That would fine if it was "easily accessible information on the internet". Since no one seems to be able to find reference to it, I think "the Tlansford feint" is more appropriate.

Sent from my shoe phone

it's on the wikipedia page for god sake

"The PAD seizure of Don Muang and Suvarnabhumi Airports is estimated to have cost the Thai economy at least three billion Baht (approximately US$100 million) a day in lost shipment value and opportunities"

sourced from the other paper.

See. That wasn't so hard, was it? Tom seems to have a problem providing a source for his statements, hence the "the tlansford feint".

Sent from my shoe phone

that wasn't so hard?!

am i hallucinating or did i not just quote you saying "Since no one seems to be able to find reference to it, I think "the Tlansford feint" is more appropriate"

now you're trying to spin it as you proving to me that it wasn't hard to find!

funny.

That would fine if it was "easily accessible information on the internet".

i believe what i just did, is prove you wrong.

can't any of ye ever just accept it when it happens...

Edited June 30, 201214 yr by nurofiend

that wasn't so hard?!

am i hallucinating or did i not just quote you saying "Since no one seems to be able to find reference to it, I think "the Tlansford feint" is more appropriate"

now you're trying to spin it as you proving to me that it wasn't hard to find!

funny.

That would fine if it was "easily accessible information on the internet".

i believe what i just did, is prove you wrong.

can't any of ye ever just accept it when it happens...

The original statement was in reference to Tom not providing a reference to his statement that the first killed on April 10 was a red shirt.

You saying "it's on the internet" just reflected Tom's statement.

Sent from my shoe phone

Frankly speaking, is there anyone here who still believes a single word coming out of Mark's mouth ?

I think, of the two options on the table today, Abhisit or Yingluck, Abhisit is the best option by around 1000%. And I believe him. No reason not to anyway.

He could have done better as PM, but in compare with Thaksin and Yingluck he is not 1000, but 10000% better.

He could have made a difference in Thailand if he hadn't had to fight the Militarized arm of the PT. Also having to appease 40 of his supporters who were Thaksin trained didn't help.

that wasn't so hard?!

am i hallucinating or did i not just quote you saying "Since no one seems to be able to find reference to it, I think "the Tlansford feint" is more appropriate"

now you're trying to spin it as you proving to me that it wasn't hard to find!

funny.

That would fine if it was "easily accessible information on the internet".

i believe what i just did, is prove you wrong.

can't any of ye ever just accept it when it happens...

The original statement was in reference to Tom not providing a reference to his statement that the first killed on April 10 was a red shirt.

You saying "it's on the internet" just reflected Tom's statement.

Sent from my shoe phone

it doesn't matter what it 'reflected'!

it was a completely different conversation on a different issue.

and you specifically said "That would fine if it was "easily accessible information on the internet". Since no one seems to be able to find reference to it, I think "the Tlansford feint" is more appropriate." when directly quoting me arguing that what moruya asked for was simple to find for oneself.