SiameseCurios Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Could Thailand ever have been colonized? This was a question raised on another thread. I didn't want to answer as I didn't want to de-rail the other thread and go off-topic. Another guy, ChiangMaiKelly, thinks NO! What do you think? If yes ............... 1. When? 2. By whom? IMO: yes. And that's a very definite yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrRealDeal Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 I am responsible for colonising 1 house 10 years ago ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaddeus Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Not worth the effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trembly Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Not worth the effort. Not worth the effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaddeus Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Oooh..... I've got a stalker, always wanted one of my very own. I will love him and cuddle him for all eternity, smother him with kisses and affection...... such a warm feeling. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chittychangchang Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Siam Curious are you related to The Pundit or Bodie by any chance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chittychangchang Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Not worth the effort. +1 Brigade, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancealot Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Could a country ever have been been colonized? Exactly how can i read this question? Surely a typo. The day would still have to come when i would post a new thread only in order to fund my credibility from another thread, totally ignoring the new subject matter. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heng Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 It has been colonized, the colonials just don't wave Hua Ren flags around (instead just being content to own and run everything... which is the whole point I believe). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Payboy Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 In the case of Thailand, it was mostly Veni Vidi Veni. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h90 Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 Of course it could have been. But it hasn't been. With enough military power you can colonize everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiangmaikelly Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 Of course it could have been. But it hasn't been. With enough military power you can colonize everything. Afghanistan? Lets see.... Brits, Russians, Americans, Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocN Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 Colonialism is the establishment, exploitation, maintenance, acquisition and expansion of colonies in one territory by people from another territory. It is a process whereby the metropole claims sovereignty over the colony, and the social structure,government, and economics of the colony are changed by colonizers from the metropole. Colonialism is a set of unequal relationships between the metropole and the colony and between the colonists and the indigenous population.[1] By this definition: NO! By logic: Burmese, Japanese... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiangmaikelly Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 Colonialism is the establishment, exploitation, maintenance, acquisition and expansion of colonies in one territory by people from another territory. It is a process whereby the metropole claims sovereignty over the colony, and the social structure,government, and economics of the colony are changed by colonizers from the metropole. Colonialism is a set of unequal relationships between the metropole and the colony and between the colonists and the indigenous population.[1] By this definition: NO! By logic: Burmese, Japanese... So I guess we agree. Have you wondered why the OP has given no reasons for his claim? I think he wanted someone else to do the work for him. He has no reasons of his own that Thailand could have been colonized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocN Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 Colonialism is the establishment, exploitation, maintenance, acquisition and expansion of colonies in one territory by people from another territory. It is a process whereby the metropole claims sovereignty over the colony, and the social structure,government, and economics of the colony are changed by colonizers from the metropole. Colonialism is a set of unequal relationships between the metropole and the colony and between the colonists and the indigenous population.[1] By this definition: NO! By logic: Burmese, Japanese... So I guess we agree. Have you wondered why the OP has given no reasons for his claim? I think he wanted someone else to do the work for him. He has no reasons of his own that Thailand could have been colonized. I honestly don't even understand the question! Could? It either was or wasn't! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcp Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 The Chinese have already done it , open ya peepers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NanLaew Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 Didn't the sexpat's first conquer the place sometime in the 70's? The Chinese have the the place all stitched up and have had for aeons, as noted by others earlier. I think the way that Thai's are taught the history of LOS, they were never, ever colonised and kicked always serious arse. However, I reckon they were stuffed royally by the Burmese and Cambodians several times way, way back and just chose to ignore it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiangmaikelly Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 Didn't the sexpat's first conquer the place sometime in the 70's? The Chinese have the the place all stitched up and have had for aeons, as noted by others earlier. I think the way that Thai's are taught the history of LOS, they were never, ever colonised and kicked always serious arse. However, I reckon they were stuffed royally by the Burmese and Cambodians several times way, way back and just chose to ignore it. I think you gave the OP what he wanted some indiscriminate anti Thai rhetoric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rancid Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 Absurd question, of course it could have been. Is this the same CM Kelly of Stickman fame, had some...interesting posts. The British or French could have, the Japanese if they chose to in WW2 and the US if it had wanted to afterwards. But as another poster said, the Chinese now control Thailand by stealth, via power, money, industry, and influence right now. The Thais seem to be the only ones unaware of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiangmaikelly Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 Absurd question, of course it could have been. Is this the same CM Kelly of Stickman fame, had some...interesting posts. The British or French could have, the Japanese if they chose to in WW2 and the US if it had wanted to afterwards. But as another poster said, the Chinese now control Thailand by stealth, via power, money, industry, and influence right now. The Thais seem to be the only ones unaware of this. I would direct your attention to the British colonies after WW2. And the Americans lack of Success with the Philippines. Point in fact the French had a few problems with their colonies in SEA as I remember. Since Thailand was the only country in the area not colonized while the French and Dutch and British were colonizing everyone else I guess you have to ask the poignant question why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pieandmash Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 If the Burmese and the Vietnamese, both historically martially superior peoples than the Thais could not stop themselves being conquered and colonised what chance would Siam of stood. The only reason it wasn't colonised is it served as a handy buffer state between the British and French. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shot Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 Definetly, maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiangmaikelly Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 If the Burmese and the Vietnamese, both historically martially superior peoples than the Thais could not stop themselves being conquered and colonised what chance would Siam of stood. The only reason it wasn't colonised is it served as a handy buffer state between the British and French. Buffer schmuffer. Look at a map and think about it for a while. If the French or the British or the Dutch could have they would have. French/Thais or British/Thais or Dutch/Thais would have been a buffer too. See the flaw in your arguments is they didn't. Does Laos have a common border with Burma? Do you think China is a buffer state against Russia for the British Empire? Who colonized China? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlesGrady Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 It was colonized by the japanese during WW2 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trembly Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 There's a difference between occupation, invasion and colonisation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiangmaikelly Posted November 24, 2012 Share Posted November 24, 2012 (edited) It was colonized by the japanese during WW2 . Thailand was a willing ally of the Japanese during WW II. A Forgotten Invasion Thailand in Shan State, 1941-45 | Docs for ... The PM of Thailand signed a secret agreement with Japan committing Thai troops to the invasion of Burma. Two weeks later he signed a formal treaty of alliance. His reward from the Japanese was territory ceded to the British in 1909. On Jan 25 the PM of Thailand declared war on the USA and UK. In case you are wondering, no ambassadors don't have the authority to change orders of the Prime Minister and legal government of a country. Edited November 24, 2012 by chiangmaikelly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now