You're making another very large jump from "Trump wants stricter election rules" to "Trump's ultimate goal is to suppress the vote and eventually cancel elections." Yes, Trump wants voter ID, documentary proof of citizenship, cleaner voter rolls and tighter rules for mail-in ballots. That's not a secret. He's openly advocating for those things. But requiring someone to prove they're eligible to vote isn't the same thing as preventing an eligible citizen from voting. If a voter-ID requirement is written in a way that makes it unreasonably difficult for legitimate voters to comply, then challenge that specific requirement. If polling places are deliberately closed to prevent certain legitimate voters from voting, show the evidence and challenge it. If Trump actually tries to cancel an election, I'll oppose that too. But you can't simply declare that every election-integrity measure is "voter suppression" and then use that assumption as proof that Trump's ultimate plan is to cancel elections. You also say Trump "knows 2020 is over and done." How exactly do you know what Trump privately believes? I think Biden legitimately won the 2020 election. I also think Trump continues to believe, rightly or wrongly, that there were serious problems with that election. Those are two separate questions. And Trump's "find 11,780 votes" call doesn't automatically prove criminal election fraud either. If he had said, "create 11,780 fake votes because I know I lost," that would be an entirely different matter. He was claiming votes existed that Georgia officials told him did not exist. He was wrong, and Georgia's recounts confirmed Biden won. Being wrong about the existence of fraudulent votes and knowingly manufacturing fraudulent votes are not the same thing. Most importantly, where is the evidence for your biggest accusation: that Trump's "ultimate goal" is not to have elections at all? You went from voter ID and proof of citizenship to voter suppression to Trump eventually canceling elections. That's a conclusion you've reached, not evidence that Trump has actually developed such a plan. I'm perfectly willing to criticize something Trump actually does. But I'm not going to condemn him for something somebody predicts he might eventually do and then treat that prediction as established fact.
