-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
.thumb.jpeg.d2d19a66404642fd9ff62d6262fd153e.jpeg)
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
-
Latest posts...
-
175
Tourism Thailand Vows to End Dual Pricing Amid Growing Tourist Backlash
But its also a flawed comparison - The increased admission fees for non-EU visitors to the Louvre in 2026 will not be determined by nationality, but by residency. In practice, this means that a Thai, Singaporean, or indeed any non-EU national residing within the EU can simply present proof of residency - such as a residency card, driving licence, or utility bill - and will be eligible for the same rate as EU citizens. Therefore, every example cited by newnative is fundamentally misguided. None of them illustrate a dual pricing system based on nationality - which is precisely how Thailand's system operates. In Thailand, the dual pricing excludes non-Thai residents, including those with work permits, permanent residency, or long-term visas. If you don't hold a Thai passport, you're charged the higher rate - plain and simple. This is what makes Thailand’s policy xenophobic in nature. -
27
-
49
Tell us all about the "interesting" youtube channels that you watch (2025 version)
I could only watch the first few minutes before I stopped in disgust. The obvious lie that there were no black people in the Roman army has been disproven many times. Maybe he later explained that the Romans held north Africa and so must have allowed black people to join the army but when you catch someone in an ignorant comment the first few seconds, turn it off. Black Romans in Britain - Black Presence Black people in ancient Rome « IMPERIUM ROMANUM Diversity in the Roman Army -
14
All These Hairy Men.
Ah sounds like you are one of those guys, it's ok, don't be too embarrassed -
182
-
182
Another win for Trump (breaking news)
I'm not Ukrainian. I've never lived in Ukraine. I've never even visited Ukraine. But I'm pretty sure Russia could overrun the entire country if that's what they wanted to do. But they don't. To think they do is silly. Nor do they want to continue on and re-establish the old Soviet Union or occupy all of Europe. The old Soviet Union went bankrupt trying to hold it all together. They won't try that again. As I understand it, Russia's primary concern is to establish a situation whereby they have a neutral buffer zone with no possibility of NATO missiles and no possibility of any other kind of foreign missiles on the Russian border. Putin has been saying that for years. And it makes sense. Short and intermediate range missiles give their enemy an advantage, as parts of Russia's strategic defense systems would be compromised. So that's one of their objectives. In addition, they want a "de-Nazification" of Ukraine. I guess they've had enough of those people over the years. They still remember Hitler. They won't let that happen again. Makes sense to me. And they want the international community to recognize the fact that parts of what used to be Ukraine are now Russian. Reality. Ukraine won't get that territory back. Give them that, stop the war, and stop the killing. That's the best Ukraine can expect, I'm afraid. Or do you think we should have to have WW III because Russia won and the world isn't fair?
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now