Nor would they. Hence why the scenarios are useless when discussing the Iran US situation. That's precisely the point, and you've somehow managed to miss it. The comparison isn't suggesting Singapore, Malaysia or Denmark would do what Iran has done. It's highlighting that despite having similarly strategic maritime chokepoints, they don't. They don't threaten to close international waterways, seize commercial shipping, or attempt to leverage freedom of navigation for political or economic gain. That is exactly what makes the Iranian regime exceptional. The comparison exists to highlight the contrast, not the similarity. If every nation bordering a major natural chokepoint behaved as Iran has repeatedly threatened to, global trade would be held hostage. The fact that virtually none do is precisely why Iran's conduct stands out and why the comparison is entirely relevant.
Create an account or sign in to comment