elites of the time.

Edited by dinsdale

22 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What are these claims based on?

Facts not claims. A major handicap winning female votes in elections.

  • Popular Post
3 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Facts not claims. A major handicap winning female votes in elections.

Oh, I forgot, when a leftist makes a claim, they consider them facts.

So, what are these "facts" based on?

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh, I forgot, when a leftist makes a claim, they consider them facts.

So, what are these "facts" based on?

Still in your bubble state of denial. Polls highlight huge challenge for the Republican Party to win female votes with Trump being the biggest liability. But I like the GOP to keep their head in the sand mentality

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

She's definitely "low IQ". She thinks the American revolution was a revolution from the left where in actual fact it was chiefly from the Founding Fathers.

Well of course, compared to the current incumbent's deep understanding of the American Revolution ( capturing airports anyone ) and his deeply held respect and devoted adherence to the constitutional principles it produced...

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

"The American Revolution was against the billionaires of their time." (13:24) A quote from an interview she did with The University of Chicago Institute of Politics. Odd I always thought the American Revolution was against the colonizers that being Great Britain and was formed from the actions of the Founding Fathers. They were the elites of the time.

Well she was correct !! if you cannot understand what she said i pity you !!

1 hour ago, mordothailand said:

She might be right !! if we do nothing against climate change it might end in 12 years seems to be insightfull

  • Popular Post

No, no, no. The Dems need to find a centrist candidate and they need to stay away from the progressives. They need to find somebody that a large plurality of Americans can relate to, trust, depend on, and she is not that person. Neither is Harris. And I certainly have my doubts about Newsom, though I would prefer him over Trump or Vance.

The dems really need to do some serious rebuilding and come up with some viable candidates, or 2028 is a lost cause.

  • Popular Post
11 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

No, no, no. The Dems need to find a centrist candidate and they need to stay away from the progressives. They need to find somebody that a large plurality of Americans can relate to, trust, depend on, and she is not that person. Neither is Harris. And I certainly have my doubts about Newsom, though I would prefer him over Trump or Vance.

The dems really need to do some serious rebuilding and come up with some viable candidates, or 2028 is a lost cause.

There is nothing wrong with a progressive young go getter, she’s effectively addressing the issues on voters’ minds right now.  she could bring out the best of America you guys need to get away from the old set, look at the mess trump has caused

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

Still in your bubble state of denial. Polls highlight huge challenge for the Republican Party to win female votes with Trump being the biggest liability. But I like the GOP to keep their head in the sand mentality

Still waiting for you to support you made up "facts"/

2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

"The American Revolution was against the billionaires of their time." (13:24) A quote from an interview she did with The University of Chicago Institute of Politics. Odd I always thought the American Revolution was against the colonizers that being Great Britain and was formed from the actions of the Founding Fathers. They were the elites of the time.

Hm. Not sure if you're referring to the Brit businessmen or Americans as elite, or both.

The Brit movers-and-shakers of that time were fabulously rich, definitely the billionaires of their time.

Was the American Revolution only about liberty from England? Don't think so. It was very much about keeping the dough in the USA. Not much has changed, eh.

I'd like nothing better than to see a democratic socialist running for president.

But unlike egalitation countries which actually think women are capable of the highest office, the US is stuck in Leave It to Beaver, Ozzie and Harriet, Lucy & Ricky tradwives.

Indiana has already proven Trumpsters are still true believers. Nothing about the price of eggs or gas is going to sway that, even if they're homeless.

The Dems have not fixed themselves since Kamala. I would prefer to see a third-party or independent candidate be a viable contender instead of this dreary game Yanqs are in.

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, MikeandDow said:

Well she was correct !! if you cannot understand what she said i pity you !!

She said that the American Revolution was against the 'billionaires' at the time. My question to you is ... was it? Keep in mind on the US side were people like Franklin, Washington, Jefferson and Adams. Very rich and very powerful people of which AOC's message was all about resistance and change. Interesting she didn't mention Soros.

Here's a rhetorical question. Was the American Revolution a fight against the 'billionaires' of the time as AOC clearly stated? Obviously the answer is NO. She's an idiot. Harris is an idiot. Newsom is just a flat out lying politician and an idiot.

Edited by dinsdale

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, MikeandDow said:

There is nothing wrong with a progressive young go getter, she’s effectively addressing the issues on voters’ minds right now.  she could bring out the best of America you guys need to get away from the old set, look at the mess trump has caused

I'm in total agreement that America needs big change, I just want a candidate who will appeal to the masses. I just don't see a progressive appealing to the Midwest, nor the conservatives. AOC is smart and articulate but she totally dropped her game during her recent International appearance, and I'm not sure that she's ready for prime time. I think a lot of other people feel the same way.

Let's give her another decade and see how she matures.

1 minute ago, spidermike007 said:

I'm in total agreement that America needs big change, I just want a candidate who will appeal to the masses. I just don't see a progressive appealing to the Midwest, nor the conservatives. AOC is smart and articulate but she totally dropped her game during her recent International appearance, and I'm not sure that she's ready for prime time. I think a lot of other people feel the same way.

Let's give her another decade and see how she matures.

I am not a Yank !! i can only give my view point as a outsider looking in ! and i think AOC is a very astute person has some faults like everyone but it is up to you guys who know more, but i think you need youthful candidates not the old worn out people you have in the present and the past

2 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

I am not a Yank !! i can only give my view point as a outsider looking in ! and i think AOC is a very astute person has some faults like everyone but it is up to you guys who know more, but i think you need youthful candidates not the old worn out people you have in the present and the past

What is the benefit of a president being young?

2 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

I am not a Yank !! i can only give my view point as a outsider looking in ! and i think AOC is a very astute person has some faults like everyone but it is up to you guys who know more, but i think you need youthful candidates not the old worn out people you have in the present and the past

Again I'm in agreement with you and I would prefer a youthful candidate. However a lot of Democrats were really turned off by the movement catering to the progressives last time around, and that's one of the reasons why they did so poorly. It's really important that they choose a character with centrist credentials who is considered quite moderate. AOC is not that person. She is a progressive and she's quite far to the left.

41 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

She said that the American Revolution was against the 'billionaires' at the time. My question to you is ... was it? Keep in mind on the US side were people like Franklin, Washington, Jefferson and Adams. Very rich and very powerful people of which AOC's message was all about resistance and change. Interesting she didn't mention Soros.

Here's a rhetorical question. Was the American Revolution a fight against the 'billionaires' of the time as AOC clearly stated? Obviously the answer is NO. She's an idiot. Harris is an idiot. Newsom is just a flat out lying politician and an idiot.

your comments showcase your lack of ability to put events into historical context. Common maga trait. It’s really not a hard comparison to understand unless you’re acting like an idiot !!

11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What is the benefit of a president being young?

well you dont seem to get it !

A younger president often brings fresh perspectives, increased energy, and a greater willingness to embrace bold change, making them more receptive to innovative ideas and long-term planning. They can better relate to the technological and social shifts affecting future generations, often acting as inspiring, forward-looking leaders who energize younger voters or would you prefer president like the madman trump ??

3 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

Still in your bubble state of denial. Polls highlight huge challenge for the Republican Party to win female votes with Trump being the biggest liability. But I like the GOP to keep their head in the sand mentality

They are addressing that problem, as only they know how; one of the major effects of the voter registrations in the "Save" act will be to make it considerably more practically difficult for married women ( particularly relatively newly married ones, who have taken their husband's surnames ) to register to vote!

5 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

well you dont seem to get it !

A younger president often brings fresh perspectives, increased energy, and a greater willingness to embrace bold change, making them more receptive to innovative ideas and long-term planning. They can better relate to the technological and social shifts affecting future generations, often acting as inspiring, forward-looking leaders who energize younger voters or would you prefer president like the madman trump ??

You believe a person that is 20 is a lot wiser and would make better president, than that same person would at 60?

What "bold change"? Did you like any of Trump's attempts at bold chang? In the US, "bold change" is meant to be difficult.

What is the benefit of younger voters being energized?

I still wake up every day happy Harris did not win. I would rather it had been DeSantis, but it is what it is.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.