Jump to content

Samsung Refutes Apple's Patent Infringement Claims


webfact

Recommended Posts

Samsung refutes Apple's patent infringement claims

SEOUL, Aug. 12 (Yonhap) -- Samsung Electronics Co. refuted rival electronics maker Apple Inc.'s accusations that the South Korean tech giant copied its iconic iPhone handset in a pre-trial hearing on Friday.

The U.S.-based electronics maker filed a lawsuit with a Seoul court against Samsung in June to block the company from selling the Galaxy line of touch-screen smartphones and tablet PCs, which Apple said copied its best-selling iPhone 3 model.

In the hearing held at the Seoul Central District Court, Samsung Electronics dismissed the originality of the iPhone's design and operating functions.

It also said the technologies Apple claims under its patent rights in fact incorporate contributions by several IT companies.

"The technology sector, which Apple said belongs to its patented rights, actually belongs to a number of intermediary entities who contributed to the development," Samsung's legal representative said in reference to similar technologies that both firms utilized to operate their touch-screen gadgets.

"Apple's argument that its products represent originality and advancement has a fundamental deficiency," the Samsung representative said, suggesting that Apple's patented technologies are the result of collaboration among various developers in the touch-screen and electronics sectors.

"Apple is leading the suit unreasonably in how it has tried to privatize the public domain and exaggerated its rights," the Samsung representative said.

The local firm's defense came as Apple reiterated on Friday its claims raised in its June court complaint that Samsung Electronics' Galaxy S and Galaxy S II smartphones and the Galaxy Tab tablet PC look very similar to its iPhone in design and user interface.

"There is a high possibility that (consumers) could get confused by the two firms' products as the imitation of on-screen icons, appearance and packaging was explicit and comprehensive," said an Apple representative.

He reiterated Apple's previous request that the court order Samsung Electronics to stop producing and selling the Galaxy series.

Their first official court hearing is set for Sept. 23.

Apple's legal action in June came as competition escalated between the two companies for bigger shares of the increasingly popular smartphone market. Apple had filed similar lawsuits against Samsung in the United States in April.

Samsung Electronics had countered by filing similar lawsuits against Apple in the U.S., South Korea, Japan and Germany, arguing that the U.S. firm copied 10 of its patents to make the iPhone. (Yonhap)

tnalogo.jpg

-- TNA 2011-08-12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AAPL just passed ExxonMobile as the World's most valuable company. They've also been through a down-turn before so seem prepared to defend their turf through any/all means. As a shareholder I can say I am pleased, perhaps giddy. But they should realize that if they want 70%+ market share for tablets they'll incur the wrath of EU and USA anti-monopoly forces. This maybe more about hobbling the competition by getting royalties which keep MSRP's high and protect the iPads from any price/margin erosion.

I'm not a IP/patent attorney but I think Apple's contentions re: form-factors and basic UI functionality on portable devices are proprietary/protected are ludicrous. How is one expected to manipulate a smaller display except by using their fingers? :whistling:

For Samsung specifically, they are/were a sole-supplier of many key iPhone/iPad components so there is a fair amount of jockeying going on that front as well. AAPL's costs are rising a bit as they have to seek alternative suppliers, and their MSRP is more or less fixed with some downward pressure, so they ideally need to maintain high-end smartphone and tablet list prices. By adding costs to competitors products via licensing (paging Qualcomm to the front desk :whistling: ) fees helps.

There is also a lot of movement on the existing patent front. Google recently bought a bunch of patents from IBM, some of which one might expect will be used to battle AAPL on the Android front?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...