20 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

It seems like he already has. Don seems to have the coherence and articulation level of 94 year old. And declining fast. He is a clear and present danger to America and the world.

What's your take on this?

8 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

What's your take on this?

It seems like there are a lot of Trump supporters that can't wrap their minds around the fact that Trump is currently the president, not Biden, not Obama, and certainly not Clinton.

So he is responsible for his own actions as president right now and somehow his supporters need to take responsibility for the fact that they voted him in, and he's performing all kinds of crazy acts.

9 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Maybe fake news consumers crippled with irrational hatred for the guy should stop trying to assassinate him then? Thd left seem like a weird death cult at this stage. What is it 3 or 4 assassination attempts now and dozrns of posts calling for his death every day?

Reprogramming needed urgently for team hate.

There’s nothing irrational in hating Trump. He’s destroyed countless lives, the economy, the nation’s standing on the world stage, relationships with allies, trust in America.

Everything Trump touches dies.

But please don’t count me in those wanting him to drop dead, I want him to linger over the matter.

1 hour ago, rattlesnake said:

The Syndrome is strong, I see.

The stench is:

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/jul/17/the-guy-stinks-and-hes-a-racist-anthony-scaramucci-on-donald-trump

3 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Dementia and strokes are also old people problems. Dear leader has those too.

Let's compare Biden and Trump when talking about dementia shall we. As for having strokes this is an insane comment. Have you ever known or seen a stroke victim?

1 hour ago, rattlesnake said:

What's your take on this?

What's wrong with an old man being civil and enjoying himself? Nothing like Trump who can't enjoy himself unless he is the center of attention.

Edited May 27May 27 by Hawaiian

2 hours ago, JT25 said:

Take your choice of about 35 of them

List them.

43 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

List them.

I didn't know i was your secretary.

8 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

There's no question that this man is 79 going on 90, and he looks more feeble every time we see him. He can barely even walk up and down stairs anymore. His health is declining both physically and mentally, as he's increasingly incoherent and his rambling is non-stop.

Doesn't he still play golf? You have to be fairly fit/mobile to do that.

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

3 hours ago, JT25 said:

Take your choice of about 35 of them

List them.

How about this, took me 5 seconds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_trial_of_Donald_Trump_in_New_York

2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Let's compare Biden and Trump when talking about dementia shall we. As for having strokes this is an insane comment. Have you ever known or seen a stroke victim?

Ignoring facts does nothing for your case.

Edited May 28May 28 by cjinchiangrai

3 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

What's your take on this?

Biden isn't the president, however he is still far more coherent than the felon in chief.

2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Let's compare Biden and Trump when talking about dementia shall we. As for having strokes this is an insane comment. Have you ever known or seen a stroke victim?

Let’s not.

Biden isn’t the President, much less the topic of discussion.

15 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Biden isn't the president, however he is still far more coherent than the felon in chief.

And if he was (president) US would be in a much better place than it is today, mainly because the President wouldn't be surrounded by completely incompetent arse-licking useless, drug affected, brain damaged booze rattled no-hopers.

25 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Let’s not.

Biden isn’t the President, much less the topic of discussion.

The Democratic Party and the MSM covered this up. IMO this is of historical importance and is pertinent to the present. Lie then and lie now.

47 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

How about this, took me 5 seconds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_trial_of_Donald_Trump_in_New_York

As soon as I see Wikipedia I see a leftist source. It's also interesting that these were misdemeanor charges upgraded to felonies in a clear act of weaponising the justice system.

Edited May 28May 28 by dinsdale

9 hours ago, CallumWK said:

\

You don't say. Wonder why you on the ignore list of many, as most jew lovers are?

It is interesting that telling that you are using the old favourite slogan of neo nazi groups and extremist right wing groups that is now embraced by extreme left wing groups. Tell us what you really think of jews and the people who "love them".

7 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

As soon as I see Wikipedia I see a leftist source. It's also interesting that these were misdemeanor charges upgraded to felonies in a clear act of weaponising the legal system.

How about this? Are the courts also leftist?

https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFs/press/PDFs/People%20v.%20DJT%20Clayton%20Decision.pdf

11 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Are the courts also leftist?

This can't be a serious question surely. US courts are stacked full of activist judges.

42 minutes ago, Artisi said:

And if he was (president) US would be in a much better place than it is today, mainly because the President wouldn't be surrounded by completely incompetent arse-licking useless, drug affected, brain damaged booze rattled no-hopers.

This is so devolved from reality it's not funny. Biden was POTUS but he wasn't in charge.

5 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

This is so devolved from reality it's not funny. Biden was POTUS but he wasn't in charge.

And neither is the idiot currently in the chair, controlled by Putin, Bibi and other idiots in his own country.

12 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

This can't be a serious question surely. US courts are stacked full of activist judges.

When political leaders personally attack judges simply for ruling against their preferred policies, they undermine the legitimacy of an independent judiciary. These attacks aren’t merely words – they’re increasingly accompanied by concrete executive and legislative efforts to strip courts of jurisdiction, pack benches with ideological allies, or even impeach judges for their legal reasoning.

This erosion of judicial independence strikes at the heart of constitutional system of checks and balances. Without courts empowered to review and potentially invalidate unconstitutional actions, the executive and legislative branches face few constraints on their power.

This is the start of the downfall of America !

25 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

This can't be a serious question surely. US courts are stacked full of activist judges.

How about the SCOTUS stacked with Trump's appointees, and who have already ruled against him?

Did he appoint lefties?

23 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

personally attack judges simply for ruling against their preferred policies, they undermine the legitimacy of an independent judiciary. These attacks aren’t merely words – they’re increasingly accompanied by concrete executive and legislative efforts to strip courts of jurisdiction, pack benches with ideological allies, or even impeach judges for their legal reasoning.

This erosion of judicial independence strikes at the heart of constitutional system of checks and balances. Without courts empowered to review and potentially invalidate unconstitutional actions, the executive and legislative branches face few constraints on their power.

This is the start of the downfall of America !

Eroding the power and independence of the judicial system is indeed very dangerous to America's democracy. The abuse of executive orders have gotten out of hand. And threatening judges smacks of a dictatorship. I never thought I would wish for the GOP to lose control of Congress and the White House.

4d chess

no worry

6 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

What's your take on this?

It looks like your favorite tactic when your extreme bias becomes painfully obvious.

Edited May 28May 28 by gamb00ler

Troll post breaking trying to bypass forum filters removed.

@SunnyinBangrak the forum has a set of rules and when posts break them the posts are removed. Discuss the topic and not forum rules and moderation.

1 hour ago, MikeandDow said:

When political leaders personally attack judges simply for ruling against their preferred policies, they undermine the legitimacy of an independent judiciary. These attacks aren’t merely words – they’re increasingly accompanied by concrete executive and legislative efforts to strip courts of jurisdiction, pack benches with ideological allies, or even impeach judges for their legal reasoning.

Yea, I'm getting tired of the Democrats attacking SCOUTS.

1 hour ago, Hawaiian said:

Eroding the power and independence of the judicial system is indeed very dangerous to America's democracy.

True

Obama Criticizes Supreme Court in State of the Union Address, Justice Alito Shakes His Head

https://youtu.be/deGg41IiWwU?si=5EYxh9hm_XrJPkUB

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries recently labeled the U.S. Supreme Court "illegitimate" and "corrupt," accusing its conservative majority of acting on behalf of Donald Trump to disenfranchise minority voters and subvert democracy

https://jeffries.house.gov/2026/04/29/leader-jeffries-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-eviscerating-the-voting-rights-act/

Senator Warren also announced that she will cosponsor the Judiciary Act of 2021, which would add four seats to the Supreme Court to restore balance, integrity, and independence to the extremist Court that has been hijacked, politicized, and delegitimized by Republicans. 

https://www.warren.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/in-op-ed-senator-warren-calls-for-supreme-court-expansion-to-protect-democracy-and-restore-independent-judiciary

1. Senator Chuck Schumer: Attracted national attention in 2022 when he spoke on the steps of the Supreme Court, directly warning Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch that they would "release the whirlwind" and "pay the price" if they ruled against abortion rights.

2. Representatives Ted Lieu and Ro Khanna: Known for vocal rebukes of the Court's makeup and ethics. Lieu has called Chief Justice John Roberts a "political actor" leading an ultra-partisan Court, while Khanna has referred to the institution as "morally bankrupt".

3. Senator Dick Durbin: As Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Durbin has regularly attacked the Court's ethics standards, specifically condemning Chief Justice John Roberts over undisclosed trips and gifts involving conservative donors. [1, 2, 3]

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/486424-how-the-media-ignores-pattern-of-democratic-attacks-on-the-courts/

I could go on.

@MikeandDow ^^^^^

Edited May 28May 28 by TedG

1 hour ago, Hawaiian said:

And threatening judges smacks of a dictatorship. I never thought I would wish for the GOP to lose control of Congress and the White House.

So the dems can pack the courts to install judges who will rubber stamp their agenda?