5 hours ago, FinChin67 said:

Was not surprised that most of the comments are just bitter personal attacks.

Calling her a future housemaid after she was White House Press Secretary is pure cope. The same people here who made excuses for Psaki and JPK every day are suddenly Aseannow experts on credibility.

The sexual insults are just pathetic but that's the lefts specialty. When your argument is “blisters on her knees” and “arse-like lips,” you’ve already lost. That’s just bitterness (or stupidity) which is pathetic.

If all you’ve got is she’s ugly / she’s a liar / she’s going to hell you have nothing real to say.

She surely had different credentials and character if you compare to for example KJP who was "the first Black and openly gay press secretary" famous for scripted, often Hatch Act / “I’ve got nothing for you".

Here’s a fact.

She’s a liar.

Deal with that.

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Here’s a fact.

She’s a liar.

Deal with that.

In your anti-trump world sure but I don't need to deal with anything. She was very competent and kept you commies in check.

That's the best you can do?

24 minutes ago, FinChin67 said:

In your anti-trump world sure but I don't need to deal with anything. She was very competent and kept you commies in check.

That's the best you can do?

I don’t dispute she’s a competent liar, well practiced is how I would put it.

‘Commies’, is that the best you can do?

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I don’t dispute she’s a competent liar, well practiced is how I would put it.

‘Commies’, is that the best you can do?

You conceded the competence. The rest is you losing the argument and reaching for “liar.”

Little about your commie (stings right?) comrades: a teleprompter with pearls and a press secretary who made the empty podium the product. Psaki read the card and called it strategy and she is still lying for the vegetable who can’t finish a sentence and does not know where he is at. She did not stop the lie just took it private.

KJP hid from the room.

Low value posts and the replies have been removed:

13. Low-Value Posts - Posts that add no written contribution are not allowed.

This includes emoji-only replies, very short comments, memes, GIFs, screenshots, or embedded social media posts without explanation or opinion.

59 minutes ago, FinChin67 said:

You conceded the competence. The rest is you losing the argument and reaching for “liar.”

Little about your commie (stings right?) comrades: a teleprompter with pearls and a press secretary who made the empty podium the product. Psaki read the card and called it strategy and she is still lying for the vegetable who can’t finish a sentence and does not know where he is at. She did not stop the lie just took it private.

KJP hid from the room.

I don’t need to reach for liar, she is a liar.

Your whataboutary is noted.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I don’t need to reach for liar, she is a liar.

Your whataboutary is noted.

You still have not produced a lie.

You produced a label, twice, then a third time, then hid behind “whataboutary” when the other two press secretaries were named. That is not a fact -> that is a loop.

You don’t need to reach for liar. You need an example. Until you post one, you are the bloke repeating a word and hoping it hardens into evidence.

Your commie (still stings?) side doesn’t work from the record. It works from the reflex. You’re done.

Clock out.

23 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

Nor are you. Whetheror not she is beautiful has no relevance to her performance as a press secretary. It is juvenile to judge her based upon her appearance. She was a mediocre press secretary, and her common response to a question was to use recycled throw away lines. There was always a rehearsed generic statement.

You reduce everything to the most infantile and idiotic level. The problem I have with that is that it disparages and insults the people who actually set the standard and who are recognized for their integrity and skills. You elevate a bland mediocre press secretary for your own political reasons. Have a look at the Eisenhower administration's press secretary, James C. Hagerty. He held the position for 8 years and was deeply respected and set the high bar for the position. Only two other people came close, and they both propped up troubled administrations; Pierre Salinger (Nixon) and Jody Powell (Carter). All three had integrity and trustworthiness. You cannot compare your Ms. Leavitt to these three.

The Atlantic offers a scathing assessment of Ms. Leavitt's performance, and it is not one that I can not disagree with.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/08/karoline-leavitt-press-secretary-lies/688460/

You support promoting people based on their skin colour so be quiet, son.

15 hours ago, FinChin67 said:

They do not even know what a woman is.

The only "woman" they'd support promoting is the kind with meat and 2 veg.

4 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

The only "woman" they'd support promoting is the kind with meat and 2 veg.

Agree. That's their "woman".

Seems this had been over looked

8 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Seems this had been over looked

Yahoo News

Fact Check: Epstein Files Do NOT Reveal Documents Showing...

Do new documents from the Department of Justice Epstein files reveal that Erika Kirk used to work for Jeffrey Epstein? No, that's not true: A search of the publicly available DOJ file of Epstein inves

Lovely lady but I always thought her

pants were on fire !

On 8/31/2026 at 8:51 AM, JonnyF said:

Pretty disrespectful way to objectify a woman like that,

Wow! Look! @JonnyF's got pearls!

12 hours ago, FinChin67 said:

You still have not produced a lie.

You produced a label, twice, then a third time, then hid behind “whataboutary” when the other two press secretaries were named. That is not a fact -> that is a loop.

You don’t need to reach for liar. You need an example. Until you post one, you are the bloke repeating a word and hoping it hardens into evidence.

Your commie (still stings?) side doesn’t work from the record. It works from the reflex. You’re done.

Clock out.

Tariffs are "tax cuts for Americans".

The US spent $50m on condoms for Gaza.

There are two whoppers for a start.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/aug/14/karoline-leavitt-legacy-of-lies-trump-aide

https://politifact.com/factchecks/list/?speaker=karoline-leavitt

1 hour ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Seems this had been over looked

Can you put a link to this claim instead of stupid MEME? Or you love to lie like Psaki and KPJ? You really like to go low when bringing up Erika Kirk.

https://www.snopes.com/collections/erika-kirk-rumors/

13 rumors about Erika Kirk that we've investigated

Following the assassination of her husband, Erika Kirk became the subject of numerous false and unfounded claims.

20 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Tariffs are "tax cuts for Americans".

The US spent $50m on condoms for Gaza.

There are two whoppers for a start.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/aug/14/karoline-leavitt-legacy-of-lies-trump-aide

https://politifact.com/factchecks/list/?speaker=karoline-leavitt

Omg the guardian and politi"fact".... you really like to pull me into your commie world. No Thanks, I do not need safe space or woke shiat and I can handle being offended. Like you not knowing what a woman is.

What I get from your concerns is that you most LOVE DOGE.

Good to keep Epstein files in the news though , right?

10 hours ago, JonnyF said:

The only "woman" they'd support promoting is the kind with meat and 2 veg.

What is it about right-wingers that compelled them to be fixated on other people’s genitals?

1 hour ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Good to keep Epstein files in the news though , right?

Much better to get them out in the public, as the law demands.

In the meantime, yes keep them in the news.

14 hours ago, FinChin67 said:

You still have not produced a lie.

You produced a label, twice, then a third time, then hid behind “whataboutary” when the other two press secretaries were named. That is not a fact -> that is a loop.

You don’t need to reach for liar. You need an example. Until you post one, you are the bloke repeating a word and hoping it hardens into evidence.

Your commie (still stings?) side doesn’t work from the record. It works from the reflex. You’re done.

Clock out.

Forgive me, I thought you knew who Leavitt is and were aware of her lies.

Here’s some examples of her lies with the truth attached to each:

https://politifact.com/article/2026/aug/13/karoline-leavitt-white-house-press-secretary/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Edited 7 hours ago7 hr by Chomper Higgot

1 hour ago, FinChin67 said:

Omg the guardian and politi"fact".... you really like to pull me into your commie world. No Thanks, I do not need safe space or woke shiat and I can handle being offended. Like you not knowing what a woman is.

What I get from your concerns is that you most LOVE DOGE.

Rightwinger sticks his head in the sand unaware that bending over to do so exposes where it is he does what passes for his thinking.

4 hours ago, FinChin67 said:

Omg the guardian and politi"fact".... you really like to pull me into your commie world. No Thanks, I do not need safe space or woke shiat and I can handle being offended. Like you not knowing what a woman is.

What I get from your concerns is that you most LOVE DOGE.

I don't know what your DOGE comment even means but it sounds very childish.

I gave you two lies. You ignored them. Says it all.

Tariffs are "tax cuts for Americans".

The US spent $50m on condoms for Gaza.

Both are lies. I gave you links to when she said them but you ignore them. You can't admit you are wrong because your blind faith to your cult leader doesn't allow it.