1 hour ago, HolmesEquivelant said:

A unbiased CONVICTION of child rape would have a negative effect on my support of him. Not the kangaroo court we all witnessed in the E Carroll case.

But there is no credible evidence. Photoshopped photos don’t count.

Until then, he’s doing exactly what I and the majority of Americans hired him to do.

Make America Great Again!!!

Did that answer your question?

Yes, you’ve answered the hypothetical: you say an unbiased conviction for child rape would negatively affect your support.

But that raises the question of what you would actually accept as an unbiased conviction.
You've already dismissed Trump's 34 felony convictions and the Carroll verdict as kangaroo courts, citing bias and vindictive prosecution without evidence, despite repeatedly demanding evidence from others throughout this topic.

You seem to think you are the sole arbiter of guilt, deciding whether a court is legitimate simply because you disagree with its ruling. But sorry, that's not how it works in a democracy.

Nevertheless, what evidence would you actually accept as proof that a court proceeding was unbiased?

And if I could provide you with credible evidence of child rape, would you accept it?

Right. The majority of Americans didn't hire him for losing an endless war, high gas prices, record inflation, and destroying the East Wing.

Edited August 10Aug 10 by LosLobo

37 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Yes, you’ve answered the hypothetical: you say an unbiased conviction for child rape would negatively affect your support.

But that raises the question of what you would actually accept as an unbiased conviction.
You've already dismissed Trump's 34 felony convictions and the Carroll verdict as kangaroo courts, citing bias and vindictive prosecution without evidence, despite repeatedly demanding evidence from others throughout this topic.

Discover more

expat

Niche forum hosting

Thai language courses

World news updates

World news podcast

Thailand travel guides

You seem to think you are the sole arbiter of guilt, deciding whether a court is legitimate simply because you disagree with its ruling. But sorry, that's not how it works in a democracy.

Nevertheless, what evidence would you actually accept as proof that a court proceeding was unbiased?

And if I could provide you with credible evidence of child rape, would you accept it?

Right. The majority of Americans didn't hire him for losing an endless war, high gas prices, record inflation, and destroying the East Wing.

Lots to cover but I’ll mention the most important.

No Trump hating judge and jury from a Trump hating jurisdiction. Within the statute of limitations, not orchestrated just for Trump.

DNA from semen from the child’s body or underwear that matches Trump’s.

Complete investigation by the FBI and local LE with a proper indictment.

When can you provide the evidence I asked for?

52 minutes ago, HolmesEquivelant said:

Lots to cover but I’ll mention the most important.

No Trump hating judge and jury from a Trump hating jurisdiction. Within the statute of limitations, not orchestrated just for Trump.

DNA from semen from the child’s body or underwear that matches Trump’s.

Complete investigation by the FBI and local LE with a proper indictment.

When can you provide the evidence I asked for?

You seem to have missed the most important part. I repeat it again for you.

You've already dismissed Trump's 34 felony convictions and the Carroll verdict as 'kangaroo courts,' citing bias and vindictive prosecution without evidence.

So before demanding evidence from me, when can you provide the credible evidence supporting those claims?

Otherwise, people are left to assume you're simply making it up.

6 hours ago, LosLobo said:

You seem to have missed the most important part. I repeat it again for you.

You've already dismissed Trump's 34 felony convictions and the Carroll verdict as 'kangaroo courts,' citing bias and vindictive prosecution without evidence.

So before demanding evidence from me, when can you provide the credible evidence supporting those claims?

Otherwise, people are left to assume you're simply making it up.

“But that raises the question of what you would actually accept as an unbiased conviction.”

just answered your question. Whether or not you believe me is up to you.

The fact is you don’t have the evidence I asked for.

The kangaroo court felony counts/Carroll case are irrelevant to your question.

However, 77 million Americans agreed with me and now he is POTUS.

8 hours ago, LosLobo said:

And if I could provide you with credible evidence of child rape, would you accept it?

I challenge you to provide credible evidence substantiating claims of child rape.

2 minutes ago, temuFarang said:

I challenge you to provide credible evidence substantiating claims of child rape.

There are at least two claims of Trump kiddie fiddling. One is in the unreleased portions of the Epstein Files, regarding a woman interviewed 4 times by the FBI who claimed Trump tried to make her give him a shakuhatchi (Japanese term inserted for politeness). Another court filing involves allegations of a violent rape by Trump of a girl about age 11.

A supposed independent DoJ, which has spent 9 months ignoring a court order to release the Epstein Files, and which spends its time obeying Trump's demands to go after critics or supposed "vandals" is unlikely to pursue any allegation of pedophilia against Trump, just as it refuses to investigate his business dealings, meme coin scam, insider trading, selling pre-release info on Tweets he plans to post, the stolen documents case, etc.

Trump even sued himself and settled with himself out of court (the IRS leak), though that $1.776 billion settlement is being held up, and theoretically was dropped by Blanche in return for the votes to confirm by Cornyn and Tillis.

Just now, Wingate said:

There are at least two claims of Trump kiddie fiddling. One is in the unreleased portions of the Epstein Files, regarding a woman interviewed 4 times by the FBI who claimed Trump tried to make her give him a shakuhatchi (Japanese term inserted for politeness). Another court filing involves allegations of a violent rape by Trump of a girl about age 11.

A supposed independent DoJ, which has spent 9 months ignoring a court order to release the Epstein Files, and which spends its time obeying Trump's demands to go after critics or supposed "vandals" is unlikely to pursue any allegation of pedophilia against Trump, just as it refuses to investigate his business dealings, meme coin scam, insider trading, selling pre-release info on Tweets he plans to post, the stolen documents case, etc.

Trump even sued himself and settled with himself out of court (the IRS leak), though that $1.776 billion settlement is being held up, and theoretically was dropped by Blanche in return for the votes to confirm by Cornyn and Tillis.

What were the findings of the FBI investigation? Were any criminal charges brought forth? It's time for your side to step up and either provide evidence or acknowledge it never happen.

24 minutes ago, HolmesEquivelant said:

“But that raises the question of what you would actually accept as an unbiased conviction.”

just answered your question. Whether or not you believe me is up to you.

The fact is you don’t have the evidence I asked for.

The kangaroo court felony counts/Carroll case are irrelevant to your question.

However, 77 million Americans agreed with me and now he is POTUS.

Your inability to support your claims with evidence proves my point: 'you're simply making it up'.

Enjoy your evening.

5 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Your inability to support your claims with evidence proves my point: 'you're simply making it up'.

Enjoy your evening.

Now you’re deflecting from your original question to me. Posted in my previous post.

Just man up and say you have no evidence to indict Trump on child rape charges.

You, not anyone else has any evidence.