BrissyBoy Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 Maybe buffy is a troll. If he is being extradites and the dutch and thai governments have had to go to all expense and trouble to bring him back then wouldn't buffy be under police "care". I may be wrong but then i can't see why he would be posting here if he was in the midst of an extradition case. Just my thoughts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_Pat_Pong Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Maybe buffy is a troll.If he is being extradites and the dutch and thai governments have had to go to all expense and trouble to bring him back then wouldn't buffy be under police "care". I may be wrong but then i can't see why he would be posting here if he was in the midst of an extradition case. Just my thoughts <{POST_SNAPBACK}> He certainly ain't too fast in clearing the murky waters. You might be right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jef Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Do we want yet another low life crim here ? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Maybe require police report before allowing member status? I could come up with some additional requirements Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon43 Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Please Buffy!!!!! Will you answer the simple question put to you before? What is the crime that you are accused of? How can you really expect informed comment and advice if you don't make us aware of the facts?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thetyim Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 According to his post he is not accused of anything, he has to appear as a witness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_Pat_Pong Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 According to his post he is not accused of anything, he has to appear as a witness. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I cannot imagine a Thai Court acceding to an order of extradition or rendition just for a reluctant witness to front a foreign Court in a witness capacity. That is not the purpose of lawful extradition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffy Posted February 28, 2005 Author Share Posted February 28, 2005 the penanty will not exeed 4000,= Euro. !!!! Or 3 weeks behind bars !!!! christ , even in holland child murderers get lighter sentences than that , what terrible crime are you accused of ?? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> At least you are funy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffy Posted February 28, 2005 Author Share Posted February 28, 2005 According to his post he is not accused of anything, he has to appear as a witness. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I cannot imagine a Thai Court acceding to an order of extradition or rendition just for a reluctant witness to front a foreign Court in a witness capacity. That is not the purpose of lawful extradition. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Mr. Pat Pong does not seem to be very helpfull. In the meantime I am communicating through someone's PM. It is there where I better give the full details of my story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfie Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 As much as we would like to help you, as a few posters have already said we need more information. If you just want your question answered, then the answer has been posted a few times now... Apply for a visa in your home country, that way you will know the answer before you even book a fight ticket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuartinBKK Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 All is in hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buadhai Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 All is in hand. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> To be revealed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_Pat_Pong Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 According to his post he is not accused of anything, he has to appear as a witness. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I cannot imagine a Thai Court acceding to an order of extradition or rendition just for a reluctant witness to front a foreign Court in a witness capacity. That is not the purpose of lawful extradition. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Mr. Pat Pong does not seem to be very helpfull. In the meantime I am communicating through someone's PM. It is there where I better give the full details of my story. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It is nevertheless factually correct according to Law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neeranam Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 When someone hides their crime, I always presume the worst. Why otherwise would someone not reveal. Sorry, Buffy, but to me you are child murderer or a paedophile. Hope you are not allowed back here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yamaharr1 Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 Remember it is a crime to prosecute with out cause as some of the people on this board are doing. They have him now and he will have his day in court to face his crime. In which case couldn’t be too bad if he is using the computer and not locked away. I do have 1 thing that does bother me is extradition costs would have to exceed $10,000 or $15,000 dollars I don’t think they would come after you for something that would be a fine of only 4000 euro or a few months in jail. So this leads me to believe that prisons have internet access, are you on house arrest or in a holding facility? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkmadness Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 Remember it is a crime to prosecute with out cause as some of the people on this board are doing. They have him now and he will have his day in court to face his crime.In which case couldn’t be too bad if he is using the computer and not locked away. I do have 1 thing that does bother me is extradition costs would have to exceed $10,000 or $15,000 dollars I don’t think they would come after you for something that would be a fine of only 4000 euro or a few months in jail. So this leads me to believe that prisons have internet access, are you on house arrest or in a holding facility? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Dutch prisons are pretty easy going so my mate said, so I expect maybe got net access there. Neeraram, bit strong aint it? Don't know what the guy has done at all, let him speak out a bit more before judging him, or stuartinbkk, spill the beans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkmadness Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 He said he was a witness and going to be prosecuted, maybe part of a larger organisation, drugs maybe, being Holland and all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Boy Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 Holland locking people up for drugs?, that cant be right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkmadness Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 Lots of organised export there. Anyway, could be anything, but curious now, c'mon OP fill us in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buffy Posted March 13, 2005 Author Share Posted March 13, 2005 Remember it is a crime to prosecute with out cause as some of the people on this board are doing. They have him now and he will have his day in court to face his crime.In which case couldn’t be too bad if he is using the computer and not locked away. I do have 1 thing that does bother me is extradition costs would have to exceed $10,000 or $15,000 dollars I don’t think they would come after you for something that would be a fine of only 4000 euro or a few months in jail. So this leads me to believe that prisons have internet access, are you on house arrest or in a holding facility? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Dutch prisons are pretty easy going so my mate said, so I expect maybe got net access there. Neeraram, bit strong aint it? Don't know what the guy has done at all, let him speak out a bit more before judging him, or stuartinbkk, spill the beans. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thank you Madness. Afer being exradited to Holland in december, I have been in prison for questioning for ten days only. My case has been in the press ( TV and newspaper) and will go to cord by the end of april. In the meanime I am free to go, e- mail, make telephone calls , send faxes and so on. If you have any reasonable comment ( not the same low level as Neeraram and some other bullshiters) you can always reach me directly. [email protected] or GSM 06 11 44 59 43. And don't be stupid, in Holand we have no e-mail or mobile phones in prison! For Stuart, sorry I can't reply your question. No acces to your PM box. But the anwer is ,, no problem,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frumau Posted March 17, 2005 Share Posted March 17, 2005 max 4000 euro or 3 weeks behind bars.. That sounds harsh according to Dutch standards but not too Thai standards. So I presume it will not have been that bad an act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
booma Posted March 17, 2005 Share Posted March 17, 2005 According to his post he is not accused of anything, he has to appear as a witness. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> But then he said he is not expected to be found guilty and if he was then the penalty would be light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajarn Posted March 17, 2005 Share Posted March 17, 2005 Sorry, but it sure looks trollish to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_Pat_Pong Posted March 17, 2005 Share Posted March 17, 2005 Sorry, but it sure looks trollish to me. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think you are on the money Ajarn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surin Posted March 17, 2005 Share Posted March 17, 2005 Sorry, but it sure looks trollish to me. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think you are on the money Ajarn <{POST_SNAPBACK}> He's a troll alright...He would have been in front of a court in Thailand with certain information strong enough for the Dutch authorities to prove an extradition case. His passport would have been stamped. They do not extradite for a trivial matter or a financial matter or for giving evidence unless it could be proven in a Thai Court that you are facing a jail term. Next troll...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_Pat_Pong Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Sorry, but it sure looks trollish to me. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think you are on the money Ajarn <{POST_SNAPBACK}> He's a troll alright...He would have been in front of a court in Thailand with certain information strong enough for the Dutch authorities to prove an extradition case. His passport would have been stamped. They do not extradite for a trivial matter or a financial matter or for giving evidence unless it could be proven in a Thai Court that you are facing a jail term. Next troll...... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Extradition doesn't apply to reluctant witnesses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neeranam Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Sorry, but it sure looks trollish to me. I saw this WAY back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frumau Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 But I am curious to see further posts of Buffy though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_Pat_Pong Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 He's working up a new story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now