Jump to content

Smog In Thailand's North 'To Get Worse'


webfact

Recommended Posts

HAZE

Smog in North 'to get worse'

The Nation

30177343-01_big.jpg

BANGKOK: -- A researcher warned residents in the North yesterday to brace for worse air pollution, saying the smog problem was set to deteriorate.

"Local farmers will light more fires to clear land in forest zones for their upcoming farming season. There's lot of stuff to burn this year because the forestland last year was too damp for them to light fires," Chiang Mai University lecturer Dr Suthinee Dontree said.

Suthinee has conducted research on how to prevent forest fires in Chiang Mai under a project jointly supported by the university's Public Policy Studies Institute and the Thai Health Promotion Foundation.

"I believe the smog situation this year will be as severe as that seen in 2007 and 2010," she said.

In those years, the amount of tiny dust particles known as PM10 was three times higher than what was considered safe. According to the Pollution Control Department (PCD), each cubic metre of air should contain no more than 120 micrograms of PM10 particles for safety reasons.

Suthinee said 40 per cent of land in Chiang Mai's nine districts was cleared by fire in those years. The districts were Mae Chaem, Hot, Chiang Dao, Om Koi, Chom Thong, Doi Tao, Fang, Mae Ai and Chai Prakan.

She said relevant authorities should tackle the smog problem by designating certain hours of the day for fires in each area to stop locals lighting fires at the same time and seriously worsening air quality.

"However, in the long run, locals should receive help to find other work. If they find something that can give |them more income than mobile farms, they will stop lighting fires in forest zones."

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2012-03-06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have rural parcels in Chiang Rai. The air got a bit better on Sunday. It was still bad, but you at least could discern between cloud and sky, and there were a few stars seen in the night sky. I have a dozen brush piles ready to burn but I won't light them now. The brush piles consist mainly of dead tree branches (some with parasitic growths) and cut weeds. For those with rural properties, it's constant battles to keep the weeds from taking over. I appreciate that composting and chipping would be preferable, but such things are not practical, particularly on a large scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i guess they will wait to do anything until a good 100 people or more would instantly die in some fires ?

it is all over thailand, so asshol_e that burns his trash and most likely trash of a whole moo bahn in some desolate place and give everybody a nice dose of free lung cancer

pollution control in thailand, hello police ? to hard to find the fire ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very very bad, eyes burning,slime in throat,coughing up flem,can't breathe properly,not good at all, needs a solution from some where.....but where? burning still going on around here, can't approach anyone to tell them to stop or they will probably kill you, oh dear...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seriously considered moving - myself and my company - to the North. Was to travel their last month to find property in Chiang Rai - but decided to wait and see how the 'smoky season' would be this year, after last year's relatively mild pollution. I have changed my mind and will not move to the North. I might as well move to my least favourite part of Thailand, greater Bangkok, another serious health risk in itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have rural parcels in Chiang Rai. The air got a bit better on Sunday. It was still bad, but you at least could discern between cloud and sky, and there were a few stars seen in the night sky. I have a dozen brush piles ready to burn but I won't light them now. The brush piles consist mainly of dead tree branches (some with parasitic growths) and cut weeds. For those with rural properties, it's constant battles to keep the weeds from taking over. I appreciate that composting and chipping would be preferable, but such things are not practical, particularly on a large scale.

I totally agree . That's one of the reasons. - But the actual situation might largely be the result of illegal slash and burn in or near protected areas. Have a look at a map: http://firefly.geog....=5&i=er&l=ad,ct

And back to the OP: 'However, in the long run, locals should receive help to find other work. If they find something that can give them more income than mobile farms, they will stop lighting fires in forest zones.' - Please notice 'mobile farms'.

So in the meantime there will be a lot smoke over Indochina.

post-78175-0-11065400-1331001297_thumb.p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Farming is one of the most devastating practices for the environment. Cutting down trees, burning land, breeding methane breathing cows, diverting water for agricultural use and hence drying up rivers are some crimes of agriculture. Not to mention torturing of countless animals and in the end slaughtering them that some could claim is "not environmentally unfriendly". There has to be some new awareness and effective policies introduced, aimed at curbing agriculture, for the world to survive in this and the next century. Otherwise mother nature is going to adjust human population in similar way as it's done with the dinosaurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i for one ain't going north of bangkok any time soon, no thanks Mr. Cancer

And Bangkok is full of healthy air is it?

Perhaps a matter of degree. I just got back from a few days in Bangkok. I did a lot of walking and had no problems breathing or burning eyes. This morning going to work and you could cut the smog with a knife, my eyes are burning even now and when I stepped out of my car at work I could smell the smoke. Rather found Bangkok a breath of fresh air so to speak over Chiang Mai. wink.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no other way for those farmers to clear their lands for the next crops ? they dont think about others ? apparently not .

Well, any other method would be enormously expensive and less effective which would cause a huge increase in crop prices, both in the food shops in Thailand and for export. The Thai economy is based on cheap farming (40%) and much less on tourism (6%) so without practices such as burning off the land, Thailand would be much less economically competitive and this would lead to an increase in unemployment, reduced investment and a poorer economy. It's not a simple case of the farmers not thinking about others, it's more about no-one coming up with a better method for the farmers, who also suffer respiratory diseases, to use instead.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i for one ain't going north of bangkok any time soon, no thanks Mr. Cancer

And Bangkok is full of healthy air is it?

Perhaps a matter of degree. I just got back from a few days in Bangkok. I did a lot of walking and had no problems breathing or burning eyes. This morning going to work and you could cut the smog with a knife, my eyes are burning even now and when I stepped out of my car at work I could smell the smoke. Rather found Bangkok a breath of fresh air so to speak over Chiang Mai. wink.png

Yeah, Bangkok is now the Garden of Thailand! CM is it's smokehouse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have rural parcels in Chiang Rai. The air got a bit better on Sunday. It was still bad, but you at least could discern between cloud and sky, and there were a few stars seen in the night sky. I have a dozen brush piles ready to burn but I won't light them now. The brush piles consist mainly of dead tree branches (some with parasitic growths) and cut weeds. For those with rural properties, it's constant battles to keep the weeds from taking over. I appreciate that composting and chipping would be preferable, but such things are not practical, particularly on a large scale.

Not practical? Hmmmmm.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seriously considered moving - myself and my company - to the North. Was to travel their last month to find property in Chiang Rai - but decided to wait and see how the 'smoky season' would be this year, after last year's relatively mild pollution. I have changed my mind and will not move to the North. I might as well move to my least favourite part of Thailand, greater Bangkok, another serious health risk in itself.

Good Choice. Chiangmai sucks! All Yr. long. Please tell everyone you know!

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no other way for those farmers to clear their lands for the next crops ? they dont think about others ? apparently not .

Not to be rude but they actually do think of others more than others think of them.

They do provide food for such cheap prices I sure wouldn't do it.

But more importantly when I stay way up north in farmland I see they just do not have any equipment period.

Except for that wimpy tiller they use at rice time...

Nor will they soon afford any.

Then to top it off have you seen many of their farms? For the most part It is not a storybook farm of flat acres that stretch forever

In some areas it is radical hills planted in Corn or beans or what ever is the crop for that time of year.

Even if they somehow could afford machines I know of none that could work those steep grades.

I swear I am shocked when I see them harvesting corn by hand on those steep hills.

Yes the smoke sucks & is bad for all. But I do not see them becoming rich anytime soon to the point of

abandoning the hills & buying flat lands & machinery

Here are some pics but they do not really show just how steep it is....

post-51988-0-52659400-1331011021_thumb.j

post-51988-0-27632100-1331011025_thumb.j

Edited by flying
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Farming is one of the most devastating practices for the environment. Cutting down trees, burning land, breeding methane breathing cows, diverting water for agricultural use and hence drying up rivers are some crimes of agriculture. Not to mention torturing of countless animals and in the end slaughtering them that some could claim is "not environmentally unfriendly". There has to be some new awareness and effective policies introduced, aimed at curbing agriculture, for the world to survive in this and the next century. Otherwise mother nature is going to adjust human population in similar way as it's done with the dinosaurs.

Agriculture feeds people my friend and as I would agree the misuse of land for raising livestock is extremely devastating, but growing food to feed people is a no brainer. Burn and Slash is just as bad as raising livestock for food. There are other choices ( but not many).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no other way for those farmers to clear their lands for the next crops ? they dont think about others ? apparently not .

Well, any other method would be enormously expensive and less effective which would cause a huge increase in crop prices, both in the food shops in Thailand and for export. The Thai economy is based on cheap farming (40%) and much less on tourism (6%) so without practices such as burning off the land, Thailand would be much less economically competitive and this would lead to an increase in unemployment, reduced investment and a poorer economy. It's not a simple case of the farmers not thinking about others, it's more about no-one coming up with a better method for the farmers, who also suffer respiratory diseases, to use instead.

Well, they could always just plough it back into the soil. They do use tractors, you know. Even after they've burnt the straw, much of stubble remains, & gets ploughed in, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In support of flying’s post, much of the mountainous farmland is inaccessible to heavy machinery and when they are finished harvesting they are left with mountains of stuff they don’t know what to do with. So it goes up in flame and we breath the results. These practices are so widespread, punitive measures just can’t be enforced.

You’re not going to make much headway telling people to stop making a living or feeding their families. I think it will take another generation or two to see much change. The following pictures show areas near Pha Tang, Phu Che Fa, Mae Chaem and my own back yard.

Bike%2520Ride%2520%2520001.jpg

Trails%2520%2520007.jpg

Burning%2520%2520002.jpg

Fire%2520%2520002.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why the powers that be don't enact the law and jail offenders for lighting fires!

There are laws on the books. But the enforcement of the laws is the problem.

There aren’t enough cops or jail cells. In the countryside everyone does it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Northerners are nice people, but they're pyromaniacs, burning everything everywhere. While escaping Chiang Rai in 2007, I surveyed the damage going south, and the burning and smoke stop abruptly at the line separating central Thailand from the north, even detouring around Sukothai along a line from P'lok to Tak. Licenses and fines would work if enforced I imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it really that difficult to try to coordinate the burns so they don't all burn at once?

I know they are uneducated farmers, but come on. In the 1000+ years they have been burning, have they not thought that there is too much smoke if everyone burns at the same time?

There is a certain kind of ignorance found in South East Asia that is indescribable to someone who doesn't live here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...