Trying To Stop The Rot In Thailand's Schools By Giving Out Tablet Computers
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
-
Latest posts...
-
103
Trump promised 200 trade deals. He’s made 3
As if it would have been possible to avoid globalisation... -
36
Transport Thailand Tightens Grip on Ride-Hailing with Tough New Rules
What ever it is they will charge for it with each ride but will not comply -
456
Will there ever be a safe vaccine?
Link ? where exactly has the BBC issued an internal directive in 2020 stating: "Do not hold debate with any anti-COVID people, whether they are right or not"? I suspect you're conflating that with their editorial policy to avoid amplifying claims that lack sufficient evidence or credibility. Do you also believe mainstream media should give serious airtime to Flat Earthers, people who deny the existence of pathogenic viruses, or those who claim antibiotics are unnecessary because “nature has the answer”? There's a reason such views aren't given equal platform: they aren't grounded in credible science. Let’s be honest - even most of your fellow anti-vax posters on this forum don’t agree with you that pathogenic viruses don’t exist. There’s a difference between questioning COVID-19 vaccines and rejecting the fundamentals of microbiology and virology. And even within your own circles, you’re often seen as occupying the farthest fringes of anti-scientific thought - so far out, in fact, that you don’t even get support from like-minded sceptics. Meanwhile, there are legitimate grey areas, such as the long-term implications of mRNA vaccines, where serious, independent research is not only warranted but essential. And yes, such studies should be completely free from bias - this is where scientific scrutiny belongs. However, as has already been noted, if these studies ultimately contradict the anti-vaccination narrative, they will simply be dismissed. You won't pause, reflect, or reconsider - you'll pivot to claiming further conspiracy. Or, worse still, if one adverse event in 100,000 doses results in something like VITT, you'll call that a vindication - declaring vaccines dangerous while wilfully ignoring the overwhelmingly positive impact on public health at large. And this, yet again, is precisely why I refuse to be drawn into these kinds of debates with you (specifically). Engaging with such a fundamentally flawed outlook is utterly draining. You seize upon a fragment of fact, twist and conflate it to suit your narrative, and in response, one is forced to craft a detailed, evidence-based reply - complete with sources, data, and nuance. And yet, it’s all summarily ignored as you simply pile on with more threads, more misinformation, all designed to drown out the facts within the comfort of your own echo chamber. -
41
USA immigration and customs enforcement ,protecting the homeland…News
Whatever happened in the days before illegal workers who pick crops at semi-slave wages? How do OTHER countries manage to have funcitoning economies without the need for a permanent underclass of virtual indentured servants? Fact is that the majority of workers in EVERY field of employment, including agriculture, are American citizens or legal residents. Pay enough, and give incentives for people to work, and they will come.- 1
-
-
103
Trump promised 200 trade deals. He’s made 3
NAFTA was but a symptom of rampant globalism and exporting US jobs, factories and manufacturing. Perot knew that. -
7
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now