Jump to content

Thai Restriction Of Speech "Not Helpful" : British MP


webfact

Recommended Posts

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Thai restriction of speech "not helpful" : British MP

By Supalak Ganjanakhundee

The Nation

gallery_327_1086_2494.jpg

Brown

BANGKOK: -- A visiting British politician said yesterday the state of emergency maintained by the Thai government in many provinces would not be helpful to the process of reaching a political settlement in the country.

"There may be in any country an exceptional circumstance, but as a general rule restriction on freedom of expression is generally not helpful in creating an open civil society," said Jeremy Brown, Minister of State for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

Brown was in Thailand on Sunday and yesterday on a leg of his Asian tour taking him also to the Philippines, Hong Kong and Indonesia.

The British minister met on Sunday with Foreign Minister Kasit Piromya to discuss various issues, including the government's unilateral offer of national reconciliation.

"I stressed with him the importance of reconciliation and the need for everyone in Thailand to feel the political process is able to reflect accurately the will of the people," Brown told reporters.

People in Thailand and everywhere in the world want to live in a stable prosperous country where the rule of law is respected and their views about politics and about society can be given accurate expression, he said.

Brown also met members of opposition Pheu Thai Party who offered differing views on the political situation and the state of emergency.

The minister also visited Rajprasong intersection, scene of much of the protesting by anti-government red- shirt groups in April and May.

"I want to see a political settlement in Thailand where the election reflects accurately the will of the people. I want to see, around the world, democracy and freedom of expression, reconciliation and stability," Brown told the audience in a luncheon speech hosted by the British Chamber of Commerce.

"But it is not the job of the British government to tell the people of Thailand which political system they should have, or what their political will should be," he said.

"That is a task for Thailand to create the settled political order that works for the people, regardless of their political opinion," he said.

"We hope Thailand will be a successful country, having a stable political system in which people enjoy democracy."

On Burma, minister Brown said the new British government would maintain the same stance toward the junta-ruled country as the previous one.

"The situation in Burma in terms of human rights and the freedom of people in Burma is unacceptable. The election planned late this year will not be a legitimate expression of the wills of the people of Burma," he said.

Burma planned to hold its first general election in two decades late this year; but the opposition will not be included and more than 2000 political prisoners are being detained.

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2010-07-20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should of course remember that my mother country England has draconian laws forbidding comment that may offend anyone who may not be of the same ethic or religious persuasion as ones self .

The Honourable member claimed expenses listed below in his pursuit of power, these expenses are not accountable as past events have proved.

Methinks the Liberal Democrat Member of Parliament (MP) for Taunton Deane is poking his nose into matters that according to his responsibility list posted below do not concern him.

Responsibilities

  • South East Asia and Far East; Shanghai Expo
  • Caribbean
  • Central America
  • South America
  • Australasia and Pacific
  • Olympics
  • Public diplomacy
  • Human rights
  • Consular policy
  • Migration
  • Drugs and International Crime

EXPENSES CLAIM RECORD. Jeremy Brown M.P. 2005/062006/072007/08

£28,395.00£20,436.00£19,662.00 ----£1,053.00£1,053.00£1,114.00 ----£1,306.00£1,306.00£1,965.00 ------£11,205.00 ----£1,802.00£272.00£404.00 ----£6,979.00£7,482.00£8,341.00 ------- ----£21,565.00£22,094.00£23,074.00 ----£74,458.00£87,391.00£90,251.00 ----£3,260.00£3,142.00£4,989.00Total----£138,818.00£143,176.00£161,005.00

Edited by siampolee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a pompous dick. I'm sure Quinton will be carpeted over these outspoken statements from the British coalition.

"I want to see a political settlement in Thailand where the election reflects accurately the will of the people." - he'll be campaining for PR in Thailand next.

Get back to your combine harvester dimwit and relieve yourself of these delusions of global grandeur!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the last election accurately reflected the will of the people.

Large minorities voted for the PPP and the Democrats. The smaller minorities and the Democrats have formed government. That's similar to what happened in England, isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and just how does a election where the votes are bought reflect the will of the people.

I personally feel that the problems in this country can not be ironed out politically. To me that smacks of communism. The people themselves must do it. How can you mandate equality if the people are unwilling to except it. Until Thailand actually educates the population nothing will change. People need a education and the ability to reason things out.

Recently Air Asia ran a one hour special on the internal problems with Thailand. They featured a women red shirt demonstrator who could only say we have no democracy. She had no idea of what democracy was. All she knew was what the leaders had told her. Unfortunately there is many in Thailand bound by a lack of education and blind obedience to people who tell them what they want to hear. The answer must come from the people with knowledge of what is going on working together for a peaceful Thailand. You can not legislate this. It must be learned.

JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was discussing various problems in Thailand with the Thai foriegn Minister , he gave HIS OPINIONS on what he thought about these problems , he did not just stand up and cascade rhetoric to the press about his thoughs and feelings , this has been warped and twisted to suit some posters OPINIONS together with defamatory remarks about his being a farmer etc .

What has happened to TV posters of late ? There is often mention of 'Grumpy old men' and thier comments , how do you think some of you come across on this thread ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to see a political settlement in Thailand where the election reflects accurately the will of the people.

Well, you got it already. 2/3 of Thai voted against the Thaksin party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are some posters here so outraged by what this fellow said?

It is a fact the there is political censorship in Thailand on all levels (113,000 websites blocked) and nobody dares to express his opinion freely. This suppression of freedom has penetrated all aspects of Thai society, even the private sector (just look a the rules in this forum). Even ad are censored (Thailand we apologise).

Without freedom of expression on all aspects of Thai politics, there can be no true democracy. The future of this country is at stakes but we cannot talk about it. LM is used to silence opponents.

It is very good that someone has the courage to speak openly, but even this British MP had to wait until he was outside Thailand to speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was discussing various problems in Thailand with the Thai foriegn Minister , he gave HIS OPINIONS on what he thought about these problems , he did not just stand up and cascade rhetoric to the press about his thoughs and feelings , this has been warped and twisted to suit some posters OPINIONS together with defamatory remarks about his being a farmer etc .

What has happened to TV posters of late ? There is often mention of 'Grumpy old men' and thier comments , how do you think some of you come across on this thread ?

he was acting in an official capacity - therefore "HIS OPINIONS" are those of the UK government.

With that in mind, I find his remarks quite patronising to Thailand and to some large degree, ill researched and ill informed.

It is "MY OPINION" that he is a blundering oik who has demonstrated the statesmanship of a turnip.

I too hail from Somerset and Browne from London so I find it amusing to make reference to farming for a guy who clearly came there on a political career move no doubt assisted by his family connections

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my job, it is a sound tactic to make staff aware they are being watched/monitored/evaluated.

Both parties, myself and the staff, know that if my advice is ignored and the staff choose to do as little as possible, then because of the roles we hold, precious little will happen in terms of consequences. However, the tactic often yields a lot in terms of results, effort and progress.

This is what is going on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oye bey up frum zumerzet , frum Briál on zumerzet zide , that does not in any way infer my thinking has to aligne with yours , I am a free thinker , I am aware his comments could be aligned with government policy or thinking , but he did make some good points that Thai do not wish to be brought to the light of day or discussed in any honest way , shape or form .

Until or unless the mode of thinking changes , nothing of worth will come of any or all think-tanks .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khun Kasit,

Please kick Mr. Brown asap.

It is obvious that Mr. have drunk too much over dinner last night.

Else, he might just be a puppet for Khun Thaksin.

Regards

Rucharee

(an open letter)

Edited by Rucharee
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it were not so serious it could be laughable how some postes seem to beleive any criticism of a country or its policies is bad, especially when stated by a foreign politician (in this case a foreign minister - whose job requires him to consider non-British governments!). This country, like many in the 3rd world (and some in te 1st!) does not have the ability to change itself when the populous are so easily bought and so under-educated, the politicians and authorities so corrupt, and the political will centred on short term personal gains rather than do a good job for the country. Sure, all counties suffer from this in part, but when all points come together, there is no internal change (at least not without massive blood letting - revolution - which no sane man (or woman) wants to see).

To call laws protecting minorities from attack and discrimination as draconian says a lot about that poster - and relying on expense claims made in an effort to show a parallel of corruptiuon is silly given that all his claims were legitimate and legal (hence he is not under police investigation as some are) - the fact that it is not particularly moral to claim just because you can, does not make one corrupt - just desperate or greedy

To those who can't seem to tell: When he says, "I believe..." he means personally; when he says "We want..." he is talking for the British Government.

Can anyone actually argue against his words in a logical debate? (unlikely here unfortunatly) becasue he simply states what he (and the government - see last para)

would like to see - not what is the case - it also seems obvious he is talking about the current crissis and not history either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Khun Kasit,

Please kick Mr. Brown asap.

It is obvious that Mr. have drunk too much over dinner last night.

Else, he might just be a puppet for Khun Thaksin.

Regards

Rucharee

(an open letter)

Yeah right - Thaksin controls the British Govermnet now too (that's why he can't get a visa to go there!) - geez some people should have their keyboards impounded!

So, as a Thai you are disagreeing with th following (i.,e. you don't want...)

- The government to know ... the importance of reconciliation and the need for everyone in Thailand to feel the political process is able to reflect accurately the will of the people.

- Political settlement in Thailand where the election reflects accurately the will of the people.

- Democracy and freedom of expression, reconciliation and stability worldwide.

- Thailand to create a settled political order that works for the people, regardless of their political opinions.

- Thailand to be a successful country, with a stable political system in which people enjoy democracy.

- That this is a task for Thailand to create a settled political order that works for the people, regardless of their political opinions (and without foreign intervention)

That is, you want anarchy, instability and/or foreign intervention. Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'wolf5370' date='2010-07-20 12:02' timestamp='1279602169' post='3760642']

'Rucharee' date='2010-07-20 11:42' timestamp='1279600970' post='3760608']

Khun Kasit,

Please kick Mr. Brown asap.

It is obvious that Mr. have drunk too much over dinner last night.

Else, he might just be a puppet for Khun Thaksin.

Regards

Rucharee

(an open letter)

Yeah right - Thaksin controls the British Govermnet now too (that's why he can't get a visa to go there!) - geez some people should have their keyboards impounded!

So, as a Thai you are disagreeing with th following (i.,e. you don't want...)

- The government to know ... the importance of reconciliation and the need for everyone in Thailand to feel the political process is able to reflect accurately the will of the people.

- Political settlement in Thailand where the election reflects accurately the will of the people.

- Democracy and freedom of expression, reconciliation and stability worldwide.

- Thailand to create a settled political order that works for the people, regardless of their political opinions.

- Thailand to be a successful country, with a stable political system in which people enjoy democracy.

- That this is a task for Thailand to create a settled political order that works for the people, regardless of their political opinions (and without foreign intervention)

That is, you want anarchy, instability and/or foreign intervention. Really?

That last response by rucharee should give some indication just as to why Thailand needs some moral support on what can (should) be done to cure what ails the country , she even comes across as educated , pity the thinking (guidance) of the lesser educated masses . Thinking has also been admonished by many on this forum as not a Thai trait (teaching) , not my country or yours , it belongs to Thai to screw it up as they so desire , you just happen to have the need to live with whatever they decide .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are some posters here so outraged by what this fellow said?

It is a fact the there is political censorship in Thailand on all levels (113,000 websites blocked) and nobody dares to express his opinion freely. This suppression of freedom has penetrated all aspects of Thai society, even the private sector (just look a the rules in this forum). Even ad are censored (Thailand we apologise).

Without freedom of expression on all aspects of Thai politics, there can be no true democracy. The future of this country is at stakes but we cannot talk about it. LM is used to silence opponents.

It is very good that someone has the courage to speak openly, but even this British MP had to wait until he was outside Thailand to speak.

^^ Couldn't agree more. Well said.

Sure the red shirts (for all their rhetoric to the contrary) are entirely undemocratic. But keeping them down by undemocratic means just creates a dictatorship by another color.

It's truly amazing to see, BTW, how quickly freedom of speech restrictions get out of hand. In the beginning, it's always about something everyone can agree on - child pornography! But approve that, and 5 minutes later they're happily using the system to shut down websites and forums of political opponents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a pompous dick. I'm sure Quinton will be carpeted over these outspoken statements from the British coalition.

"I want to see a political settlement in Thailand where the election reflects accurately the will of the people." - he'll be campaining for PR in Thailand next.

Get back to your combine harvester dimwit and relieve yourself of these delusions of global grandeur!

The middle sentence seems pretty reasonable to me.

Don't we all want to see an election that reflects the will of the people ??

I thought that was what elections were supposed to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that it is improper for a British MP to comment or intervene in a sovereign country's political situation. How would he like it if a Thai MP went to London and made comments in the public arena?

Why not ??

It's called freedom of speech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as it's THAI Democracy then , anything go's, including freedom of free speech, every country has a freedom of speech problem, these in many cases are to protect people from unwarranted attacks,one would emagine that the very top end of town in Thailand wouldn't fair to well in a free speech society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should of course remember that my mother country England has draconian laws forbidding comment that may offend anyone who may not be of the same ethic or religious persuasion as ones self .

Can you tell me more about?

Does that include that you can't be a openly and proud white supremacist anymore?

Was the BNP unfairly treated? Should we feel sorry?

I am wondering why these people even travel to other countries instead of staying at their 'superior' home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I for one am not interested in politics but would like to express my views.

Having lived in South Africa for 10 years (being some of the best years of my life) then moving to the UK for 14 years (being the worst years of my life) and now living in Thailand (returning to the best years of my life) i cannot get my head round why all you dimwits call for the Freedom of Speech bull crap!

Thailand has obviously been doing something right otherwise why would all you farangs be living here, eating their delicious food, dating their girls, living it up here if all was chaos and in shambles? Just poke your nose out of business that doesnt invole you, if you dont like it go back to the "marvelous" UK and be happy there.

South Africa with its unstable goverment and Thailand with its unsable goverment seem to be the best places in the world ive lived, including Brazil which i have visited and love, but the UK has been a nightmare, so i ask myself, this freedom of speech crap which surfaces all the time is utter nonsense. I mean the last time i returned to the UK the coach driver told everybody to put their seat belts on "Its the new law now" just bringing back the hatred i had for the country. (dont give me the saftey speech i will just IGNORE YOU) aswell if i dont want to wear a helmut on my motorbike let it be my choice and not yours, if i die i die, its a choice i made myself. The UK has so many laws you cant even take a sh*t without getting fined or whatnot.

Is the UK really all that free, you cant wear your cross on a British Airways flight, it might offend other religions <deleted>!! and in the riots muslims plaquards stating muslims are taking over the UK and much worse ones shown on BBC news yet nothing happens but when its to do with Christmas or The St george flag its all up in arms, so really are you really free in the UK or controlled ants. (let it be known im not christian or care for the differences in religions just stating my views) You cant even walk in london without a CCTV camera up on you, and now maybe new IDs for everyone. hmmm.....

All i can say is i love Thailand, they have obviously been doing something right all these centuries for all you flocks of farangs to be migrating here, just poke your nose out of matters which dont concern you, let the country continue its own gracious path without flaming about how Thailand is in a shambles i see constantly on these forum.

I truley feel free here, and i Love Thailand, despit politics, same goes for when i was in SA, it seems to be a reccuring thing, less stable goverments make for a more better countries or is that just a coincidence.

And by all means as ive stated before please return to your western country if Thailand isnt up to your standards.........but something tells me youll rather not and continue staying in Thailand........hmmmm

Just my 2 cents.

P.S sorry for any spelling mistakes!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to see a political settlement in Thailand where the election reflects accurately the will of the people.

Well, you got it already. 2/3 of Thai voted against the Thaksin party.

orlyy.jpg

They voted "against" the "Thaksin party"???

How did they do this? Any how many people voted "against" the "Abhisit party"? more or less?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to see a political settlement in Thailand where the election reflects accurately the will of the people.

Well, you got it already. 2/3 of Thai voted against the Thaksin party.

orlyy.jpg

They voted "against" the "Thaksin party"???

How did they do this? Any how many people voted "against" the "Abhisit party"? more or less?

How many people? Or how many votes? People in some districts are granted one vote while others are granted two or even three votes.

If you are talking about the number of people who voted in the last election then the Democrats beat the PPP by a small margin, as evidenced by the proportional vote results.

If you are talking about the number of total votes then the PPP won by a small, but somewhat larger margin, as evidenced by the number of seats they won in parliament.

Edited by way2muchcoffee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to see a political settlement in Thailand where the election reflects accurately the will of the people.

Well, you got it already. 2/3 of Thai voted against the Thaksin party.

orlyy.jpg

They voted "against" the "Thaksin party"???

How did they do this? Any how many people voted "against" the "Abhisit party"? more or less?

How many people? Or how many votes? People in some districts are granted one vote while others are granted two or even three votes.

If you are talking about the number of people who voted in the last election then the Democrats beat the PPP by a small margin, as evidenced by the proportional vote results.

If you are talking about the number of total votes then the PPP won by a small, but somewhat larger margin, as evidenced by the number of seats they won in parliament.

I am talking about the "against the Thaksin party" votes DP25 is talking about. I have no clue what that is, the "against vote" nor what the "Thaksin party" might be. So i ask for more information.

You are talking about the last election, there the newcomer and 'underdog' PPP won 233 seats and the Democrats won 165 seats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...