Jump to content

Thai Refuses To Vacate Wife'S Property


Recommended Posts

Whoever pays the property taxes is the legal owner of the land, case closed.

Next

Wholly incorrect.

Not incorrect at all, the property tax payment notification will be sent to the address on record. It doesn't have to be the actual location of the land.

The person who pays the tax acknowledges it is their responsibility to pay the tax, if they can show receipts issued for payment.

In a court of law it will stand. The judge will question why the owner on record had not paid it themselves and why the tax bill was being sent where it was.

If you feel it is wholly incorrect please explain why. I know of more than one case where this has been the deciding factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever pays the property taxes is the legal owner of the land, case closed.

Next

Wholly incorrect.

Not incorrect at all, the property tax payment notification will be sent to the address on record. It doesn't have to be the actual location of the land.

The person who pays the tax acknowledges it is their responsibility to pay the tax, if they can show receipts issued for payment.

In a court of law it will stand. The judge will question why the owner on record had not paid it themselves and why the tax bill was being sent where it was.

If you feel it is wholly incorrect please explain why. I know of more than one case where this has been the deciding factor.

More than one case? decisively the sole criterion then ;)

We can therefore dispense with the land code, land offices, chanotes (and lesser titles), squatters rights, competing ownership claims et al and just rely on tax receipts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever pays the property taxes is the legal owner of the land, case closed.

Next

Wholly incorrect.

Not incorrect at all, the property tax payment notification will be sent to the address on record. It doesn't have to be the actual location of the land.

The person who pays the tax acknowledges it is their responsibility to pay the tax, if they can show receipts issued for payment.

In a court of law it will stand. The judge will question why the owner on record had not paid it themselves and why the tax bill was being sent where it was.

If you feel it is wholly incorrect please explain why. I know of more than one case where this has been the deciding factor.

More than one case? decisively the sole criterion then wink.png

We can therefore dispense with the land code, land offices, chanotes (and lesser titles), squatters rights, competing ownership claims et al and just rely on tax receipts?

in this case, you got it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wife has been informed that squatter will not leave under any circumstances. even if he were paid hundreds of thousands of baht. He insists my wife cannot get him out.

This has me worried and I have advised my wife to get a lawyer immediately.

Not sure who has paid last two years property tax but have urged my wife to pay it asap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...