lildragon Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 How many cases do you want Prayuth to reopen? Elite's getting away this kind of thing is an issue close to a lot of Thai people's hearts. It would be a hell of a statement if he went after this murdering brat. Or we could you know just carry on with the status quo and forget the whole thing ever happened 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilSA1 Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 General Prayuth seems to be ignoring some of the glaring inconsistencies in the application of justice in Thailand. Seems that this guy, like some many before him, is just going to walk free. $97,000 to be allowed to escape justice while the elderly couple found picking mushrooms in a national park got 10 years. Justice Thai style.Amazing. This incident happened in September 2012 when the country was under the reign of the PTP. I imagine you voiced your opinion at the time - but did you single out Yingluck specifically? If not, why not?People are agitating for the present government to step down as soon as possible, yet it is also expected that the present government has to take responsibility, and remedial action for all past wrongs and injustices of the previous governments. Get real. Amazing. Blunder in but don't bother reading any of the thread. The whole point is that the current govt IS taking action over events in the past. This case presents an opportunity for them to show that they are even-handed. However I suspect the concept of balance is alien to you. Please don't make incorrect assumptions. I did read the thread. Again I ask, at the time (September 2012) if you voiced an opinion, did you single out Yingluck specifically, as you have General Prayuth ? The concept of balance is very much in my mind, hence my question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jip99 Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 General Prayuth seems to be ignoring some of the glaring inconsistencies in the application of justice in Thailand. Seems that this guy, like some many before him, is just going to walk free. $97,000 to be allowed to escape justice while the elderly couple found picking mushrooms in a national park got 10 years. Justice Thai style.Amazing. This incident happened in September 2012 when the country was under the reign of the PTP. I imagine you voiced your opinion at the time - but did you single out Yingluck specifically? If not, why not?People are agitating for the present government to step down as soon as possible, yet it is also expected that the present government has to take responsibility, and remedial action for all past wrongs and injustices of the previous governments. Get real. Amazing. Blunder in but don't bother reading any of the thread. The whole point is that the current govt IS taking action over events in the past. This case presents an opportunity for them to show that they are even-handed. However I suspect the concept of balance is alien to you. There is a massive game of 'catch up' required. The sh!te trail goes back a long way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaffyDuck Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Amazing. Blunder in but don't bother reading any of the thread. The whole point is that the current govt IS taking action over events in the past. Where? Which cases? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lildragon Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 Their seems to be some "Well it was PTP in power that's why". Do you think this kid would of gone to jail if it was the Dems in power in 2012? Seriously? Therein lies the problem. It doesn't matter who's in charge. The elite can still get away with murder. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 General Prayuth seems to be ignoring some of the glaring inconsistencies in the application of justice in Thailand. Seems that this guy, like some many before him, is just going to walk free. $97,000 to be allowed to escape justice while the elderly couple found picking mushrooms in a national park got 10 years. Justice Thai style.Amazing. This incident happened in September 2012 when the country was under the reign of the PTP. I imagine you voiced your opinion at the time - but did you single out Yingluck specifically? If not, why not?People are agitating for the present government to step down as soon as possible, yet it is also expected that the present government has to take responsibility, and remedial action for all past wrongs and injustices of the previous governments. Get real. Amazing. Blunder in but don't bother reading any of the thread. The whole point is that the current govt IS taking action over events in the past. This case presents an opportunity for them to show that they are even-handed. However I suspect the concept of balance is alien to you. Which case from the past have They reopened? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baa_Mango Posted November 30, 2014 Share Posted November 30, 2014 How come the cocaine charges were swept away? Or I mean what was the explanation? I remember even mainstream media like "BANGKOK POST" was mentioning it in their (ridiculous) articles, yet later on it was buried.. As much as this case bothers me, I am gravely upset about the "BILLY" case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaffyDuck Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 Amazing. Blunder in but don't bother reading any of the thread. The whole point is that the current govt IS taking action over events in the past. This case presents an opportunity for them to show that they are even-handed. However I suspect the concept of balance is alien to you. Which case from the past have They reopened? Yes, PRBKK - which case from the past have they re-opened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chupup Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 Does it bother you if the victim family is happy, very happy with the out of court settlement? The alternative being what ?( take the money or else ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Haggis Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 It's not a case of re-opening any case as they should never have been closed in the first place (if they had been). Which cases to look into first is a better question to pose, and the red bull heir case fits the bill as it sends a clear message to the population that your social status will not keep you from the law and prison!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab4 Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 General Prayuth seems to be ignoring some of the glaring inconsistencies in the application of justice in Thailand. Seems that this guy, like some many before him, is just going to walk free. $97,000 to be allowed to escape justice while the elderly couple found picking mushrooms in a national park got 10 years. Justice Thai style. What does this case have to do with Prayuth? The only connection is symbolic. If Prayuth is serious about dealing with inequality...and he says he is...he would instruct his underlings to deal with this case. As you know, it has caused much angst among Thais , with many feeling that the rich and well connected can get away with anything. Is Prayuth part of the solution to that issue or just another problem? He will never have credibility unless he starts to act without fear or favour. Do you want Prayuth to re-open ALL cases where there has been some injustice? How far do you want him to go back? The only connection is people trying to link Prayuth to everything that is bad in Thailand. Well someone has to take over the "everything bad in Thailand happens because of Thaksin" role.......................................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaffyDuck Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 It's not a case of re-opening any case as they should never have been closed in the first place (if they had been). Yes, yes it is. Since Prayuth didn't close the case originally, and the case *WAS* closed, your objection or statement are invalid. As the fact remains that the cases *WERE* closed, by whomever, the question remains as to "what from the past have been reopened", which is what prbkk claims, and which deserves an answer -- though I have a feeling that none will be forthcoming. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrjohndub Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 It's mind-boggling that they didn't confiscate his passport. Business meeting in Singapore? That's why we have teleconferencing.If they were serious about wanting him to return they could simply cancel his passport and notify the Singapore government. The guy faces the risk of 10 years in prison - or he can stay 15 years out of Thailand and return as a free man. I doubt we will see him back here in the next 15 years. That's my plan. Hope it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banzai99 Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 The poor won't stand up against them because there wouldn't be more soap operas on the life of these tw..s. They'd get shot by the Army is the more likely scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baa_Mango Posted December 1, 2014 Share Posted December 1, 2014 Statute of limitations needs some rethinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now