Jump to content

Thailand Less Free Now, Activists Say


webfact

Recommended Posts

Country less free now: activists

By Pravit Rojanaphruk

The Nation on Sunday

Some former activists who opposed the 2006 military coup - four years ago today - said Thai society under the Abhisit Vejjajiva administration enjoys less democratic freedom than after the military junta ousted Thaksin Shinawatra.

"I don't think it is democratic now. In fact, things have regressed. Many [opposition] media outlets are shut and even the blocking of websites was not as extensive then compared to now," said Chotisak Onsoong, former co-coordinator of the 19 September Anti-Coup Network.

"Also we're under the emergency decree. Students in Chiang Rai who protested against the decree or a teen idol who protested against Abhisit became a big fuss [for the authorities] although it should be a normal part of any democratic system."

Four years ago, anti-coup activist Sirote Klampaiboon, then a PhD student at the University of Hawaii, drafted an open letter signed by other Thai students at foreign universities denouncing the Council for National Security (CNS), which overthrew the Thaksin administration in the evening on Sept 19. "[Thailand] has not become more democratic and on many fronts the situation has in fact deteriorated," said Sirote, now a lecturer in politics and human rights at Mahidol University.

Sirote pointed out, however, that political repression under the current administration was more complex. "The rule by emergency decree is one of the clearest examples. It turns what would otherwise be legal political activities into something illegal, such as the right to political assembly by more than five persons. People also accepted the violence unleashed by the military [in April and May]."

Kengkij Kitirianglarp, now a political science lecturer at Kasetsart University, was a PhD student at Chulalongkorn University on the eve of the coup four years ago. He was among 10 or so people who violated martial law by holding the first public protest to denounce the coup-makers in front of Siam Centre on the afternoon of September 21, 2006. "The situation is gradually getting worse," Kengkij said, referring to the state of Thai democracy and political freedom now.

"The space for political freedom is getting narrower. [Opposition] websites have been blocked or shut [with Opposition] papers threatened. The fight [against autocratic rule] has increased since the coup. However, the elite now think they must exert greater control beyond introducing the [junta-sponsored] 2007 charter."

Kengkij feared a class war may be looming.

The three activists were all asked if the military had become even more powerful four years after the coup. All said yes.

"The military has become the main mechanism in the elite exercising power. This can be seen from the stark defence budget increase," Kengkij said. "The issue over Preah Vihear, for example, could actually be about increasing the military budget."

Sirote agreed that the boost in the defence budget suggested the Army's influence had grown. He said there were more places for generals now. "We have more generals than we really need. The budget increase is also increasing at an unusual rate."

Chotisak thought the rising power of the military was often not seen by the public but said it could be recognised by how considerate elected governments were to the military.

"Before September 19, [2006], the threat of a coup was almost like a joke and not taken seriously, but the threat has since become scary," he said.

Reflecting on the lessons for Thai politics in the four years since the coup, Chotisak said people should think harder about ways to solve a crisis, as military solutions could ended up creating newer problems. He said the violent crackdown in April and May would only make people more politically bitter and aware of the real political problems the Kingdom faces.

Sirote hoped that a fight to ensure freedom of political expression may make a difference in how Thailand handles the current crisis. People should also recognise that resorting to force to try to solve a conflict, such as by staging a coup in 2006 or the bloody crackdown in April and May, would not solve problems.

To Kengkij, Thais should try to look at the bigger picture, beyond the past four to five years of political conflict and imagine how they would like future political regimes to be.

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2010-09-19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If political protests didn't involve protesters shooting guns and grenades or burning down buildings, there would be more political freedom.

And no matter how many people say it, these protests are not class related. There are plenty of poor people that support the current government, and plenty of rich people who support the opposition.

People should also recognise that resorting to force to try to solve a conflict, such as by staging a coup in 2006 or the bloody crackdown in April and May, would not solve problems.

... and such as shooting guns and grenades at army and civilians.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Some former activists who opposed the 2006 military coup - four years ago today - said Thai society under the Abhisit Vejjajiva administration enjoys less democratic freedom than after the military junta ousted Thaksin Shinawatra."

In the professional arenas that I haunt, it is common practice when presenting a problem, to have a proposed solution in hand and to be prepared to present and defend the solution.

Why is it that most of the world's political circles, including Thailand, are noticeably absent of these things? Activists whinging in the press does nothing. Activists establishing principles, sticking to them, and building large scale grass roots support to strengthen them, is what creates and stabilizes large and lasting change.

Both sides in Thailand are so fundamentally flawed, it is going to take something more, and another drab boring news article ain't it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If political protests didn't involve protesters shooting guns and grenades or burning down buildings, there would be more political freedom.

And no matter how many people say it, these protests are not class related. There are plenty of poor people that support the current government, and plenty of rich people who support the opposition.

People should also recognise that resorting to force to try to solve a conflict, such as by staging a coup in 2006 or the bloody crackdown in April and May, would not solve problems.

... and such as shooting guns and grenades at army and civilians.

Well said 'whybother". The violence that erupted never would have begun had the Red Shirt rally not started. Everyone was well subdued until they continued and forced the issue - this one finger points out and three face the accusers of the Red Shirts. Bombs, guns, grenades - not very peaceful items to put across you point of view.

But the rhetoric of this article is about freedom and perhaps the writer should recall the crack down by Thaksin, closing a TV station and the slaughter of (numbers unknown) people in the North and South of Thailand and the media blackouts - what short memories some journalists have. Thailand is far more free now and the only strangulation is against those inciting riot and protest. I am all for it!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If political protests didn't involve protesters shooting guns and grenades or burning down buildings, there would be more political freedom.

And no matter how many people say it, these protests are not class related. There are plenty of poor people that support the current government, and plenty of rich people who support the opposition.

People should also recognise that resorting to force to try to solve a conflict, such as by staging a coup in 2006 or the bloody crackdown in April and May, would not solve problems.

... and such as shooting guns and grenades at army and civilians.

it is pretty clear that no one governs the country without the army's go ahead but what we going to do. take on the army. TIT. Not 100 per cent happy about the situation but i was to give Abbisist a chance. i have paid allot more tax since he has been in power. now i want to know how it is spent. i mean 15 baht for the new sky train from the air port to paya thai is not bad. The roads in samui are getting more funding. So i have paid into the country. Now i want to see what he puts back in. Then i make up my minde on if he is good or not.

:jap:

i mean u only have to drive to Kon kean and Udon thani and big cities in the north. They are very nice compared to the cities in the south. I wonder who the previous govement sorted out first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly it was well before the coup and unde a democratically elected government that Thailands biggest recent massacre took place. Sadly so few spoke up against that when there was supposedly the freedom to do so and now it remains conveniently forgotten even by activists who claim to be democracy advocates. That is a sad state of affairs and shows Thailand has a long way to go with no current poltiicans, activists etc being any more than serving vested interests. When will the country actually have movements that condemn all abuses and noit just the ones their side wants? Until that time there is no movement worth supporting and no activist worth describing as such

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...