Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Personally, I don't quite get this story. The inference is that mediation is possible for criminal rather than only for civil cases (other than the circumstances quoted such as drugs, human trafficking etc). What kind of b******t is that? A crime is a crime, and should be penalised accordingly. Criminal guilt should not be negotiable. Mediation is negotiation, and that should have no place in a criminal judicial system. As for 'recommending' where her colleagues play their golf for fear of them appearing to be biased, if the law officers were not to use any facility or service in Phuket that was involved in some form of dispute, they wouldn't be leaving their homes very often!

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

New Phuket Chief Justice urges more mediation

Phuket Provincial Court Chief Justice Varangkana Sujaritkul

PHUKET CITY: The new Chief Justice of Phuket Provincial Court held a press conference yesterday to promote greater use of the court mediation system to settle legal disputes, the backlog of which is overwhelming the provincial court system and leading to long delays between trial dates.

Phuket Provincial Court Chief Justice Varangkana Sujaritkul said she will promote the use of the mediation system to reduce the caseload currently burdening the court’s 18 judges.

Last year 9,000 cases were filed with Phuket Provincial Court, about 6,000 criminal cases and 3,000 civil suits. Some 20% of the total involved foreigners, she said.

To increase public awareness of the mediation system and promote its use, Chief Justice Varangkana will lead a seminar on the topic at the Royal Phuket City Hotel on June 9. Representatives from various clubs and associations have been invited to attend.

She stressed that the mediation system can be used to settle all legal disputes, with the exception of those involving national security issues like narcotics, money laundering and human trafficking.

In a related development, Chief Justice Varangkana urged her colleagues who enjoy playing golf not to do so at the Blue Canyon Country Club, which has for five years been at the center of a bitter ownership dispute.

Phuket Provincial Court is still investigating evidence in the case between Singaporean businessman Sia Leng Yuen and former partner Rawat Chindapol and has yet to specify when a ruling will be made, she said.

“It is not good that the judges are playing golf at the course, as they may be seen as taking sides with one party in the dispute,” she said.

Unfortunately, neither side in the Blue Canyon dispute is interested in resolving the case through mediation, she said.

Chief Justice Varangkana has been in her current position since April this year.

“I will fulfill my duties to the best of my abilities to serve all the people of Phuket, just as my uncles did before me,” she said.

Chief Justice Varangkana represents the third generation of a well-known family of adjudicators, many with experience in Phuket.

Her uncle Piyachart Sujarikul served as Phuket Chief Justice from 1971 to 1973.

Another uncle on her father’s side, Pridi Sujaritkul, held the same post from 1980 until 1982, when he was shot and killed. The case, which was never solved, was thought to involve a land dispute.

A Bangkok native, Chief Justice Varangkana's transfer to Phuket followed a one-year assignment in Ubon Ratchathani where she also served as Chief Justice.

– Kamol Pirat

Print this story | Send it to a friend Phuket, Thailand

Send Letter to Gazette Editor 16:22 local time

Facebook MySpace Twitter Delicious Digg

(Local time is GMT+7)

Posted (edited)

you are misunderstanding potential criminal activity associated with a dispute between legal persons and criminal charges filed by the police

(also of course even when it involves the police 'negotiation' is not entirely discarded :))

regardless of mediation there are so many rich veins of pure gold stories in that piece but PG either doesn't want to explore them properly (so relies on blind dead end inference) or simply knows nothing juicy about them (probably the latter as they are very juicy)

Edited by thaiwanderer
Posted

related subject:

item—4 --- on VDO at http://thainews.prd.go.th/newsenglish/prev...hp?news_id=1146

or

The Consumer Protection Board stated that complaints they received mostly involved land and property development cases.

Housing project development comes top among consumers’ complaints sent to the Consumer Protection Board in Bangkok, according to the Secretary General of the Consumer Protection Board, Mr. Niroj Charoenprakorb. He cited examples of the issues, such as land ownership not transferred, land still under mortgage, no further development as promised and inferior quality after completion. Others include vehicles which involved cars and motorcycle ownership transferal and condominiums not built as planned after down-payments. Mr. Niroj however stressed that not many cases are reported from regional provinces and that each region has different topics of complaints. Asked how the board resolves the cases, the Secretary General of the Consumer Protection Board said it assigns a provincial body to step in and mediate negotiation or compromise between two parties. He said around 50% make agreements while others are passed on to court for settlement. The court presently grants rights for consumer to bring cases up to courts.

Andaman News NBT TV (VHF dial) at 8.30am broadcast to Phang Nga, Krabi & Phuket provinces Wednesday 3 June 2009

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...