Mistakes happen often such as refusing an EU Family permit when as per the Metock case the applicant and the sponsor have little to prove other than that they have met and they meet the rules.

UK/Vac refusing to take a Fiance/proposed civil partnership application under paragraph 290 of the Immigration rules, after travelling 12 km across Bangkok to show them the rules they accepted this and then duly charged me 300 baht for the pleasure of printing the application form they had defaced.

Various complaints have been raised and we are awaiting a reply.

You don't appear to have answered the questions in the earlier post. Have you passed your concerns on to the appropriate authorities, and, if so, what was the response to your allegations of incompetence ?

Further, what exactly does " but when you deal with applications daily things are not always as they should be" mean ?

With respect, if this is the standard of advice your company gives, then I would not be happy to use you.

Of course we have passed various concerns to the relevant people.

As i said things are not always as they seem an example is Visa denied.

As I said the UK/BA have the right to say we do not believe he/she will return to their host country and a visa is denied, you may well meet the standard criteria for a visa but you still may not qualify for entry clearance .

As other posters have found you have what you believe is a fantastic application but the ECO decides in his/her opinion that they have concerns and it is refused.

Edited April 27, 201016 yr by ThaiVisaExpress

Mistakes happen often such as refusing an EU Family permit when as per the Metock case the applicant and the sponsor have little to prove other than that they have met and they meet the rules.

UK/Vac refusing to take a Fiance/proposed civil partnership application under paragraph 290 of the Immigration rules, after travelling 12 km across Bangkok to show them the rules they accepted this and then duly charged me 300 baht for the pleasure of printing the application form they had defaced.

Various complaints have been raised and we are awaiting a reply.

You don't appear to have answered the questions in the earlier post. Have you passed your concerns on to the appropriate authorities, and, if so, what was the response to your allegations of incompetence ?

Further, what exactly does " but when you deal with applications daily things are not always as they should be" mean ?

With respect, if this is the standard of advice your company gives, then I would not be happy to use you.

Of course we have passed various concerns to the relevant people.

As i said things are not always as they seem an example is Visa denied.

As I said the UK/BA have the right to say we do not believe he/she will return to their host country and a visa is denied, you may well meet the standard criteria for a visa but you still may not qualify for entry clearance .

As other posters have found you have what you believe is a fantastic application but the ECO decides in his/her opinion that they have concerns and it is refused.

I'm sorry. I may be a bit dense, but I don't understand your reply. You failed to answer my first question, and your explanation, referring to applications from a blind Pakistani cricket team, has absolutely no relevance to the subject of a Thai female seeking a visit visa to the UK. I still wouldn't use your service if I had to base my choice on your responses; I'm not sure I would understand your advice. Sorry.