Jump to content

Thai Commerce Ministry asserts full payment to farmers for rice purchases


Recommended Posts

Posted

Commerce Ministry asserts full payment to farmers for rice purchases
By Digital Content

13869953435738.jpg

BANGKOK, Dec 14 – The government is financially capable of paying farmers who sold rice under the subsidy scheme but the delay in payment was due to financial discipline on managing the revolving fund, according to a deputy commerce minister.

Yanyong Phuangrach said the Commerce Ministry has to manage its spending within the allocated revolving fund of Bt500 billion.

The spending limit for the 2013/14 harvest is Bt270 billion, he said.

Mr Yanyong said the Budget Bureau has approved a Bt26.9 billion expense, plus an additional Bt20.176 billion from the Bank of Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC) to purchase rice from farmers.

The Commerce Ministry has another amount of Bt12 billion from sales of packaged rice, contributing to a total Bt60 billion to be paid to farmers by the end of the year, he said.

He said the BAAC and Finance Ministry have created confusion in stating that they would have only Bt26 billion to pay farmers, insisting that the caretaker government is fully authorised to abide by payment obligations under the rice pledging scheme.

“I don’t understand why the BAAC expressed concern on budget constraints for the rice scheme. Any information to the public should not create fear among farmers about payment. The commerce minister has reaffirmed there is sufficient budget for rice purchases nationwide,” said Mr Yanyong.

The Commerce Ministry has so far paid Bt180 billion it earned from rice sales to the BAAC, he said. (MCOT online news)

tnalogo.jpg
-- TNA 2013-12-14

Posted
the delay in payment was due to financial discipline on managing the revolving fund, according to a deputy commerce minister.

Financial discipline as in, we first need to have earned money before we can spend it, but since no sales were made there was also no money.

That isn't called discipline, it's logic .

Since the Government to government sales have been suspended under the caretaker government, that is if there ever were such agreements, what are the odds that they recently have borrowed money in Dubai to keep their voters happy shortly before the new election ?

Posted (edited)

They must like queing up to make fools of themselves in the media. Financial dicipline? If it were so disiplined then why isn't the money there to pay the farmers! complete idiots.

Nothing to do with the fact that they can't sell the rice, is it?

Edited by ggold
Posted

It's incredible that all these Billions are suddenly appearing, and getting approval, at this time. whistling.gif

Multi-deca-Billions for rice, state employees, infrastructures.... and a wad of 40% of that is surplus to requirements..... clap2.gif

-mel.

Posted

This rice pledging scam can become a massive economical hangover for the rice farmers of Thailand. What can they do if they have no cash for the next crop, no money for fertilizers, no fuel for their tractors (or food for their buffaloes) and what will they do if they can't sell the next crop because all the warehouses are already full of unsold rice?

  • Like 1
Posted

Revolving financial management: Yes this describes and points out the real problems this government has managed to bring upon the Thai people. For this age old mangement system to prove successful, you need more revenue coming in than your expenses that go out.

The government attempts to sell farm product, bonds, and/or borrow money to generate revenue have not been as successful as their ability to skim off the top, pay the middlemen involved, thus the farmers (suppliers) are being shafted along with the Thai people (investors) This program seems to be going the way most do, when operated in such a manner.(Bankrupt)

Posted

This rice pledging scam can become a massive economical hangover for the rice farmers of Thailand. What can they do if they have no cash for the next crop, no money for fertilizers, no fuel for their tractors (or food for their buffaloes) and what will they do if they can't sell the next crop because all the warehouses are already full of unsold rice?

The Thai people will just go marry a farrang. Easy

  • Like 1
Posted

There are so many numbers bandies around you will never know the truth.

But the way i figure they add up and state what they need is simple arithmetic..

1 + 1 +2 ? (Oh no we need more )

1 + 1 = 11 THATS IT!

  • Like 2
Posted

This is good news - with such close financial discipline the Ministry must be able to release accurate figures after all.

So, let's see just how much money has been lost in total, and how much skimmed off, and to whom.

Someone has this all detailed somewhere.

Great to see how PTP creatively manage all the countries problems. Bank - "we can't pay because we haven't got the money" PTP - "yes you have".

Complete <deleted> - but par for the course !

  • Like 1
Posted

where are our red friends defending the undefendable.very choosy on the topics they comment on arnt they...how strange...who would have thought,,hypocrits the lot of them...no doubt someone with 20 posts will be along shortly,saying its all because of suphep...hahahahashacheesy.gifcheesy.gif

Didn't some PTP urchin try this last week? Claimed the farmers hadn't been paid because the democrats wouldn't counter sign the payment mandate or some such rubbish.

Everyone knows this was Thaksin's idea. So no one in the gang dare admit its a complete failure.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Revolving financial management: Yes this describes and points out the real problems this government has managed to bring upon the Thai people. For this age old mangement system to prove successful, you need more revenue coming in than your expenses that go out.

The government attempts to sell farm product, bonds, and/or borrow money to generate revenue have not been as successful as their ability to skim off the top, pay the middlemen involved, thus the farmers (suppliers) are being shafted along with the Thai people (investors) This program seems to be going the way most do, when operated in such a manner.(Bankrupt)

"Revolving financial management:" Puea Thai style

attachicon.gifrw.jpg

Nice!

With your revolving modell u have a fair chance to win 1/37.

But with the rice scheme the chance, that the thai people win anything is 0 (Zero)

If you buy a reproducible product continually for 14,000 Baht/ton and the world market price for these good is 10,000 Baht/ton,

then the loss is due the system, pre-programmed.

But this is a state secret.

Edited by tomacht8
Posted

There are so many numbers bandies around you will never know the truth.

But the way i figure they add up and state what they need is simple arithmetic..

1 + 1 +2 ? (Oh no we need more )

1 + 1 = 11 THATS IT!

1+1= 3 for those that know

Posted

Revolving financial management: Yes this describes and points out the real problems this government has managed to bring upon the Thai people. For this age old mangement system to prove successful, you need more revenue coming in than your expenses that go out.

The government attempts to sell farm product, bonds, and/or borrow money to generate revenue have not been as successful as their ability to skim off the top, pay the middlemen involved, thus the farmers (suppliers) are being shafted along with the Thai people (investors) This program seems to be going the way most do, when operated in such a manner.(Bankrupt)

"Revolving financial management:" Puea Thai style

attachicon.gifrw.jpg

That looks just like a HUB to me and all this talk of revolving finances, doors etc. Something does not add up, shall we move on to the next topic before someone is caught with their trousers(or knickers) down.

I dont understand why the rest of the world does not follow the Thailand Financial Masterplan, it wont be long before Bangkok is the new Wall Street and The City all rolled into one.

Posted
BANGKOK, Dec 14 – The government is financially capable of paying farmers who sold rice under the subsidy scheme but the delay in payment was due to financial discipline on managing the revolving fund, according to a deputy commerce minister.

Thaksinspeak for ''we don't have the money as we need to finance an electionwhistling.gif .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...