That doesn't make any sense. You're basically saying there doesn't have to be evidence to accuse someone, and the fact that no charges were filed somehow isn't relevant. I'm not claiming, "No charges = innocent." I'm saying if you're going to call someone a pedophile, the burden is on you to produce evidence. That's how accusations work. You said, "absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence." That's true in a philosophical sense, but it's not how our legal system works. We don't assume someone committed a crime unless they can prove they didn't. We require evidence before making the accusation in the first place. Trump has been investigated more than just about any politician in U.S. history. If you have evidence he committed crimes against children, present it. If you don't, then calling him a pedophile is just speculation, not fact. You keep asking me to prove a negative. That's impossible. The person making the accusation has to provide the evidence, not the person denying it.
Create an account or sign in to comment