aeon Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 (edited) http://www.roundshot.ch/xml_1/internet/de/...8/d925/f934.cfm edit: wrong digit, it is 160 mega pixel Edited August 18, 2009 by aeon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywais Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 edit: wrong digit, it is 160 mega pixel Corrected it. Impressive piece of hardware. Bit daunting on disk space though > File sizes raw (16-bit): 307 MB, tiff (48-bit): 922 MB. 1000 Photos and you've pretty much filled up that Terabyte drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeon Posted August 18, 2009 Author Share Posted August 18, 2009 (edited) edit: wrong digit, it is 160 mega pixel Corrected it. Impressive piece of hardware. Bit daunting on disk space though > File sizes raw (16-bit): 307 MB, tiff (48-bit): 922 MB. 1000 Photos and you've pretty much filled up that Terabyte drive. thanks for the edit. Yes it is, I would handle to save and transfer those huge files, but I can't handle that price for an hobby. Edited August 18, 2009 by aeon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Vulcan Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 (edited) edit: wrong digit, it is 160 mega pixel Corrected it. Impressive piece of hardware. Bit daunting on disk space though > File sizes raw (16-bit): 307 MB, tiff (48-bit): 922 MB. 1000 Photos and you've pretty much filled up that Terabyte drive. thanks for the edit. Yes it is, I would handle to save and transfer those huge files, but I can't handle that price for an hobby. It's also a "scan Back" model. Scans the 3 RGB channels seperately and then YOU convert it all. Great resolution IF everything stays perfectly still. If it moves - ya dead! Phase One did these years ago and indeed you can (occassionally) get Phase One scan backs on Ebay for use with (say) Hasselblad V systems for $500 Interesting concept though Edited August 18, 2009 by The Vulcan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aeon Posted August 18, 2009 Author Share Posted August 18, 2009 500$ sounds more affordable as hobby, or stitch together as many photos as you need and you will get high res panorama, more slower process but far more affordable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywais Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 500$ sounds more affordable as hobby, or stitch together as many photos as you need and you will get high res panorama, more slower process but far more affordable Like this > Gigapixel photos with any digital camera or this > 13 Gigapixel Panorama Some more interesting high pixel count images > Gigapan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now