Red Shirts To March On Bangkok Streets Again

[moresomekl]

I said COULD , not WILL . Please ... .

Yes everywhere in the wolrld is like Australia , a MP can disagree with his party on some particular piece

of legislation and vote against it . Why not ? Here it is not the same case .

But that's what I'm trying to explain. It is basically the same case. They use the same system as Australia and UK.

Could ... will ... whatever ... the point is, if the government COULD fall every 10 days, then using your logic, you COULD have elections every 10 days instead.

OK fine . Here one possible scenario

1) Chavalit or whichever smaller party (maybe paid by Thaksin) defects to the PTP soon .

2) PTP comes in power right ?

3) If PTP do then a early general election AND PTP win then they dont need Thaksin , if they loose

, same Thaksin out .

Same same and good .

But you say no need for election right , so no election ok fine

4) PTP coalition shaky , realise that they cant win at the next general election without Thaksin

4) PTP calls back Thaksin

Good ?

Might have a coup at any of those points

Good ?

Well other than the fact Chavalit is ALREADY in PTP and so won't defect to PTP...

He was totally sillent all week, and then springs into action alleging his great mediator skills.

But Prem staff says he was too sick to see him,

until Chavalit reports this publicly,

and then Prems people say, 'what is he talking about'.

Oops. Can't even get into the office...

And he is NOW trying to talk OTHER parties into defecting... wonderful mediation efforts.

Look the boss offers more money!!! He told me so!!!

Yes am sorry some confusion . Chavalit has been around for long time , he was there already when i visited Thailand first time back in 1988 . Did'nt really follow his latest escapades .

You met him ? Yes the money makes sense must be a lot of it else why . Thaksin subject is a political killer , even the BBC reported that the red shirts seem to tone down their support for the self declared saviour of the masses . Perhaps the red shirt visit to BKK is not that much a bad thing , opened some eyes amongst the red . As we say in France , "les voyages forment la jeunesse" .

[Publicus]

When is a 'protest march' riding motorbikes around the streets of Bangkok?

I think they need to told they are just hooligans on bikes!

And why are most of them young Thai mafia looking guys?

Is that the image they are trying to show off?

Watching China TV they showed blood on gates & rubbish that the red group has left behind

in their 'protest'. Who pays for all the clean up? The Government of course.

Send the red group a bill.

The People's Republic of China leadership in Beijing is watching Thailand closely. With half the PRC population living in the countryside on less than USD $2 a day, the red leaders up there know they could be watching their future right here in Thailand these past several years.

[Nuchanart]

When is a 'protest march' riding motorbikes around the streets of Bangkok?

I think they need to told they are just hooligans on bikes!

And why are most of them young Thai mafia looking guys?

Is that the image they are trying to show off?

Watching China TV they showed blood on gates & rubbish that the red group has left behind

in their 'protest'. Who pays for all the clean up? The Government of course.

Send the red group a bill.

The People's Republic of China leadership in Beijing is watching Thailand closely. With half the PRC population living in the countryside on less than USD $2 a day, the red leaders up there know they could be watching their future right here in Thailand these past several years.

You mean capture Peking Airport for 9 days?

[WAERTH]

The People's Republic of China leadership in Beijing is watching Thailand closely. With half the PRC population living in the countryside on less than USD $2 a day, the red leaders up there know they could be watching their future right here in Thailand these past several years.

The Chinese government would have opened fire on the protestors before they even came this far ....... It is funny that both call themselves "People's" isn't it?

W

[Publicus]

The People's Republic of China took a month and more in 1989 to send in the tanks against the democracy demonstrators in Tienaman Square, but one reason it took so long was that the uni students and so many others from around the country who traveled great distances by super slow trains to join them were supported by so many citizens of Beijing, who themselves stopped the army several times when the army attempted to move in before its final successful attempt. (It was the ominous and grim report of the mayor of Beijing concerning the citizenry of Beijing to Deng Xiao Peng that prompted Deng to order the massacre of anybody and everybody in the square and in the city streets who were standing in the way of the People's "Liberation" Army trying to move into the square.)

Thailand has had its lesser scale Tienamen moments, particulary in 1973 and in 1976 - also somewhat in 1991 - but there's been nothing on the scale or intensity of the 1989 massacre. The time of the PRC to be today's Thailand is coming. The question is when. The magnitude of the scale of it in the PRC, by sheer numbers of peasants, is the nightmare of the tyrants in Beijing.

A major reason the Sino-Thai Thaksin is unwelcome in the PRC is that his presence there would be too suggestive of the danger staring the Beijing tyrants in their face anytime attention would be called to their otherwise fellow tyrant of Thailand. Maybe Thaksin might consider going to the PRC to organize the rural poor there. It certainly would result in Thailand being relieved of its Thaksin probelm with finality.