Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Patong CCTV units on the blink

phuket-CANDID-CAMERA-Critics-have-long-maintained-that-CCTV-surveillance-jeopardizes-privacy-rights-in-the-name-of-security-enhancement-1-nRAOVvw.jpg

CANDID CAMERA: Critics have long maintained that CCTV surveillance jeopardizes privacy rights in the name of 'security enhancement'.

PHUKET: -- The majority of closed-circuit television (CCTV) security cameras in Patong don’t work, the Gazette has learned.

There are more than 20 security cameras sited in key locations in Patong, but only eight are still functioning properly.

Most of the ten CCTV units provided by Patong Municipality are still in operation, but most of the units provided by the Phuket Provincial Administrative Organization (PPAO) are out of order due to lack of maintenance, say reliable sources at Kathu Police station.

The only PPAO unit still in operation is near the tourist information office, the source say.

Among the units installed by Patong Municipality, those at Wat Suwan Kiriwong junction, 50 Pi Road junction and Patong Municipal Football Field are also out of order.

Kathu Police Superintendent Arayapan Pukbuakhao said "CCTV units along Soi Bangla are working, but the rest have had problems for over a year. We plan to ask Patong Municipality and the PPAO for budgets to get them fixed or replaced, but it will take a while because these will need to be funded under budgets for the next fiscal year.”

CCTV surveillance has been promoted in Phuket in recent years as a way of increasing security on the island, which has just over 1,000 police officers for a population estimated to exceed one million people at peak tourism periods.

As expressed in the Gazette's online forum, letters to the editor, and a poll conducted by the newspaper 3 months ago, Gazette readers have been skeptical about the efficacy of CCTV in combating crime, however.

pglogo.jpg

-- Phuket Gazette 2010-04-15

[newsfooter][/newsfooter]

Posted

The story behind the high number of malfunctions, as I understand it, is that the contract was intended to provide quality equipment but it was substituted for inferior equipment. (Could be just another urban myth, of course.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...