What you said after the first time you were corrected was: "It's illegal for a foreigner to open a Thai company, using nominees, for the sole purpose of owning land in Thailand." Again, that is incorrect. My response was: "I could open a manufacturing business producing goods I ship to customers in the US, for the sole purpose of legally owning land in Thailand, and I could own it all 100%" I can open a company for the sole purpose of buying land, but to do that legally I would have to use a legitimate business to facilitate my sole purpose. Say I start a business for the sole purpose of earning money. If the business sells tacos, that does not change the sole purpose of the business. The sole purpose of the business is to make money, not to sell tacos. That you do not understand that is amusing. That you are cut-and-pasting definitions to "prove" your point is hilarious.
Create an account or sign in to comment