iraq

afghanistan

chechnya

south africa

jamaica

sudan

THAILAND

columbia

haiti

eritrea

dr congo

liberia

pakistan

burundi

nigeria

zimbabwe

india

mexico

palestine/isreal

lebanon

according to the Daily Telegraph anyway. Personally i'd prefer to take my chances in Bangkok than the apparantly safe Mogodishu. (yes yes - i know it says 'of the world')

Edited November 30, 200817 yr by mittheimp

What what a load of sh!t

I read what the Telegraph had to say and anyone with half a brain would agree

though I'm sure the US, Russia and the UK could equally have been amongst this top 20.

"Major political demonstrations and a temporary state of emergency have affected both of Bangkok’s airports. The area around Government House and nearby Ratchadamnoen “Nok” Road, including the area around Metropolitan Police headquarters and Parliament should be avoided. Fighting also broke out last month on the Cambodian border at Preah Vihear and tensions remain high. Civil unrest and frequent attacks continue in the southern provinces of Pattani, Yala, Narathiwat and Songkhla – the Foreign Office advises against all but essential travel to these areas."

Discussed elsewhere... lots.

Can't think of any other place I feel safer walking around alone at night, aside from Singapore.

What what a load of sh!t

Ditto.

They haven't got a clue.

I would include Hartlepool (where I originate), if you`re a Sunderland (football) supporter....

even indonesia would be more dangerous then thailand....