Two redshirts killed by bullets fired by soldiers: court

[Dap]

Well, the verdicts anyway. NOT real sure about how much evidence is mounting up.

Ya' got a list there philw? maybe you'd like to post it as well

Denial is not just a river in Egypt...

But instead of mounting evidence - well, soon a Mt. Everest of evidence - instead of adapting analyses to reality, many here desperately try to hold on an erroneous narrative they faithfully believed for the past 3 1/2 years. Why should anyone here list the evidence anymore - the evidence was presented in full during the court inquests, and these verdicts were based on that evidence.

But - the earth is flat because it is flat and therefore it has to be flat...

Going tit for tat with you would not only be pointless, it would

also be a waste of my time. It would seem neither of us is about

to concede to the other. Have a good evening

[aussieinthailand]

Why were the soldiers retreating?

If they have concluded that the redshirts were indeed killed by shots fired by soldiers, and they also note that the soldiers were retreating at the time, that would clearly suggest that there were fair grounds for the soldiers to open fire since they were obviously under attack themselves.

Treat these cases the same way that the police treat traffic accidents when farangs are involved; i.e., if you hadn't been there, the accident wouldn't have happened.

If these redshirts had not invaded Bangkok and engaged in peaceful means of making their point, the incidents of 2010 would not have taken place. You reap what you sow....!!

Using your theory,

then if the military backed yellow shirts DID NOT steal the government then " the incidents of 2010 would not have taken place. you reap what you sow...!!"

If you don't like the government of the day then use your vote to change it....!!

[gemini81]

The verdicts and evidence are mounting up.

Unarmed and shot in the back by the RTA.

Well, the verdicts anyway. NOT real sure about how much evidence is mounting up.

Ya' got a list there philw? maybe you'd like to post it as well

A list of mind control from a rice farmer' daughter or sittin' & boozin' with country bums seems the only probable explanation. Why else would some western guy rant and rave about the wonderful behaviour and honesty of this red mob thug group & how they've done nothing wrong?

Edited October 2, 2013 by gemini81

[MikeOboe57]

Why were the soldiers retreating?

If they have concluded that the redshirts were indeed killed by shots fired by soldiers, and they also note that the soldiers were retreating at the time, that would clearly suggest that there were fair grounds for the soldiers to open fire since they were obviously under attack themselves.

Treat these cases the same way that the police treat traffic accidents when farangs are involved; i.e., if you hadn't been there, the accident wouldn't have happened.

If these redshirts had not invaded Bangkok and engaged in peaceful means of making their point, the incidents of 2010 would not have taken place. You reap what you sow....!!

Using your theory,

then if the military backed yellow shirts DID NOT steal the government then " the incidents of 2010 would not have taken place. you reap what you sow...!!"

If you don't like the government of the day then use your vote to change it....!!

So why did your red friends not heed your advice and waited for the next election?

[Rimmer]

Off topic posts about Irish troubles removed

[aussieinthailand]

Why were the soldiers retreating?

If they have concluded that the redshirts were indeed killed by shots fired by soldiers, and they also note that the soldiers were retreating at the time, that would clearly suggest that there were fair grounds for the soldiers to open fire since they were obviously under attack themselves.

Treat these cases the same way that the police treat traffic accidents when farangs are involved; i.e., if you hadn't been there, the accident wouldn't have happened.

If these redshirts had not invaded Bangkok and engaged in peaceful means of making their point, the incidents of 2010 would not have taken place. You reap what you sow....!!

Using your theory,

then if the military backed yellow shirts DID NOT steal the government then " the incidents of 2010 would not have taken place. you reap what you sow...!!"

If you don't like the government of the day then use your vote to change it....!!

So why did your red friends not heed your advice and waited for the next election?

1. there was a very large violent protest NOT a theft of government by the red's and violence used on both sides.

2. and um yeah the people did use the vote to install this government.

next

[whybother]

Why were the soldiers retreating?

If they have concluded that the redshirts were indeed killed by shots fired by soldiers, and they also note that the soldiers were retreating at the time, that would clearly suggest that there were fair grounds for the soldiers to open fire since they were obviously under attack themselves.

Treat these cases the same way that the police treat traffic accidents when farangs are involved; i.e., if you hadn't been there, the accident wouldn't have happened.

If these redshirts had not invaded Bangkok and engaged in peaceful means of making their point, the incidents of 2010 would not have taken place. You reap what you sow....!!

Using your theory,

then if the military backed yellow shirts DID NOT steal the government then " the incidents of 2010 would not have taken place. you reap what you sow...!!"

If you don't like the government of the day then use your vote to change it....!!

When were the yellow shirts in government?

How is being elected PM in parliament "stealing government"?

[roger rederer]

A poster asks who is going to take responsibility for the Red Shirts trashing of Central World? Erm.....I'll type this slowly: They got caught and are banged up in nick. As for the Yellow shirt thugs that closed Thailand down in 2008....................................

Yup "It's all their own fault" for getting shot! What an immature statement.

[MikeOboe57]

Well, the verdicts anyway. NOT real sure about how much evidence is mounting up.

Ya' got a list there philw? maybe you'd like to post it as well

Denial is not just a river in Egypt...

But instead of mounting evidence - well, soon a Mt. Everest of evidence - instead of adapting analyses to reality, many here desperately try to hold on an erroneous narrative they faithfully believed for the past 3 1/2 years. Why should anyone here list the evidence anymore - the evidence was presented in full during the court inquests, and these verdicts were based on that evidence.

But - the earth is flat because it is flat and therefore it has to be flat...

And this Mount Everest of evidence went into labour and gave birth to a little mouse called "The court believes but does not know".

[waza]

A poster asks who is going to take responsibility for the Red Shirts trashing of Central World? Erm.....I'll type this slowly: They got caught and are banged up in nick. As for the Yellow shirt thugs that closed Thailand down in 2008....................................

Yup "It's all their own fault" for getting shot! What an immature statement.

Do some research Roger, no one has been banged up for trashing, looting or burning Central world and all those that were charged have been released due to a lack of evidence. As for the yellow, 80+ yellowshirts have been charged and convicted.