Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump Approval Rating Falls to Lowest Point of Second Term, Poll Shows

Featured Replies

15 hours ago, still kicking said:

You will still be reading his answers when he answers someone.

Nope. I'm just gonna scroll over it! My time is too precious to me...

  • Replies 182
  • Views 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

All American billionaires are dumb as a box of rocks, if they were smart, they'd be schoolteachers

Smart guys move to Pattaya and Isaan and support Biden.

55 minutes ago, pacovl46 said:

Nope. I'm just gonna scroll over it! My time is too precious to me...

Joined 2008. Don't think so.

2 hours ago, newnative said:

That 73% who think the economy is tanking is horrendous--for Trump and the Republicans. Let's not forget James Carville's famous, and correct, political comment: "It's the economy, stupid." Indeed, it is. Voters vote with their pocketbooks.

The economy was considered bad during Bush 1's re-election try--and he lost. Ditto for Carter--who also was denied a second term. Biden's economy, after inheriting Trump's horrible first term mess, was actually starting to improve by 2024, but the voters thought otherwise, mainly due to inflation still being high, resulting in a win for the Republicans. So much for 'opinions are bs.'

Fortune magazine has an April article entitled, "Trump's economy officially passes Biden's for worst consumer sentiment in recorded history". Yikes. Another record 'worst' for Trump.

High inflation is a killer. Not so unemployment. Obama had high unemployment in 12 and won. But yeah inflation killed Biden chances then that debate. Inflation fell in 24 but it was too late. If Trump inflation is high in 27 it will hurt the next guy. If low the Dems will lose again.

Easy just don't feed him, even if you reply with 1 word he will use it as an excuse to respond to you. Thats his MO. Got no interest participating in threads he just likes to wind up members so don't feed him the more, if you bite the stronger he gets.

1 minute ago, BarraMarra said:

Easy just don't feed him, even if you reply with 1 word he will use it as an excuse to respond to you. Thats his MO. Got no interest participating in threads he just likes to wind up members so don't feed him the more, if you bite the stronger he gets.

Are you back to discussing members rather than discussing the topic again? You do that a lot!

Nobody cares anymore about you or your propaganda go away your not on my ignore list your just boring so i don't respond to you anymore.

Not just according to a single poll, but according to polling averages, Trump is at the lowest point of his second term.

11 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Not just according to a single poll, but according to polling averages, Trump is at the lowest point of his second term.

Well, he still has a long way to go to beat Truman.

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Well, he still has a long way to go to beat Truman.

Well, those little ratings for Truman came during the second half of his term. I'm still has plenty of time to claim the number one spot.

Same happened with Biden and those before. Be it one or the other one, they just are all the same corrupt bunch of corrupt individuals who use their position in the Oval Office to make as much of bucks as possible, for themselves or mainly their cronies around.

2 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Well, those little ratings for Truman came during the second half of his term. I'm still has plenty of time to claim the number one spot.

I was just pointing it out because a number of leftists have been falsely claiming he has the lowest rating of any president in history, but we know how leftists

In all fairness to the lying leftists, all the charts the leftist media produce only go back as far as Ike. Funny that huh?

9 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I was just pointing it out because a number of leftists have been falsely claiming he has the lowest rating of any president in history, but we know how leftists

In all fairness to the lying leftists, all the charts the leftist media produce only go back as far as Ike. Funny that huh?

What we do know is that some people repeatedly rmake ridiculous blanket generalizations.

On 4/21/2026 at 6:52 AM, pacovl46 said:

Tell me you don't know what you're talking about without telling me! America is an IMPORT economy. And as soon as the petro-dollar becomes history your economy will collapse because you won't be able to pay the interest rates on your 40 trillion dollar debt anymore. The only thing keeping it alive so far is the fact that the world buys oil in dollars. As soon as that changes you're in deep sh.t!

First, the U.S. is not simply an “import economy.” It runs a trade deficit in goods, but it’s also one of the largest exporters in the world and dominates services, finance, and high-value industries.

Second, the “petrodollar = whole economy” idea is overstated. Oil being priced in dollars helps reinforce global dollar use, but the dollar’s role comes much more from:

  • the size of the U.S. economy

  • deep, liquid Treasury markets

  • relative political and legal stability

60% of global reserves are still in dollars—not just because of oil.

Third, the debt point: the U.S. debt is large (between $34–36T publicly held depending on measure, not a flat $40T owed at market rates), but it’s issued in its own currency. The U.S. doesn’t face the same “can’t pay interest” constraint as countries borrowing in foreign currencies. Rising rates matter, but they don’t trigger instant collapse scenarios.

Finally, even if oil were priced in multiple currencies tomorrow, that would be a gradual shift, not a sudden “lights out” event.

Global systems don’t flip overnight—especially ones as entrenched as dollar-denominated finance.

So yeah—there are legitimate concerns about deficits and long-term fiscal policy. But “petrodollar disappears = U.S. economy collapses instantly” is more dramatic than economic reality.

44 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I was just pointing it out because a number of leftists have been falsely claiming he has the lowest rating of any president in history, but we know how leftists

In all fairness to the lying leftists, all the charts the leftist media produce only go back as far as Ike. Funny that huh?

Whew!!! That makes it soooo much better!!! Meanwhile, Trump, in his second term, does have the lowest approval rating for the first 100 days of any presidency. I expect he'll be wanting some sort of medal to mark the achievement. If anyone is wondering who was the previous record holder for that dubious honor, well, that was Trump, too, with the first 100 days of his first term. His first term, of course, went on to become the worst presidency in US history--which will also most certainly be surpassed by his current one, if the US survives it.

1 minute ago, newnative said:

Whew!!! That makes it soooo much better!!! Meanwhile, Trump, in his second term, does have the lowest approval rating for the first 100 days of any presidency. I expect he'll be wanting some sort of medal to mark the achievement. If anyone is wondering who was the previous record holder for that dubious honor, well, that was Trump, too, with the first 100 days of his first term. His first term, of course, went on to become the worst presidency in US history--which will also most certainly be surpassed by his current one, if the US survives it.

Yeah, Trump's ratings are in the in the tank, but I do not know anyone that voted for Trump that wishes they voted for Harris.

Do you think Iran should be allowed to develop their nuclear and ballistic missile programs?

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, Trump's ratings are in the in the tank, but I do not know anyone that voted for Trump that wishes they voted for Harris.

Do you think Iran should be allowed to develop their nuclear and ballistic missile programs?

That's a moot question and shame on you for even asking it. Dear Leader Trump, and I quote, "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program. OBLITERATED! End of story.

12 minutes ago, newnative said:

That's a moot question and shame on you for even asking it. Dear Leader Trump, and I quote, "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program. OBLITERATED! End of story.

You call it a "moot question" because you are too weak to answer it honestly.

But I'll rephrase: Do you think Iran should be allowed to continue developing their intercontinental ballistic missile program?

Are you able to answer that?

9 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

You call it a "moot question" because you are too weak to answer it honestly.

But I'll rephrase: Do you think Iran should be allowed to continue developing their intercontinental ballistic missile program?

Are you able to answer that?

To answer your question, no, but not the way Trump went about preventing it. There was no immediate threat to the US--especially since Iran's nuclear program was supposedly already destroyed, according to Trump. With no immediate threat, negotiations should have continued, with war only as a last resort, and with the active agreement, planning, and participation of more than just the US and Israel.

20 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Are you back to discussing members rather than discussing the topic again? You do that a lot!

Well Trump economics is working so they have to attack the poster.

1 hour ago, newnative said:

To answer your question, no, but not the way Trump went about preventing it. There was no immediate threat to the US--especially since Iran's nuclear program was supposedly already destroyed, according to Trump. With no immediate threat, negotiations should have continued, with war only as a last resort, and with the active agreement, planning, and participation of more than just the US and Israel.

The US has been negotiating with Iran for 47 years. Most recently, for four years during the Biden Administration. What came of that?

Iran's nuclear program was set back a few years, but Iran's intercontinental ballistic missile and drone programs, were not touched, and were apparently much more advanced than was previously thought.

Once you've decided to take an enemy to task, why give them time to prepare?

25 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The US has been negotiating with Iran for 47 years. Most recently, for four years during the Biden Administration. What came of that?

Really? For 47 years? You got some actual evidence to support that claim?

26 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Iran's nuclear program was set back a few years, but Iran's intercontinental ballistic missile and drone programs, were not touched, and were apparently much more advanced than was previously thought.

Once you've decided to take an enemy to task, why give them time to prepare?

And once you've got them on the ropes, the last thing you would want to do is pause the fight and give them time to recover.

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

The US has been negotiating with Iran for 47 years. Most recently, for four years during the Biden Administration. What came of that?

Iran's nuclear program was set back a few years, but Iran's intercontinental ballistic missile and drone programs, were not touched, and were apparently much more advanced than was previously thought.

Once you've decided to take an enemy to task, why give them time to prepare?

Anything at all that distracts from Trump pedophile's history with Epstein he considers a blessing.

19 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, Trump's ratings are in the in the tank, but I do not know anyone that voted for Trump that wishes they voted for Harris.

Do you think Iran should be allowed to develop their nuclear and ballistic missile programs?

"I do not know anyone that voted for Trump that wishes they voted for Harris." Then you don't know Jack, do you.

Uh oh, another leftist with a ten-year-old account, 400 posts, and 90% of them in the last week

6 minutes ago, Geoff914 said:

Longer than than. Interference in Iran goes back to 1953 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

Yellowtail's comment was about negotiations. Not about American interference. I still say that the worst thing America did - a genuinely indisputable war crime - was to support Saddam Hussein's war against Iran even after he started to use poison gas. In fact, the administration allowed Iraq to keep on buying those precursors from the US even though they knew what they were being used for.

28 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Saddam Hussein's war against Iran even after he started to use poison gas.

And Iran did not respond in kind because as with nuclear weapons they believe that weapons of

'mass destruction' are against their religious belief.

24 minutes ago, johng said:

And Iran did not respond in kind because as with nuclear weapons they believe that weapons of

'mass destruction' are against their religious belief.

Yet their religion is fine with killing thousands of protesters and every infidel on the planet that refuses to convert, got it,

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.