7 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

You still have not substantiated your claim that the USA dumped nuclear waste in the Mariana Trench. You are all over the place in your desperate attempt to divert. Now you are off on a tangent about insults. I see the person's the comment as justified and an accurate description of your attempt to present inaccurate and misleading information.

Whatever gets you through the night cupcake

8 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

You never miss an opportunity to push your recycled bankrupt 1960's political sloganeering and agenda. Like your politics, it has no value. You have made multiple claims. It is your obligatiion to support the allegations. You have not provided anything to support your position other than perhaps something you scraped off one of your leftist websites or wikipedia.

Fact: The USN USS Thresher documents are available through the Archives Branch, Naval History and Heritage Command, Washington, D.C.

Fact: The USN is subject to Congressional oversight. The Thresher radiation exposure reviews are in the Congressional record.

Fact: The US Department of Energy released multiple reports over the years as did the USN that summarized the radiation monitoring. Visit page 3 of the attached reference to see an example of the monitoring over the years. https://www.nuclearinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Subnet.com_USS_Thresher_15_August_2000.pdf

Have you even bothered to read the report from 2020?

https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2020/07/f77/NT-20-1.pdf

There are no available Russian reports or disclosures on the radiation hazard and potential leaks from the Russian torpedos. The Russians have refused to pay for the monitoring or to disclose the information that they have on their nuclear submarines.

A submarine nuclear reactor is built to withstand the environment in which it operates. Although it can degrade over time, the process is significantly longer than that associated with items not built for purpose.

A nuclear torpedo is not intended for long term use, nor exposed to the operating conditions of a nuclear reactor. It is an item that is meant to explode. It defies common sense that you would consider a nuclear reactor built for long term use under harsh conditions as similar to a torpedo with a nuclear explosive.

Thanks for the govt references. You're right: I was not aware of them. I was not thinking of the reactor but the Thresher's weaponry.

AI: The USS Thresher carried a mix of advanced anti-submarine weapons, including the SUBROC nuclear-armed anti-submarine missile, Mark 37 torpedoes, and deep-water mines. Its arsenal could total up to 22 weapons, all housed in four torpedo tubes amidships.

Are you saying that salt water will not corrode everything on that U-boat?!?

AI: The pressure hull of the USS Thresher (SSN-593) was built using HY-80 steel. HY-80 is a high-yield, high-strength alloy designed to withstand the crushing water pressure at extreme depths.

Every owned a car? Driven salted roads in winter?

Yeah, being anti-nuke is so 60s, right. If you're tired, go back to sleep.

On 7/14/2026 at 10:17 PM, Priorexpat said:

consumed by deep-sea crustaceans."

That are now slowly mutating, growing in size and will arise to claim the planet

On 7/18/2026 at 10:03 AM, unblocktheplanet said:

AI: The pressure hull of the USS Thresher (SSN-593) was built using HY-80 steel. HY-80 is a high-yield, high-strength alloy designed to withstand the crushing water pressure at extreme depths.

the Titan. Operated by the American company OceanGate would disagree with that

3 hours ago, wombat said:

On 7/18/2026 at 10:03 AM, unblocktheplanet said:

AI: The pressure hull of the USS Thresher (SSN-593) was built using HY-80 steel. HY-80 is a high-yield, high-strength alloy designed to withstand the crushing water pressure at extreme depths.

the Titan. Operated by the American company OceanGate would disagree with that

Was the Titan (max 4,000 metres) built of HY-80 steel? That's how deep the Titanic is but Titan only made it to 3,800. What a spectacular way to go!

On 7/18/2026 at 10:03 AM, unblocktheplanet said:

Thanks for the govt references. You're right: I was not aware of them. I was not thinking of the reactor but the Thresher's weaponry.

AI: The USS Thresher carried a mix of advanced anti-submarine weapons, including the SUBROC nuclear-armed anti-submarine missile, Mark 37 torpedoes, and deep-water mines. Its arsenal could total up to 22 weapons, all housed in four torpedo tubes amidships.

Are you saying that salt water will not corrode everything on that U-boat?!?

AI: The pressure hull of the USS Thresher (SSN-593) was built using HY-80 steel. HY-80 is a high-yield, high-strength alloy designed to withstand the crushing water pressure at extreme depths.

Navy

Every owned a car? Driven salted roads in winter?

Yeah, being anti-nuke is so 60s, right. If you're tired, go back to sleep.