Jump to content

There's 'No Climate For Reconciliation In Thailand'


Recommended Posts

Posted

There's 'no climate for reconciliation'

Pravit Rojanaphruk

The Nation

30178147-01_big.jpg

BANGKOK: -- Despite so much talk about the need to achieve national reconciliation, Thailand still needs to create a climate for understanding, Wutisarn Tanchai, King Prajadhipok's Institute (KPI) deputy secretary-general, said.

Wutisarn, who led the study on "sustainable reconciliation", said compromise was tough, because both camps were seeking to defeat one another.

The study, commissioned by the parliamentary subcommittee on national reconciliation, concludes that there is a need to not just discuss the legal and judicial aspects of the conflict, but also to discuss its root causes, including a "reflection on power relations in Thai society".

The researchers said they do not support discussion about the role of the monarchy and politics over the past 50 years, though they are urging people to stop posting defamatory remarks online. They also do not recommend granting amnesty to those charged under the lese majeste law.

Wutisarn said the other recommendations were comprehensive and that the government should accept them as a package if they are committed to working toward reconciliation.

The report included four short-term solutions: finding out the truth about the past; granting amnesty to protesters; restoring confidence in the judicial process, particularly in relation to cases initiated by the junta-appointed Asset Examination Committee against Thaksin Shinawatra; and finding common rules to be agreed upon by all parties. The report also cited two long-term issues that need public debate - a future Thai "democratic" regime with His Majesty as head of state and laying the foundations for social justice.

"We can avoid dealing with the truth [about the April-May 2010 crackdown]," he said, adding that it was debatable as to when and how much information should be released to the public and even researchers do not have a recommended position on that. Besides, issues like this take a long time to resolve even in other countries, he said.

He urged people to "abandon the idea" of punishing the 2006 coup-makers and also slammed the media for providing one-sided information, which he says is only fanning hatred and exacerbating the political rift.

Meanwhile, Methas Anuwat-udom, a member of the research team, warned that it would be dangerous for society if people did not have the space to express their political dissatisfaction.

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2012-03-17

Posted
"We can avoid dealing with the truth [about the April-May 2010 crackdown]," he said, adding that it was debatable as to when and how much information should be released to the public and even researchers do not have a recommended position on that. Besides, issues like this take a long time to resolve even in other countries, he said.

I do hope this is yet another typo from The Nation and he really didn't say that.

Posted

Those who do not learn the lessons of History are condemned to repeat the mistakes. The French revolution was the first and is still highly relevant to Thai progress towards democracy. I fear that only a violent revolution in this country will eventually provide the answer to these entrenched positions. It is easily avoidable but the Redshirts are ill educated and the yellow shirts will fight to preserve their percieved status and privilege.

Posted

Those who do not learn the lessons of History are condemned to repeat the mistakes. The French revolution was the first and is still highly relevant to Thai progress towards democracy. I fear that only a violent revolution in this country will eventually provide the answer to these entrenched positions. It is easily avoidable but the Redshirts are ill educated and the yellow shirts will fight to preserve their percieved status and privilege.

and those who do not understand history at all are liable to make trite remarks.

  • Like 1
Posted

Quote

"The report included four short-term solutions: finding out the truth about the past; granting amnesty to protesters; restoring confidence in the judicial process, particularly in relation to cases initiated by the junta-appointed Asset Examination Committee against Thaksin Shinawatra; and finding common rules to be agreed upon by all parties"

So granting amnisty to protestors who were convicted of other crimes there is no law against honest protesting will restore confidence in the judicial process.

I could be wrong but it looks to me like it will just make the judicial system a joke.

As for common rules to be agreed on by all parties they already have them. The problem is Thaksin wrote them and not every one is on his pay roll.

Posted (edited)

There will be no sustainable reconciliation until the law is being upheld. The fugitive, redshirts and yellowshirts must do the time for their crimes.

The law has to be respected by all, including politicians.

Edited by bigbamboo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...