chevykanteve Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Today's BKK Post states that: Minister: Govt not favouring PAD ..... Prime Minister's Office Minister Satit Wongnongtaey denied having pressured the Secretariat of the Prime Minister to withdraw a lawsuit against People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD) leaders for encroaching the Government House. He insisted that the government does not favour the PAD, but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Yup, they are just very, very forgiving. Want to move on....mai pen lai....etc. etc. But definitely not showing favoritism! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chevykanteve Posted March 3, 2009 Author Share Posted March 3, 2009 Yup, they are just very, very forgiving. Want to move on....mai pen lai....etc. etc. But definitely not showing favoritism! Bravo! I see that you too understand the essence --indeed, the quintessence-- of the reality of the situation. I deem thee enlightened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbk Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 OK, off topic posts, discussion of moderation etc etc etc have been deleted. chevykanteve, please add a link to source your article and please post your opinions in a separate post from the news article, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tw25rw Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 PAD are a potential troublemaking thorn in the side for any govt, even one supposedly on the same side. If they're smart, they'll be discretely pressuring them to disband and prosecuting/discrediting the ringleaders without appearing to be working against them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsetBkk Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Today's BKK Post states that:Minister: Govt not favouring PAD ..... Prime Minister's Office Minister Satit Wongnongtaey denied having pressured the Secretariat of the Prime Minister to withdraw a lawsuit against People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD) leaders for encroaching the Government House. He insisted that the government does not favour the PAD, but... Link: http://www.bangkokpost.com/breakingnews/13...t-favouring-pad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johna Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Well I guess next move to prove there is no favoritism, the government will grant a general amnesty to all politicians, and political party's. Back to the barricades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chevykanteve Posted March 8, 2009 Author Share Posted March 8, 2009 Well I guess next move to prove there is no favoritism, the government will grant a general amnesty to all politicians, and political party's.Back to the barricades. So true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chevykanteve Posted March 8, 2009 Author Share Posted March 8, 2009 PAD are a potential troublemaking thorn in the side for any govt, even one supposedly on the same side.If they're smart, they'll be discretely pressuring them to disband and prosecuting/discrediting the ringleaders without appearing to be working against them. Why pressure them in a discrete manner? Maybe I'm just dumb, but.... if... for example.... a group of people seized and effectively stopped the operations of Heathrow, SFO or --God forbid --- a major airport in mainland China... would not the authorities in those respective countries take .... uhhhh.... definitive action??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now