Jump to content

Counting The Cost Of Populism: Thailand


Recommended Posts

Posted

Counting the cost of populism

BUSINESS REPORTERS

THE NATION

30189062-01_big.JPG

BANGKOK: -- As the Yingluck administration geared up for nationwide events this weekend to mark its first year in office, critics yesterday expressed concern that the government's populist policies would harm society and increase public debt.

Car manufacturers are planning to show off models eligible for the government's "first-car scheme", while state banks are going to offer loans at the government expo, which will be staged all over the country.

Deputy Finance Minister Tanusak Lekuthai yesterday said Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra would today open the government expo at the Rajamangala National Stadium. Other provinces will hold similar events today and tomorrow.

Tanusak said 12 carmarkers would open booths at the events, allowing visitors to place orders for vehicles that are eligible for tax breaks under the first-car scheme. State-run banks would also offer car hire-purchase loans, first-home mortgages and other financing. Other state agencies will also join the expo.

At the event, the government will highlight 11 projects and several financial schemes including the rice-pledging scheme, crop insurance, credit cards for farmers, debt suspension, universal healthcare, SML fund, village fund, women's development fund and other micro-credit schemes for low-income people, he said.

"The government wants to inform people nationwide about its policies and the many forms of credit that they can access, " Tanusak said.

He rejected criticism over the high possibility that taxpayers stand to lose hundreds of billions of baht from the rice-pledging scheme, saying farm-product prices are rising due to global drought conditions. "I think next year rice prices will increase, as India cannot currently deliver rice orders," he said.

The deputy minister said the cost of the first-car scheme would not be much over the Bt30 billion forecast previously, adding that each buyer can get tax refunds of up to Bt100,000. Car sales under the scheme may exceed 500,000 now that the government had recently relaxed some conditions, he said.

Since car owners must own a car for one year before they can ask for a tax refund, the cost in forgone revenue to the government will be absorbed gradually over a period of years, not in one go, he said. He defended other populist policies as a way to boost the economy and improve living standards.

Praipol Koomsup, professor of economics at Thammasat University, said that while they may have some positive effects on the economy, most of the government's policies tended to be extremely populist in nature.

INFLATED PRICES

He said that most economists do not agree with the rice-pledging scheme, in which the government buys rice from farmers at prices higher than the market prices.

"The loss of taxpayers' money may not be important as much what we get from expensive policy(?),This scheme will not strengthen farmers - they will ask for help again and again," Praipol said.

He said rice prices might not increase in the same way that corn prices have risen in the United States, because the two products' markets work differently.

The first-car scheme was a mistake, Praipol said, because there are already too few roads for the existing number of cars. More vehicles would result in more traffic jams in Bangkok and big cities, he said. "It would be better if the government could save money and then allocate such funds to finance the railway or mass-transit system."

If the government spends large sums on things that deliver returns to the country, that's great, Praipol said. But these populist policies will likely pile up public debts, as the government plans to invest another Bt350 billion in a flood-prevention system. This raises the prospect of real problems of high public debt in the future, he warned.

Sophon Pornchokchai, president of the Agency for Real Estate Affairs, said that almost one year after the first-home scheme's implementation, only Bt4 billion had been lent by the Government Housing Bank, against a target of Bt20 billion. The scheme offers a zero-per-cent interest rate for three years on homes priced not over Bt1 million. Some have suggested increasing the maximum home price to Bt3 million, but Sophon said it is not necessary for the state to intervene at all, as the real estate market functions very well. Banks also compete with each other to offer the best mortgage rate, he said. "The government should save money for other development purposes."

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2012-08-25

Posted

"Since car owners must own a car for one year before they can ask for a tax refund, the cost in forgone revenue to the government will be absorbed gradually over a period of years, not in one go, he said. He defended other populist policies as a way to boost the economy and improve living standards."

wah? blink.png

A one year scheme with a one year wait spreads the cost over many years?

Posted

Counting the cost of populism

I thought they already did that before or shortly after the election. The cost was somewhere in the neighborhood of 2 trillion Baht.

Posted

A one year scheme with a one year wait spreads the cost over many years?

I think he meant that it feels like many years.

.. and ... they will cream fuel tax in the interim by having more cars on the road, which in turn offsets the outgoing. It's still a stupid move and simply a vote buying scam. But the taxes derived (VAT, Withholding taxes, excise and fuel taxes) from everything fro the sale of the vehicle, the insurance etc - means it is not going to be much really. A bit like banks and Wall Street flogging derivatives.

Posted

Instead of this article being titled Counting the Cost of Popularism shouldn't it be titled Counting the Cost of Buying Votes?

Posted

Counting the cost of populism

I thought they already did that before or shortly after the election. The cost was somewhere in the neighborhood of 2 trillion Baht.

Whom in the Government can actually count.rolleyes.gif
Posted

Counting the cost of populism

I thought they already did that before or shortly after the election. The cost was somewhere in the neighborhood of 2 trillion Baht.

Whom in the Government can actually count.rolleyes.gif

Easy answer, only one person counts, in the current administration ! rolleyes.gif

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...